Staring at the comment "Recheck VMA as permissions can change since
migration started" in remove_migration_pte() can result in confusion,
because if the source PTE/PMD indicates write permissions, then there
should be no need to check VMA write permissions when restoring migration
entries or PTE-mapping a PMD.
Commit d3cb8bf608 ("mm: migrate: Close race between migration completion
and mprotect") introduced the maybe_mkwrite() handling in
remove_migration_pte() in 2014, stating that a race between mprotect() and
migration finishing would be possible, and that we could end up with a
writable PTE that should be readable.
However, mprotect() code first updates vma->vm_flags / vma->vm_page_prot
and then walks the page tables to (a) set all present writable PTEs to
read-only and (b) convert all writable migration entries to readable
migration entries. While walking the page tables and modifying the
entries, migration code has to grab the PT locks to synchronize against
concurrent page table modifications.
Assuming migration would find a writable migration entry (while holding
the PT lock) and replace it with a writable present PTE, surely mprotect()
code didn't stumble over the writable migration entry yet (converting it
into a readable migration entry) and would instead wait for the PT lock to
convert the now present writable PTE into a read-only PTE. As mprotect()
didn't finish yet, the behavior is just like migration didn't happen: a
writable PTE will be converted to a read-only PTE.
So it's fine to rely on the writability information in the source PTE/PMD
and not recheck against the VMA as long as we're holding the PT lock to
synchronize with anyone who concurrently wants to downgrade write
permissions (like mprotect()) by first adjusting vma->vm_flags /
vma->vm_page_prot to then walk over the page tables to adjust the page
table entries.
Running test cases that should reveal such races -- mprotect(PROT_READ)
racing with page migration or THP splitting -- for multiple hours did not
reveal an issue with this cleanup.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230418142113.439494-1-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In commit fd4a7ac329 ("mm: migrate: try again if THP split is failed due
to page refcnt"), if the THP splitting fails due to page reference count,
we will retry to improve migration successful rate. But the failed
splitting is counted as migration failure and migration retry, which will
cause duplicated failure counting. So, in this patch, this is fixed via
undoing the failure counting if we decide to retry. The patch is tested
via failure injection.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230416235929.1040194-1-ying.huang@intel.com
Fixes: fd4a7ac329 ("mm: migrate: try again if THP split is failed due to page refcnt")
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Add a test suite (with 10 more sub-tests) to cover RO pinning against
fork() over uffd-wp. It covers both:
(1) Early CoW test in fork() when page pinned,
(2) page unshare due to RO longterm pin.
They are:
Testing wp-fork-pin on anon... done
Testing wp-fork-pin on shmem... done
Testing wp-fork-pin on shmem-private... done
Testing wp-fork-pin on hugetlb... done
Testing wp-fork-pin on hugetlb-private... done
Testing wp-fork-pin-with-event on anon... done
Testing wp-fork-pin-with-event on shmem... done
Testing wp-fork-pin-with-event on shmem-private... done
Testing wp-fork-pin-with-event on hugetlb... done
Testing wp-fork-pin-with-event on hugetlb-private... done
CONFIG_GUP_TEST needed or they'll be skipped.
Testing wp-fork-pin on anon... skipped [reason: Possibly CONFIG_GUP_TEST missing or unprivileged]
Note that the major test goal is on private memory, but no hurt to also run
all of them over shared because shared memory should work the same.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230417195317.898696-7-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Extend it to all types of mem, meanwhile add one parallel test when
EVENT_FORK is enabled, where uffd-wp bits should be persisted rather than
dropped.
Since at it, rename the test to "wp-fork" to better show what it means.
Making the new test called "wp-fork-with-event".
Before:
Testing pagemap on anon... done
After:
Testing wp-fork on anon... done
Testing wp-fork on shmem... done
Testing wp-fork on shmem-private... done
Testing wp-fork on hugetlb... done
Testing wp-fork on hugetlb-private... done
Testing wp-fork-with-event on anon... done
Testing wp-fork-with-event on shmem... done
Testing wp-fork-with-event on shmem-private... done
Testing wp-fork-with-event on hugetlb... done
Testing wp-fork-with-event on hugetlb-private... done
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230417195317.898696-5-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
When we try to unshare a pinned page for a private hugetlb, uffd-wp bit
can get lost during unsharing.
When above condition met, one can lose uffd-wp bit on the privately mapped
hugetlb page. It allows the page to be writable even if it should still be
wr-protected. I assume it can mean data loss.
This should be very rare, only if an unsharing happened on a private
hugetlb page with uffd-wp protected (e.g. in a child which shares the
same page with parent with UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK enabled).
When I wrote the reproducer (provided in the last patch) I needed to
use the newest gup_test cmd introduced by David to trigger it because I
don't even know another way to do a proper RO longerm pin.
