From a4a2c1a1032f8254e18b44cfdbe7e2be433b758f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bitterblue Smith Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:01:35 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] wifi: rtw88: 8822c: Don't process RF path C in query_phy_status_page{0,1} Replace <= with < in the loops in query_phy_status_page{0,1}(). They were processing data related to RF path C, which this chip doesn't have. The only bad effect seems to be that the phy_info file in debugfs was printing unexpected values for RF path C. Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih Link: https://patch.msgid.link/ee30b95f-bc68-4711-9b15-cf5fd23c3c48@gmail.com --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c index 244c8026479c..80c9f0c11e5c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c @@ -2584,7 +2584,7 @@ static void query_phy_status_page0(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u8 *phy_status, pkt_stat->rx_power[RF_PATH_A] = rx_power[RF_PATH_A]; pkt_stat->rx_power[RF_PATH_B] = rx_power[RF_PATH_B]; - for (path = 0; path <= rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num; path++) { + for (path = 0; path < rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num; path++) { rssi = rtw_phy_rf_power_2_rssi(&pkt_stat->rx_power[path], 1); dm_info->rssi[path] = rssi; } @@ -2644,7 +2644,7 @@ static void query_phy_status_page1(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u8 *phy_status, pkt_stat->cfo_tail[RF_PATH_A] = GET_PHY_STAT_P1_CFO_TAIL_A(phy_status); pkt_stat->cfo_tail[RF_PATH_B] = GET_PHY_STAT_P1_CFO_TAIL_B(phy_status); - for (path = 0; path <= rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num; path++) { + for (path = 0; path < rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num; path++) { rssi = rtw_phy_rf_power_2_rssi(&pkt_stat->rx_power[path], 1); dm_info->rssi[path] = rssi; if (path == RF_PATH_A) {