DG2 doesn't have a SAGV or QGV points that determine memory bandwidth.
Instead it has a constant amount of memory bandwidth available to
display that does not need to be reduced based on the number of active
planes.
For simplicity, we'll just modify driver initialization to create a
single dummy QGV point with the proper amount of memory bandwidth,
rather than trying to query the pcode for this information.
Bspec: 64631
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-19-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
DG2 extends our DDB to four DBuf slices; pipes A+B only have access to
the first two slices, whereas pipes C+D only have access to the second
two.
Confusingly, our bspec decided to switch from 1-based numbering
of dbuf slices (S1, S2) to 0-based numbering (S0, S1, S2, S3) in
Display13. At the moment we're using the 0-based number scheme for the
DBUF_CTL_S() register addressing, but the 1-based number scheme in the
actual slice assignment tables. We may want to consider switching the
assignment over to 0-based numbering too at some point...
Bspec: 49255
Bspec: 50057
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-16-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
As we begin applying XeHP and DG2 patches, the basic platform
definitions and macros (like IS_DG2()) will be needed in both
drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next. Those initial definition patches
are applied to a topic branch and merged to both trees.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Our _FEATURES macro went back to GEN7, extending each other, making it
difficult to grasp what was really enabled/disabled. Take the
opportunity of the GEN -> XE_HP name break and also break with the
feature inheritance.
For XE_HP this basically goes from GEN12 back to GEN7 coalescing the
features making sure the overrides remain, remove all the
display-specific features and sort it.
Then also remove the definitions that would be overridden by
DGFX_FEATURES and those that were 0 (since that is the default).
Exception here is has_master_unit_irq: although it is a feature that
started with DG1 and is true for all DGFX platforms, it's also true for
XE_HP in general.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Besides the arch version returned by GRAPHICS_VER(), new platforms
contain a "release id" to make clear the difference from one platform to
another.
The release id number is not formally defined by hardware until future
platforms that will expose it via a new GMD_ID register. For the
platforms we support before that register becomes available we will set
the values in software and we can set them as we please. So the plan is
to set them so we can group different features under a single
GRAPHICS_VER_FULL() check.
After GMD_ID is used, the usefulness of a "full version check" will be
greatly reduced and will be mostly used for deciding workarounds and a
few code paths. So it makes sense to keep it as a separate field from
graphics_ver. Also, as a platform with `release == n` may be closer
feature-wise to `n - 2` than to `n - 1`, use the word "release" rather
than the more common "minor" for this
This is a mix of 2 independent changes: one by me and the other by Matt
Roper.
v2:
- Reword commit message to make it clearer why we don't call it
"minor" (Matt Roper and Tvrtko)
- Rename variables s/*_ver_release/*_rel/ and print them in a single
line formatted as {ver}.{rel:2} (Jani and Matt Roper)
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210707235921.2416911-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit ca6374e267)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Workarounds are documented in the bspec with an exclusive upper bound
(i.e., a "fixed" stepping that no longer needs the workaround). This
makes our driver's use of an inclusive upper bound for stepping ranges
confusing; the differing notation between code and bspec makes it very
easy for mistakes to creep in.
Let's switch the upper bound of our IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP macros over to use
an exclusive upper bound like the bspec does. This also has the benefit
of helping make sure workarounds are properly handled for new minor
steppings that show up (e.g., an A1 between the A0 and B0 we already
knew about) --- if the new intermediate stepping pulls in hardware fixes
early, there will be an update to the workaround definition which lets
us know we need to change our code. If the new stepping does not pull a
hardware fix earlier, then the new stepping will already be captured
properly by the "[begin, fix)" range in the code.
We'll probably need to be extra vigilant in code review of new
workarounds for the near future to make sure developers notice the new
semantics of workaround bounds. But we just migrated a bunch of our
platforms from the IS_REVID bounds over to IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP, so people
are already adjusting to the new macros and now is a good time to make
this change too.
