On some Panasonic models the volume up/down/mute keypresses get
reported both through the Panasonic ACPI HKEY interface as well as
through the atkbd device.
Filter out the atkbd scan-codes for these to avoid reporting presses
twice.
Note normally we would leave the filtering of these to userspace by mapping
the scan-codes to KEY_UNKNOWN through /lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-keyboard.hwdb.
However in this case that would cause regressions since we were filtering
the Panasonic ACPI HKEY events before, so filter these in the kernel.
Fixes: ed83c91718 ("platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Resolve hotkey double trigger bug")
Reported-and-tested-by: Stefan Seyfried <seife+kernel@b1-systems.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Kenneth Chan <kenneth.t.chan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220624112340.10130-7-hdegoede@redhat.com
Some systems have an ACPI video bus but not ACPI video devices with
backlight capability. On these devices brightness key-presses are
(logically) not reported through the ACPI video bus.
Change how acpi_video_handles_brightness_key_presses() determines if
brightness key-presses are handled by the ACPI video driver to avoid
vendor specific drivers/platform/x86 drivers filtering out their
brightness key-presses even though they are the only ones reporting
these presses.
Fixes: ed83c91718 ("platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Resolve hotkey double trigger bug")
Reported-and-tested-by: Stefan Seyfried <seife+kernel@b1-systems.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Kenneth Chan <kenneth.t.chan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220624112340.10130-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig is wrapped in one big
if X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES .. endif and X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES already
has a "depends on X86" so the "if X86" in drivers/platform/Kconfig
is not necessary and except for MIPS none of the other includes
there has such an if. So let's remove it.
While at it also move the x86/Kconfig include to the end of the file
for alphabetical sorting.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220620145628.5882-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
Add support for the detachable keyboard cover on the Surface Pro 8.
The keyboard cover on the Surface Pro 8 is, unlike the keyboard covers
of earlier Surface Pro generations, handled via the Surface System
Aggregator Module (SSAM). The keyboard and touchpad (as well as other
HID input devices) of this cover are standard SSAM HID client devices
(just like keyboard and touchpad on e.g. the Surface Laptop 3 and 4),
however, some care needs to be taken as they can be physically detached
(similarly to the Surface Book 3). Specifically, the respective SSAM
client devices need to be removed when the keyboard cover has been
detached and (re-)initialized when the keyboard cover has been
(re-)attached.
On the Surface Pro 8, detachment of the keyboard cover (and by extension
its devices) is managed via the KIP subsystem. Therefore, said devices
need to be registered under the KIP device hub, which in turn will
remove and re-create/re-initialize those devices as needed.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-13-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Add a Surface System Aggregator Module (SSAM) client device hub for
hot-removable devices managed via the KIP subsystem.
The KIP subsystem (full name unknown, abbreviation has been obtained
through reverse engineering) is a subsystem that manages hot-removable
SSAM client devices. Specifically, it manages HID input devices
contained in the detachable keyboard cover of the Surface Pro 8 and
Surface Pro X.
The KIP subsystem handles a single group of devices (e.g. all devices
contained in the keyboard cover) and cannot handle devices individually.
Thus we model it as a client device hub, which (hot-)removes all devices
contained under it once removal of the hub (e.g. keyboard cover) has
been detected and (re-)adds all devices once the physical hub device has
been (re-)attached. To do this, use the previously generified SSAM
subsystem hub framework.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-12-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The Surface System Aggregator Module (SSAM) has multiple subsystems that
can manage detachable devices. At the moment, we only support the "base"
(BAS/0x11) subsystem, which is used on the Surface Book 3 to manage
devices (including keyboard, touchpad, and secondary battery) connected
to the base of the device.
The Surface Pro 8 has a new type-cover with keyboard and touchpad, which
is managed via the KIP/0x0e subsystem. The general procedure is the
same, but with slightly different events and setup. To make
implementation of the KIP hub easier and prevent duplication, generify
the parts of the base hub that we can use for the KIP hub (or any
potential future subsystem hubs).
This also switches over to use the newly introduced "hot-remove"
functionality, which should prevent communication issues when devices
have been detached.
Lastly, also drop the undocumented and unused sysfs "state" attribute of
the base hub. It has at best been useful for debugging.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-10-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The KIP subsystem (full name unknown, abbreviation has been obtained
through reverse engineering) handles detachable peripherals such as the
keyboard cover on the Surface Pro X and Surface Pro 8.
It is currently not entirely clear what this subsystem entails, but at
the very least it provides event notifications for when the keyboard
cover on the Surface Pro X and Surface Pro 8 have been detached or
re-attached, as well as the state that the keyboard cover is currently
in (e.g. folded-back, folded laptop-like, closed, etc.).
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-9-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Add support for hot-removal of SSAM HID client devices.
Once a device has been hot-removed, further communication with it should
be avoided as it may fail and time out. While the device will be removed
as soon as we detect hot-removal, communication may still occur during
teardown, especially when unregistering notifiers.
While hot-removal is a surprise event that can happen at any time, try
to avoid communication as much as possible once it has been detected to
prevent timeouts that can slow down device removal and cause issues,
e.g. when quickly re-attaching the device.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-8-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
When SSAM client devices have been (physically) hot-removed,
communication attempts with those devices may fail and time out. This
can even extend to event notifiers, due to which timeouts may occur
during device removal, slowing down that process.
