mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-06-04 09:43:50 -04:00
Sashiko points out that unprivileged user can frequently
call ip_vs_flush() or ip_vs_del_service() to trigger
svc_table_changes updates that can lead to infinite loop
in ip_vs_dst_event(). This can also happen if the user
triggers frequent table resizing without deleting all
services. We should also consider the possible effects
if the user triggers many NETDEV_DOWN events.
One way to solve it is to hold svc_resize_sem in
ip_vs_dst_event() but this can block the dev notifier
during the whole resizing process.
Instead, use new rw_semaphore svc_replace_sem to protect just
the svc_table replacement which is a short code section.
Then hold svc_replace_sem in ip_vs_dst_event() to serialize
with replacing the svc_table. As result, loop is avoided
as there is no need to repeat the table walking from the
start. By this way changes in svc_table_changes can happen
only when all services are removed and all dev references
dropped which allows us to abort the table walking.
As IP_VS_WORK_SVC_NORESIZE is the flag used to stop the
svc_resize_work under service_mutex, we should check only
this flag often but not while under service_mutex.
To remove the mutex_trylock() for service_mutex in the
second phase where the resizer installs the new table
after rehashing, we will avoid holding the service_mutex
there. As result, the code in configuration context which
is under service_mutex should access ipvs->svc_table under
RCU because it can be replaced at anytime and released
after a RCU grace period. As for ip_vs_zero_all(), it needs
different solution as a table walker which can escape
single RCU read-side critical section: to hold the
svc_replace_sem to prevent table to be replaced.
In ip_vs_status_show() prefer to hold svc_replace_sem
to avoid many loops, just detect if the svc_table is
removed.
Prefer the newly attached table for the u_thresh/l_thresh
checks to know when to grow/shrink while adding or deleting
services because the new table size is based on the latest
parameters.
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260505001648.360569-1-pablo%40netfilter.org
Fixes: 840aac3d90 ("ipvs: use resizable hash table for services")
Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>