Besides that, it needs a bunch of other conditions all met:
(1) hugetlb being mapped privately,
(2) userfaultfd registered with WP and EVENT_FORK,
(3) the user app fork()s, then,
(4) RO longterm pin onto a wr-protected anonymous page.
If it's not impossible to hit in production I'd say extremely rare.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230417195317.898696-3-peterx@redhat.com
Fixes: 166f3ecc0d ("mm/hugetlb: hook page faults for uffd write protection")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@redhat.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
hwpoison_user_mappings() is updated to support ksm pages, and add
collect_procs_ksm() to collect processes when the error hit an ksm page.
The difference from collect_procs_anon() is that it also needs to traverse
the rmap-item list on the stable node of the ksm page. At the same time,
add_to_kill_ksm() is added to handle ksm pages. And
task_in_to_kill_list() is added to avoid duplicate addition of tsk to the
to_kill list. This is because when scanning the list, if the pages that
make up the ksm page all come from the same process, they may be added
repeatedly.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414021741.2597273-3-xialonglong1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Longlong Xia <xialonglong1@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm: ksm: support hwpoison for ksm page", v2.
Currently, ksm does not support hwpoison. As ksm is being used more
widely for deduplication at the system level, container level, and process
level, supporting hwpoison for ksm has become increasingly important.
However, ksm pages were not processed by hwpoison in 2009 [1].
The main method of implementation:
1. Refactor add_to_kill() and add new add_to_kill_*() to better
accommodate the handling of different types of pages.
2. Add collect_procs_ksm() to collect processes when the error hit an
ksm page.
3. Add task_in_to_kill_list() to avoid duplicate addition of tsk to
the to_kill list.
4. Try_to_unmap ksm page (already supported).
5. Handle related processes such as sending SIGBUS.
Tested with poisoning to ksm page from
1) different process
2) one process
and with/without memory_failure_early_kill set, the processes are killed
as expected with the patchset.
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/
commit/?h=01e00f880ca700376e1845cf7a2524ebe68e47d6
This patch (of 2):
The page_address_in_vma() is used to find the user virtual address of page
in add_to_kill(), but it doesn't support ksm due to the ksm page->index
unusable, add an ksm_addr as parameter to add_to_kill(), let's the caller
to pass it, also rename the function to __add_to_kill(), and adding
add_to_kill_anon_file() for handling anonymous pages and file pages,
adding add_to_kill_fsdax() for handling fsdax pages.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414021741.2597273-1-xialonglong1@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414021741.2597273-2-xialonglong1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Longlong Xia <xialonglong1@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The va_high_addr_switch selftest is used to test mmap across 128TB
boundary. It divides the selftest cases into two main categories on the
basis of size. One set is used to create mappings that are multiples of
PAGE_SIZE while the other creates mappings that are multiples of
HUGETLB_SIZE.
In order to run the hugetlb testcases the binary must be appended with
"--run-hugetlb" but the file that used to run the test only invokes the
binary, thereby completely skipping the hugetlb testcases. Hence, the
required statement has been added.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230323105243.2807166-6-chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Chaitanya S Prakash <chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "selftests/mm: Implement support for arm64 on va".
The va_128TBswitch selftest is designed and implemented for PowerPC and
x86 architectures which support a 128TB switch, up to 256TB of virtual
address space and hugepage sizes of 16MB and 2MB respectively. Arm64
platforms on the other hand support a 256Tb switch, up to 4PB of virtual
address space and a default hugepage size of 512MB when 64k pagesize is
enabled.
These architectural differences require introducing support for arm64
platforms, after which a more generic naming convention is suggested. The
in code comments are amended to provide a more platform independent
explanation of the working of the code and nr_hugepages are configured as
required. Finally, the file running the testcase is modified in order to
prevent skipping of hugetlb testcases of va_high_addr_switch.
This patch (of 5):
Arm64 platforms have the ability to support 64kb pagesize, 512MB default
hugepage size and up to 4PB of virtual address space. The address switch
occurs at 256TB as opposed to 128TB. Hence, the necessary support has
been added.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230323105243.2807166-1-chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230323105243.2807166-2-chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Chaitanya S Prakash <chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Android 14 and later default to MGLRU [1] and field telemetry showed
occasional long tail latency (>100ms) in the reclaim path.
Tracing revealed priority inversion in the reclaim path. In
try_to_inc_max_seq(), when high priority tasks were blocked on
wait_event_killable(), the preemption of the low priority task to call
wake_up_all() caused those high priority tasks to wait longer than
necessary. In general, this problem is not different from others of its
kind, e.g., one caused by mutex_lock(). However, it is specific to MGLRU
because it introduced the new wait queue lruvec->mm_state.wait.
