rk3588-saradc isn't compatible with the rk3399-saradc variant,
hence, fix the following dtbs_check warning for 'oneOf' condition
failure.
DTC_CHK arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dtb
/home/shreeya/linux/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5b.dtb:
saradc@fec10000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed,
one must be fixed:
['rockchip,rk3588-saradc'] is too short
'rockchip,saradc' was expected
'rockchip,rk3066-tsadc' was expected
'rockchip,rk3399-saradc' was expected
Fixes: 2daf2ae979 ("dt-bindings: iio: adc: Add rockchip,rk3588-saradc string")
Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230610143601.173307-1-shreeya.patel@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
We are currently synchronizing every time the data timestamp with
the IT timestamp, leading to system jitter jamming timestamps.
To fix that and keep it simple, let's just synchronize when the
delta is bigger than the acceptable jitter, and keep
synchronization at the jitter value.
The result is much stable timestamps reflecting better the real
physical value. Example @50Hz delta timestamp,
* before: 20.123ms, 19.721ms, 20.023ms, 20.353ms, 19.821ms, ...
* after: 20.173ms, 20.173ms, 20.173ms, 20.40ms, 20.173ms, ...
Refactorize code and delete the unnecessary handling of multiple
FIFO data.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@tdk.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230522093210.817212-1-inv.git-commit@tdk.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The ROHM BU27008 is a sensor with 5 photodiodes (red, green, blue, clear
and IR) with four configurable channels. Red and green being always
available and two out of the rest three (blue, clear, IR) can be
selected to be simultaneously measured. Typical application is adjusting
LCD backlight of TVs, mobile phones and tablet PCs.
Add initial support for the ROHM BU27008 color sensor.
- raw_read() of RGB and clear channels
- triggered buffer w/ DRDY interrtupt
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2594162f0e44148cffb1fb05f1d6edfde6bd11bc.1683541225.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Add support for MLX90615 Infra Red Thermometer, which seems to be
the predecesor of MLX90614 . There are significant differences in
the register layout compared to MLX90614, but the functionality
of the device is virtually identical.
The following differences have been identified:
- RAM/EEPROM/SLEEP access opcodes are different
- RAM/EEPROM registers are at different offsets
- EEPROM emissivity and configuration registers are at different offsets
- EEPROM configuration register bits are shuffled around
- EEPROM emissivity settings are 14 bit on MLX90615 , 16 bit on MLX90614
- MLX90615 can only ever support one sensor, MLX90614 could support two
- FIR filter is set to fixed settings on MLX90615
- IIR filter coefficients are different
This patch fills in the MLX90615 specific description and quirk handling.
The IIR filter coefficients were provided by Melexis as follows:
0b0000 - Forbidden value
0b0001 - 100% - settling time = refresh rate = 205ms (around 5Hz)
0b0010 - 50% - settling time = 2050ms (around 0.5Hz)
0b0011 - 33% - settling time = 36900ms (around 0.3Hz)
0b0100 - 25% - settling time = 5125ms (around 0.2Hz)
0b0101 - 20% - settling time = 6355ms (around 0.15Hz)
0b0110 - 17% - settling time = 7790ms (around 0.13Hz)
0b0111 - 14% - settling time = 9225ms (around 0.1Hz)
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Acked-by: Crt Mori <cmo@melexis.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230510102251.10118-6-marex@denx.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Factor out all the differences between MLX90614 and other similar chips
into a structure which describes the chip and allows abstracting out the
differences from the driver code. No functional change.
This patch moves all the RAM and EEPROM IO opcodes into the descriptor
structure and combines them, instead of combining the opcode and offset
in macros.
Acked-by: Crt Mori <cmo@melexis.com>
Tested-by: Crt Mori <cmo@melexis.com>
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230510102251.10118-5-marex@denx.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Honeywell mprls0025pa is a pressure sensor series. There are many
different models with different pressure ranges, units and transfer
functions.
The range and transfer function need to be set up in the dt. Therefore
new properties honeywell,pmin-pascal, honeywell,pmax-pascal,
honeywell,transfer-function are introduced.
Add dt-bindings.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Klinger <ak@it-klinger.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZGNpve4ux5KJ3BNQ@arbad
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Set the read_label() callback to return a friendly name provided in DT
(firmware), in order to make in_{therm,voltage}X_label attributes show
up in sysfs for userspace to consume a channel name. This is
particularly useful for custom thermistors being attached to otherwise
generically named GPIOs, where the name is known by the board DT.
If the channel name isn't set in DT, use the datasheet_name hardcoded in
the driver instead.
Note that this doesn't fall back to fwnode_get_name() as that provides
suboptimally readable names, with an @xx address suffix from board DT.
Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230502-iio-adc-propagate-fw-node-label-v3-5-6be5db6e6b5a@somainline.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Since the migration to fwnode_get_name in commit 4f47a236a2 ("iio:
adc: qcom-spmi-adc5: convert to device properties") the resulting
adc5_channel_prop::channel_name (renamed from datasheet_name in the
previous patch) - which is propagated into iio_chan_spec::extend_name -
was containing the DT node name including @xx suffix if a "label"
property is not present, while adc5_channels::datasheet_name was thus
far set by the macros but always remained unread. Put it to use instead
of using a confusing name containing @xx in sysfs filenames (again, when
"label" is not set).
Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230502-iio-adc-propagate-fw-node-label-v3-3-6be5db6e6b5a@somainline.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
As mentioned and discussed in [1] extend_name should not be used for
full channel labels (and most drivers seem to only use it to express a
short type of a channel) as this affects sysfs filenames, while the
label name is supposed to be extracted from the *_label sysfs file
instead. This appears to have been unclear to some drivers as
extend_name is also used when read_label is unset, achieving an initial
goal of providing sensible names in *_label sysfs files without noticing
that sysfs filenames are (negatively and likely unintentionally)
affected as well.
Point readers of iio_chan_spec::extend_name to iio_info::read_label by
mentioning deprecation and side-effects of this field.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221221223432.si2aasbleiicayfl@SoMainline.org/
Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230502-iio-adc-propagate-fw-node-label-v3-1-6be5db6e6b5a@somainline.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Devices which may take a while to initialize during probe and which have
no strong reason to probe synchronously can request asynchronous probing
as default probe strategy. This can speed-up start times on some
platforms.
The BU27034 gets probe delayed for at least two reasons. It enables the
supply regulator, (which is likely to have ramp-up delay if it was
disabled) and additionally it delays while the sensor itself is
initializing.
Changing to asynchronous probing may cause problems. Some of which are
discussed in:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/06db017f-e985-4434-8d1d-02ca2100cca0@sirena.org.uk/
Enabling async probing for the ROHM BU27034 should be fairly safe to try
though as there is no in-tree users for it yet. If the async probing
appears to be an issue we can switch easily back to synchronous (or
better yet, fix the actual problem).
Enable asynchronous probing for BU27034.
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e7088793e1868c77b1894b30cd026e8ed043ea7c.1683185765.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
