wifi: rtw88: 8822c: Don't process RF path C in query_phy_status_page{0,1}

Replace <= with < in the loops in query_phy_status_page{0,1}(). They
were processing data related to RF path C, which this chip doesn't have.
The only bad effect seems to be that the phy_info file in debugfs was
printing unexpected values for RF path C.

Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/ee30b95f-bc68-4711-9b15-cf5fd23c3c48@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Bitterblue Smith
2026-06-10 16:01:35 +03:00
committed by Ping-Ke Shih
parent 1b4cd55626
commit a4a2c1a103

View File

@@ -2584,7 +2584,7 @@ static void query_phy_status_page0(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u8 *phy_status,
pkt_stat->rx_power[RF_PATH_A] = rx_power[RF_PATH_A];
pkt_stat->rx_power[RF_PATH_B] = rx_power[RF_PATH_B];
for (path = 0; path <= rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num; path++) {
for (path = 0; path < rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num; path++) {
rssi = rtw_phy_rf_power_2_rssi(&pkt_stat->rx_power[path], 1);
dm_info->rssi[path] = rssi;
}
@@ -2644,7 +2644,7 @@ static void query_phy_status_page1(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u8 *phy_status,
pkt_stat->cfo_tail[RF_PATH_A] = GET_PHY_STAT_P1_CFO_TAIL_A(phy_status);
pkt_stat->cfo_tail[RF_PATH_B] = GET_PHY_STAT_P1_CFO_TAIL_B(phy_status);
for (path = 0; path <= rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num; path++) {
for (path = 0; path < rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num; path++) {
rssi = rtw_phy_rf_power_2_rssi(&pkt_stat->rx_power[path], 1);
dm_info->rssi[path] = rssi;
if (path == RF_PATH_A) {