The purpose of this new wait queue is to avoid the thundering herd
problem. If many direct reclaimers rush into try_to_inc_max_seq(), only
one can succeed, i.e., the one to wake up the rest, and the rest who
failed might cause premature OOM kills if they do not wait. So far there
is no evidence supporting this scenario, based on how often the wait has
been hit. And this begs the question how useful the wait queue is in
practice.
Based on Minchan's recommendation, which is in line with his commit
6d4675e601 ("mm: don't be stuck to rmap lock on reclaim path") and the
rest of the MGLRU code which also uses trylock when possible, remove the
wait queue.
[1] https://android-review.googlesource.com/q/I7ed7fbfd6ef9ce10053347528125dd98c39e50bf
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230413214326.2147568-1-kaleshsingh@google.com
Fixes: bd74fdaea1 ("mm: multi-gen LRU: support page table walks")
Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Suggested-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>
Acked-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <heftig@archlinux.org>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Cc: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The calculation of workingset size is the core logic of handling refault,
it had been updated several times[1][2] after workingset.c was created[3].
But the description hadn't been updated accordingly, this mismatch may
confuse the readers. So we update the description to make it consistent
to the code.
[1] commit 34e58cac6d ("mm: workingset: let cache workingset challenge anon")
[2] commit aae466b005 ("mm/swap: implement workingset detection for anonymous LRU")
[3] commit a528910e12 ("mm: thrash detection-based file cache sizing")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/202304131634494948454@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "Ignore non-LRU-based reclaim in memcg reclaim", v6.
Upon running some proactive reclaim tests using memory.reclaim, we noticed
some tests flaking where writing to memory.reclaim would be successful
even though we did not reclaim the requested amount fully Looking further
into it, I discovered that *sometimes* we overestimate the number of
reclaimed pages in memcg reclaim.
Reclaimed pages through other means than LRU-based reclaim are tracked
through reclaim_state in struct scan_control, which is stashed in current
task_struct. These pages are added to the number of reclaimed pages
through LRUs. For memcg reclaim, these pages generally cannot be linked
to the memcg under reclaim and can cause an overestimated count of
reclaimed pages. This short series tries to address that.
Patch 1 ignores pages reclaimed outside of LRU reclaim in memcg reclaim.
The pages are uncharged anyway, so even if we end up under-reporting
reclaimed pages we will still succeed in making progress during charging.
Patches 2-3 are just refactoring. Patch 2 moves set_reclaim_state()
helper next to flush_reclaim_state(). Patch 3 adds a helper that wraps
updating current->reclaim_state, and renames reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab
to reclaim_state->reclaimed.
This patch (of 3):
We keep track of different types of reclaimed pages through
reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab, and we add them to the reported number of
reclaimed pages. For non-memcg reclaim, this makes sense. For memcg
reclaim, we have no clue if those pages are charged to the memcg under
reclaim.
Slab pages are shared by different memcgs, so a freed slab page may have
only been partially charged to the memcg under reclaim. The same goes for
clean file pages from pruned inodes (on highmem systems) or xfs buffer
pages, there is no simple way to currently link them to the memcg under
reclaim.
Stop reporting those freed pages as reclaimed pages during memcg reclaim.
This should make the return value of writing to memory.reclaim, and may
help reduce unnecessary reclaim retries during memcg charging. Writing to
memory.reclaim on the root memcg is considered as cgroup_reclaim(), but
for this case we want to include any freed pages, so use the
global_reclaim() check instead of !cgroup_reclaim().
Generally, this should make the return value of
try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() more accurate. In some limited cases (e.g.
freed a slab page that was mostly charged to the memcg under reclaim),
the return value of try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() can be underestimated,
but this should be fine. The freed pages will be uncharged anyway, and we
can charge the memcg the next time around as we usually do memcg reclaim
in a retry loop.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230413104034.1086717-1-yosryahmed@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230413104034.1086717-2-yosryahmed@google.com
Fixes: f2fe7b09a5 ("mm: memcg/slab: charge individual slab objects
instead of pages")
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
copy-on-write of hugetlb user pages with uncorrectable errors will result
in a kernel crash. This is because the copy is performed in kernel mode
and in general we can not handle accessing memory with such errors while
in kernel mode. Commit a873dfe103 ("mm, hwpoison: try to recover from
copy-on write faults") introduced the routine copy_user_highpage_mc() to
gracefully handle copying of user pages with uncorrectable errors.
However, the separate hugetlb copy-on-write code paths were not modified
as part of commit a873dfe103.
Modify hugetlb copy-on-write code paths to use copy_mc_user_highpage() so
that they can also gracefully handle uncorrectable errors in user pages.