[mattrope: Split out display changes to apply through intel-next tree]
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717051426.4120328-8-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
The switch from old old IS_FOO_REVID() macros to the new table-based
IS_FOO_{GT,DISP}_STEP() macros is needed on both drm-intel-next (for
display-based DMC matching) and drm-intel-gt-next (for workaround
guards). To avoid conflicts, we'll apply the patches to a topic branch
and merge it to both intel branches to ensure the transition to the
new macros is clean.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Switch ICL to use a revid->stepping table as we're trying to do on all
platforms going forward. While we're at it, let's include some
additional steppings that have popped up, even if we don't yet have any
workarounds tied to those steppings (we probably need to audit our
workaround list soon to see if any of the bounds have moved or if new
workarounds have appeared).
Note that the current bspec table is missing information about how to
map PCI revision ID to GT/display steppings; it only provides an SoC
stepping. The mapping to GT/display steppings (which aren't always the
same as the SoC stepping) used to be in the bspec, but was apparently
dropped during an update in Nov 2019; I've made my changes here based on
an older bspec snapshot that still had the necessary information. We've
requested that the missing information be restored.
I'm only including the production revids in the table here since we're
past the point at which we usually stop trying to support pre-production
hardware. An appropriate check is added to
intel_detect_preproduction_hw() to print an error and taint the kernel
just in case someone still tries to load the driver on old
pre-production hardware.
v2:
- Drop pre-production steppings and add error/taint at startup when
loading on pre-production hardware.
Bspec: 21141 # pre-Nov 2019 snapshot
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713193635.3390052-8-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Switch BXT to use a revid->stepping table as we're trying to do on all
platforms going forward. Note that the REVID macros we had before
weren't being used anywhere in the code and weren't even correct; the
table values come from the bspec (and omits all the placeholder and
preproduction revisions).
Although nothing in the code is using the data from this table at the
moment, we expect some upcoming DMC patches to start utilizing it.
Bspec: 13620
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713193635.3390052-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Switch SKL to use a revid->stepping table as we're trying to do on all
platforms going forward. Also drop the preproduction revisions and add
the newer steppings we hadn't already handled.
Note that SKL has a case where a newer revision ID corresponds to an
older GT/disp stepping (0x9 -> STEP_J0, 0xA -> STEP_I1). Also, the lack
of a revision ID 0x8 in the table is intentional and not an oversight.
We'll re-write the KBL-specific comment to make it clear that these kind
of quirks are expected.
v2:
- Since GT and display steppings are always identical on SKL use a
macro to set both values at once in a more readable manner. (Anusha)
- Drop preproduction steppings.
Bspec: 13626
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713193635.3390052-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Although we're converting our workarounds to use a revid->stepping
lookup table, the function that detects pre-production hardware should
continue to compare against PCI revision ID values directly. These are
listed in the bspec as integers, so it's easier to confirm their
correctness if we just use an integer literal rather than a symbolic
name anyway.
Bspec: 13620, 19131, 13626, 18329
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713193635.3390052-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
The kernel recovers in due course from missing Mlocked pages: but there
was no point in calling page_mlock() (formerly known as
try_to_munlock()) on a THP, because nothing got done even when it was
found to be mapped in another VM_LOCKED vma.
It's true that we need to be careful: Mlocked accounting of pte-mapped
THPs is too difficult (so consistently avoided); but Mlocked accounting
of only-pmd-mapped THPs is supposed to work, even when multiple mappings
are mlocked and munlocked or munmapped. Refine the tests.
There is already a VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageDoubleMap) in page_mlock(), so
page_mlock_one() does not even have to worry about that complication.
(I said the kernel recovers: but would page reclaim be likely to split
THP before rediscovering that it's VM_LOCKED? I've not followed that up)
Fixes: 9a73f61bdb ("thp, mlock: do not mlock PTE-mapped file huge pages")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cfa154c-d595-406-eb7d-eb9df730f944@google.com/
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Pull irq fixes from Ingo Molnar:
"Two fixes:
- Fix a MIPS IRQ handling RCU bug
- Remove a DocBook annotation for a parameter that doesn't exist
anymore"
* tag 'irq-urgent-2021-07-11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
irqchip/mips: Fix RCU violation when using irqdomain lookup on interrupt entry
genirq/irqdesc: Drop excess kernel-doc entry @lookup
