These tests have been developed in the hid-tools[0] tree for a while.
Now that we have a proper selftests/hid kernel entry and that the tests
are more reliable, it is time to directly include those in the kernel
tree.
This one gets skipped when run by vmtest.sh as we currently need to test
against actual kernel modules (.ko), not built-in to fetch the list
of supported devices.
[0] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libevdev/hid-tools
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
These tests have been developed in the hid-tools[0] tree for a while.
Now that we have a proper selftests/hid kernel entry and that the tests
are more reliable, it is time to directly include those in the kernel
tree.
I haven't imported all of hid-tools, the python module, but only the
tests related to the kernel. We can rely on pip to fetch the latest
hid-tools release, and then run the tests directly from the tree.
This should now be easier to request tests when something is not behaving
properly in the HID subsystem.
[0] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libevdev/hid-tools
Cc: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Having a default binary is simple enough, but this also means that
we need to keep the targets in sync as we are adding them in the Makefile.
So instead of doing that manual work, make vmtest.sh generic enough to
actually be capable of running 'make -C tools/testing/selftests/hid'.
The new image we use has make installed, which the base fedora image
doesn't.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
In __cmd_top(), perf_set_multithreaded() is used to enable
pthread_rwlock, thus down_read() and down_write () are not nops,
handling concurrency problems
Then 'perf top' uses perf_set_singlethreaded(), switching to the single
threaded phase, assuming that no thread concurrency will happen later.
However, a use after free problem could occur in the single threaded
phase, the concurrent procedure is this:
display_thread process_thread
-------------- --------------
thread__comm_len
-> thread__comm_str
-> __thread__comm_str(thread)
thread__delete
-> comm__free
-> comm_str__put
-> zfree(&cs->str)
-> thread->comm_len = strlen(comm);
Since in single thread phase, perf_singlethreaded is true, down_read()
and down_write() do nothing to avoid concurrency problems.
This patch moves the perf_set_singlethreaded() call to the function tail
to expand the multithreaded phase range, making display_thread() and
process_thread() concurrency safe.
Reviewed-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Hangliang Lai <laihangliang1@huawei.com>
Co-developed-by: Wenyu Liu <liuwenyu7@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com>
Cc: Hewenliang <hewenliang4@huawei.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230411013224.2079-1-laihangliang1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
An audit showed just this one problem with zfree(), fix it.
Fixes: 9fbc61f832 ("perf pmu: Add support for PMU capabilities")
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
This file already used zfree() in other places, so this just plugs some
leftovers.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Also include the missing linux/zalloc.h header directive.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Also remove one NULL test before free(), as it accepts a NULL arg and we
get one line shaved not doing it explicitely.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Also remove one NULL test before free(), as it accepts a NULL arg and we
get one line shaved not doing it explicitely.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Also remove one NULL test before free(), as it accepts a NULL arg and we
get one line shaved not doing it explicitely.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Now that kselftest.h can be used with nolibc convert the za-fork test to
use it. We do still have to open code ksft_print_msg() but that's not the
end of the world. Some of the advantage comes from using printf() which we
could have been using already.
This does change the output when tests are skipped, bringing it in line
with the standard kselftest output by removing the test name - we move
from
ok 0 skipped
to
ok 1 # SKIP fork_test
The old output was not following KTAP format for skips, and the
numbering was not standard or consistent with the reported plan.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Rather than providing headers for inclusion which replace any offered by
the system nolibc is provided in the form of a header which should be added
to the build via the compiler command line. In order to build with nolibc
we need to not include the standard C headers, especially not stdio.h where
the definitions of stdout, stdin and stderr will actively conflict with
nolibc.
Add an include guard which suppresses the inclusion of the standard headers
when building with nolibc, allowing us to build tests using the nolibc
headers. This allows us to avoid open coding of KTAP output for
selftests that need to use nolibc in order to test interfaces that are
controlled by libc.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
vprintf() is equivalent to vfprintf() to stdout so implement it as a simple
wrapper for the existing vfprintf(), allowing us to build kselftest.h.
Suggested-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Check both architectural rules and KVM's ABI for KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID
to ensure the supported xfeatures[1] don't violate any of them.
The architectural rules[2] and KVM's contract with userspace ensure for a
given feature, e.g. sse, avx, amx, etc... their associated xfeatures are
either all sets or none of them are set, and any dependencies are enabled
if needed.
[1] EDX:EAX of CPUID.(EAX=0DH,ECX=0)
[2] SDM vol 1, 13.3 ENABLING THE XSAVE FEATURE SET AND XSAVE-ENABLED
FEATURES
Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
[sean: expand comments, use a fancy X86_PROPERTY]
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230405004520.421768-7-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Take the XFeature mask in __vm_xsave_require_permission() instead of the
bit so that there's no need to define macros for both the bit and the
mask. Asserting that only a single bit is set and retrieving said bit
is easy enough via log2 helpers.
Opportunistically clean up the error message for the
ARCH_REQ_XCOMP_GUEST_PERM sanity check.
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230405004520.421768-5-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Add verifier log tests for BPF_BTF_LOAD command, which are very similar,
conceptually, to BPF_PROG_LOAD tests. These are two separate commands
dealing with verbose verifier log, so should be both tested separately.
Test that log_buf==NULL condition *does not* return -ENOSPC.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230406234205.323208-20-andrii@kernel.org