Add a parameter to the notifier unregister function that allows skipping
communication with the EC to prevent this. Furthermore, add wrappers for
registering and unregistering notifiers belonging to SSAM client devices
that automatically check if the device has been marked as hot-removed
and communication should be avoided.
Note that non-SSAM client devices can generally not be hot-removed, so
also add a convenience wrapper for those, defaulting to allow
communication.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-4-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Some SSAM devices, notably the keyboard cover (keyboard and touchpad) on
the Surface Pro 8, can be hot-removed. When this occurs, communication
with the device may fail and time out. This timeout can unnecessarily
block and slow down device removal and even cause issues when the
devices are detached and re-attached quickly. Thus, communication should
generally be avoided once hot-removal is detected.
While we already remove a device as soon as we detect its (hot-)removal,
the corresponding device driver may still attempt to communicate with
the device during teardown. This is especially critical as communication
failure may also extend to disabling of events, which is typically done
at that stage.
Add a flag to allow marking devices as hot-removed. This can then be
used during client driver teardown to check if any communication
attempts should be avoided.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-3-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
In SSAM subsystem drivers that handle both ACPI and SSAM-native client
devices, we may want to check whether we have a SSAM (native) client
device. Further, we may want to do this even when instantiation thereof
cannot happen due to CONFIG_SURFACE_AGGREGATOR_BUS=n. Currently, doing
so causes an error due to an undefined reference error due to
ssam_device_type being placed in the bus source unit.
Therefore, if CONFIG_SURFACE_AGGREGATOR_BUS is not defined, simply let
is_ssam_device() return false to prevent this error.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-2-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The def_bool y PMC_ATOM Kconfig option provides a couple of symbols used
by the code enabled by the X86_INTEL_LPSS option and it registers some
clocks. These clocks are only registered on Bay Trail, Cherry Trail and
Brasswell Intel SoCs and kernels targeting these SoCs must always have
the X86_INTEL_LPSS option enabled otherwise many things will not work.
Building the PMC_ATOM code on kernels which are not targeting the
mentioned SoCs and which do not have the X86_INTEL_LPSS enabled is
not useful.
This means that we can simplify things by replacing the PMC_ATOM Kconfig
option in Makefiles with X86_INTEL_LPSS and then drop the option.
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220503140207.101218-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
commit be9d73e649 ("platform/x86: hp-wmi: Fix 0x05 error code reported by
several WMI calls") and commit 12b19f14a2 ("platform/x86: hp-wmi: Fix
hp_wmi_read_int() reporting error (0x05)") cause ACPI BIOS Error (bug):
Attempt to CreateField of length zero (20211217/dsopcode-133) because of
the ACPI method HWMC, which unconditionally creates a Field of
size (insize*8) bits:
CreateField (Arg1, 0x80, (Local5 * 0x08), DAIN)
In cases where args->insize = 0, the Field size is 0, resulting in
an error.
Fix this by using zero insize only if 0x5 error code is returned
Tested on Omen 15 AMD (2020) board ID: 8786.
Fixes: be9d73e649 ("platform/x86: hp-wmi: Fix 0x05 error code reported by several WMI calls")
Signed-off-by: Bedant Patnaik <bedant.patnaik@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jorge Lopez <jorge.lopez2@hp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/41be46743d21c78741232a47bbb5f1cdbcc3d21e.camel@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
WMI queries fail on some devices where the ACPI method HWMC
unconditionally attempts to create Fields beyond the buffer
if the buffer is too small, this breaks essential features
such as power profiles:
CreateByteField (Arg1, 0x10, D008)
CreateByteField (Arg1, 0x11, D009)
CreateByteField (Arg1, 0x12, D010)
CreateDWordField (Arg1, 0x10, D032)
CreateField (Arg1, 0x80, 0x0400, D128)
In cases where args->data had zero length, ACPI BIOS Error
(bug): AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT, Field [D008] at bit
offset/length 128/8 exceeds size of target Buffer (128 bits)
(20211217/dsopcode-198) was obtained.
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT, Field [D009] at bit
offset/length 136/8 exceeds size of target Buffer (136bits)
(20211217/dsopcode-198)
The original code created a buffer size of 128 bytes regardless if
the WMI call required a smaller buffer or not. This particular
behavior occurs in older BIOS and reproduced in OMEN laptops. Newer
BIOS handles buffer sizes properly and meets the latest specification
requirements. This is the reason why testing with a dynamically
allocated buffer did not uncover any failures with the test systems at
hand.
This patch was tested on several OMEN, Elite, and Zbooks. It was
confirmed the patch resolves HPWMI_FAN GET/SET calls in an OMEN
Laptop 15-ek0xxx. No problems were reported when testing on several Elite
and Zbooks notebooks.
Fixes: 4b4967cbd2 ("platform/x86: hp-wmi: Changing bios_args.data to be dynamically allocated")
Signed-off-by: Jorge Lopez <jorge.lopez2@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220608212923.8585-2-jorge.lopez2@hp.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