This involves changing the hugetlb specific routine
copy_user_large_folio() from type void to int so that it can return an
error. Modify the hugetlb userfaultfd code in the same way so that it can
return -EHWPOISON if it encounters an uncorrectable error.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230413131349.2524210-1-liushixin2@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In a kernel with added WARN_ON_ONCE(PageTail) in page_memcg_check(), we
observed a warning from page_cgroup_ino() when reading /proc/kpagecgroup.
This warning was added to catch fragile reads of a page memcg. Make
page_cgroup_ino() get memcg from the page's folio using
folio_memcg_check(): that gives it the correct memcg for each page of a
folio, so is the right fix.
Note that page_folio() is racy, the page's folio can change from under us,
but the entire function is racy and documented as such.
I dithered between the right fix and the safer "fix": it's unlikely but
conceivable that some userspace has learnt that /proc/kpagecgroup gives no
memcg on tail pages, and compensates for that in some (racy) way: so
continuing to give no memcg on tails, without warning, might be safer.
But hwpoison_filter_task(), the only other user of page_cgroup_ino(),
persuaded me. It looks as if it currently leaves out tail pages of the
selected memcg, by mistake: whereas hwpoison_inject() uses compound_head()
and expects the tails to be included. So hwpoison testing coverage has
probably been restricted by the wrong output from page_cgroup_ino() (if
that memcg filter is used at all): in the short term, it might be safer
not to enable wider coverage there, but long term we would regret that.
This is based on a patch originally written by Hugh Dickins and retains
most of the original commit log [1]
The patch was changed to use folio_memcg_check(page_folio(page)) instead
of page_memcg_check(compound_head(page)) based on discussions with Matthew
Wilcox; where he stated that callers of page_memcg_check() should stop
using it due to the ambiguity around tail pages -- instead they should use
folio_memcg_check() and handle tail pages themselves.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412003451.4018887-1-yosryahmed@google.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230313083452.1319968-1-yosryahmed@google.com/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The userfaultfd stress test never tested private shmem, which I think was
overlooked long due. Add it so it matches with uffd unit test and it'll
cover all memory supported with the three memory types.
Meanwhile, rename the memory types a bit. Considering shared mem is the
major use case for both shmem / hugetlbfs, changing from:
anon, hugetlb, hugetlb_shared, shmem
To (with shmem-private added):
anon, hugetlb, hugetlb-private, shmem, shmem-private
Add the shmem-private to run_vmtests.sh too.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412164546.329355-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
With the new uffd unit test covering the /dev/userfaultfd path and syscall
path of uffd initializations, we can safely drop the devnode test in the
old stress test.
One thing is to avoid duplication of running the stress test twice which is
an overkill to only test the /dev/ interface in run_vmtests.sh.
The other benefit is now all uffd tests (that uses userfaultfd_open) can
run automatically as long as any type of interface is enabled (either
syscall or dev), so it's more likely to succeed rather than fail due to
unprivilege.
With this patch lands, we can drop all the "mem_type:XXX" handlings too.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412164525.329176-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Move the two tests into the unit test, and convert it into 20 standalone
tests:
- events test on all 5 mem types, with wp on/off
- signal test on all 5 mem types, with wp on/off
Testing sigbus on anon... done
Testing sigbus on shmem... done
Testing sigbus on shmem-private... done
Testing sigbus on hugetlb... done
Testing sigbus on hugetlb-private... done
Testing sigbus-wp on anon... done
Testing sigbus-wp on shmem... done
Testing sigbus-wp on shmem-private... done
Testing sigbus-wp on hugetlb... done
Testing sigbus-wp on hugetlb-private... done
Testing events on anon... done
Testing events on shmem... done
Testing events on shmem-private... done
Testing events on hugetlb... done
Testing events on hugetlb-private... done
Testing events-wp on anon... done
Testing events-wp on shmem... done
Testing events-wp on shmem-private... done
Testing events-wp on hugetlb... done
Testing events-wp on hugetlb-private... done
It'll also remove a lot of global references along the way,
e.g. test_uffdio_wp will be replaced with the wp value passed over.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412164400.328798-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This moves the minor test to the new unit test.
Rewrite the content check with char* opeartions to avoid fiddling with
my_bcmp().
Drop global vars test_uffdio_minor and test_collapse, just assume test them
always in common code for now.
OTOH make this single test into five tests:
- minor test on [shmem, hugetlb] with wp=false
- minor test on [shmem, hugetlb] with wp=true
- minor test + collapse on shmem only
One thing to mention that we used to test COLLAPSE+WP but that doesn't
sound right at all. It's possible it's silently broken but unnoticed
because COLLAPSE is not part of the default test suite.
Make the MADV_COLLAPSE test fail-able (by skip it when failing), because
it's not guaranteed to success anyway.
Drop a bunch of useless code after the move, because the unit test always
use aligned num of pages and has nothing to do with n_cpus.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412164357.328779-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
