Some of the regulators must be always-on to ensure correct operation of
the system, e.g. PM8916 L2 for the LPDDR RAM, L5 for most digital I/O
and L7 for the CPU PLL (strictly speaking the CPU PLL might only need
an active-only vote but this is not supported for regulators in
mainline currently).
The RPM firmware seems to enforce that internally, these supplies stay
on even if we vote for them to power off (and there is no other
processor running). This means it's pointless to keep sending
enable/disable requests because they will just be ignored.
Also, drivers are much more likely to get a wrong impression of the
regulator status, because regulator_is_enabled() will return false when
there are no users, even though the regulator is always on.
Describe this properly by marking the regulators as always-on.
The same changes was already made for MSM8916 in commit 8bbd35771f
("arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916-pm8916: Mark always-on regulators").
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230530-msm8939-regulators-v1-8-a3c3ac833567@gerhold.net
Right now each MSM8939 device has a huge block of regulator constraints
with allowed voltages for each regulator. For lack of better
documentation these voltages are often copied as-is from the vendor
device tree, without much extra thought.
Unfortunately, the voltages in the vendor device trees are often
misleading or even wrong, e.g. because:
- There is a large voltage range allowed and the actual voltage is
only set somewhere hidden in some messy vendor driver. This is often
the case for pm8916_{l14,l15,l16} because they have a broad range of
1.8-3.3V by default.
- The voltage is actually wrong but thanks to the voltage constraints
in the RPM firmware it still ends up applying the correct voltage.
To have proper regulator constraints it is important to review them in
context of the usage. The current setup in the MSM8939 device trees
makes this quite hard because each device duplicates the standard
voltages for components of the SoC and mixes those with minor
device-specific additions and dummy voltages for completely unused
regulators.
The actual usage of the regulators for the SoC components is in
msm8939-pm8916.dtsi, so it can and should also define the related
voltage constraints. These are not board-specific but defined in the
MSM8939/PM8916 specification. There is no documentation available for
MSM8939 but in practice it's almost identical to MSM8916.
Note that this commit does not make any functional change. All used
regulators still have the same regulator constraints as before. Unused
regulators do not have regulator constraints anymore because most of
these were too broad or even entirely wrong. They should be added back
with proper voltage constraints when there is an actual usage.
The same changes were already made for MSM8916 in commit b0a8f16ae4
("arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Define regulator constraints next to usage").
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230530-msm8939-regulators-v1-7-a3c3ac833567@gerhold.net
The regulator constraints for the MSM8939 devices were originally taken
from Qualcomm's msm-3.10 vendor device tree (for lack of better
documentation). Unfortunately it turns out that Qualcomm's voltages are
slightly off as well and do not match the voltage constraints applied
by the RPM firmware.
This means that we sometimes request a specific voltage but the RPM
firmware actually applies a much lower or higher voltage. This is
particularly critical for pm8916_l11 which is used as SD card VMMC
regulator: The SD card can choose a voltage from the current range of
1.8 - 2.95V. If it chooses to run at 1.8V we pretend that this is fine
but the RPM firmware will still silently end up configuring 2.95V.
This can be easily reproduced with a multimeter or by checking the
SPMI hardware registers of the regulator.
Apply the same change as for MSM8916 in commit 355750828c ("arm64:
dts: qcom: msm8916: Fix regulator constraints") and make the voltages
match the actual "specified range" in the PM8916 Device Specification
which is enforced by the RPM firmware.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230530-msm8939-regulators-v1-5-a3c3ac833567@gerhold.net
MSM8916 and MSM8939 are pin-compatible and should have exactly the same
pinctrl definitions. Still, having pinctrl separated to a -pins.dtsi
is not typical anymore for Qualcomm platforms upstream. Since Bjorn
specifically requested having the MSM8939 pinctrl inside msm8939.dtsi
lets move the MSM8916 definitions to msm8916.dtsi as well to have
a consistent location.
While at it sort the nodes and drop unnecessary empty lines.
Note that in almost all cases changes to MSM8916 pinctrl should also be
applied to MSM8939 pinctrl (and vice versa). Right now they are back in
sync again and completely identical.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230529-msm8916-pinctrl-v1-6-11f540b51c93@gerhold.net
The audio pinctrl in MSM8916/MSM8939 is very similar but still has
subtle differences, e.g. &cdc_pdm_lines_act on MSM8916 vs
&cdc_pdm_lines_default on MSM8939.
Make this consistent and use the chance to cleanup all of the audio
pinctrl: Drop unneeded outer nodes and replace the names taken over
from the vendor kernel with more clear ones that are similar to the
actual pinctrl function.
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230529-msm8916-pinctrl-v1-4-11f540b51c93@gerhold.net
MSM8939 has the SDC pinctrl consolidated in two &sdcN_default and
&sdcN_sleep states, while MSM8916 has all pins separated. Make this
consistent by consolidating them for MSM8916 well.
Use this as a chance to define default pinctrl in the SoC.dtsi and only
let boards that add additional definitions (such as cd-gpios) override it.
For MSM8939 just make the label consistent with the other pinctrl
definitions (they do not have a _state suffix).
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230529-msm8916-pinctrl-v1-2-11f540b51c93@gerhold.net
The current SD card detect pinctrl setup configures bias-pull-up for
the "default" (active) case and bias-disable for the "sleep" case.
Before commit b5c833b703 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Set IO pins in low power
state during suspend") the pull up was permanently active. Since then
it is only active when a valid SD card is inserted.
This does not really make sense: For an active-low CD, the pull up is
needed to pull the GPIO high when the card is not inserted. When the
card gets inserted CD is shorted to ground (low). This means right now
the pull-up is removed exactly when it is needed to detect the next
card insertion. Generally, applying different bias for CD does not
really make sense. It should always stay the same so card removals and
insertions can be detected properly.
The reason why card detection still works fine in practice is that most
boards seem to have external pull up on the CD pin. However, this means
that there is no need to configure an internal pull-up at all and we
can keep bias-disable permanently.
There are also some boards with different CD polarity (acer-a1-724) and
with different GPIO number (huawei-g7). All in all this makes it
obvious that the CD pin is board-specific and the pinctrl for it should
be defined in the board DT.
Move it to the boards that need it and use bias-disable permanently for
the boards that seem to have external pull-up. The vendor device tree
for msm8939-sony-xperia-kanuti-tulip suggests that it needs the
internal pull-up permanently [1] so it gets bias-pull-up to be sure.
[1]: 57b5050e34/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/msm8939-kanuti_tulip.dtsi (L634-L636)
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230529-msm8916-pinctrl-v1-1-11f540b51c93@gerhold.net
The framebuffer configuration for edo pdx203, written in edo dtsi (which
is overwritten in pdx206 dts for its smaller panel) has to use a
1096x2560 configuration as this is what the panel (and framebuffer area)
has been initialized to. Downstream userspace also has access to (and
uses) this 2.5k mode by default, and only switches the panel to 4k when
requested.
This is similar to commit be8de06dc3 ("arm64: dts: qcom:
sm8150-kumano: Panel framebuffer is 2.5k instead of 4k") which fixed the
same for the previous generation Sony platform.
Fixes: 69cdb97ef6 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Add support for SONY Xperia 1 II / 5 II (Edo platform)")
Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606211418.587676-1-marijn.suijten@somainline.org
