The ADXL380/ADXL382 is a low noise density, low power, 3-axis
accelerometer with selectable measurement ranges. The ADXL380 supports
the +/-4 g, +/-8 g, and +/-16 g ranges, and the ADXL382 supports
+/-15 g, +/-30 g and +/-60 g ranges.
The ADXL380/ADXL382 offers industry leading noise, enabling precision
applications with minimal calibration. The low noise, and low power
ADXL380/ADXL382 enables accurate measurement in an environment with
high vibration, heart sounds and audio.
In addition to its low power consumption, the ADXL380/ADXL382 has many
features to enable true system level performance. These include a
built-in micropower temperature sensor, single / double / triple tap
detection and a state machine to prevent a false triggering. In
addition, the ADXL380/ADXL382 has provisions for external control of
the sampling time and/or an external clock.
Signed-off-by: Ramona Gradinariu <ramona.gradinariu@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240708104114.29894-2-antoniu.miclaus@analog.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Add the coefficients for the IIO standard units and the IIO value
inside the chip_info structure.
Move the calculations for the IIO unit compatibility from inside the
read_{temp,press,humid}() functions and move them to the general
read_raw() function.
In this way, all the data for the calculation of the value are
located in the chip_info structure of the respective sensor.
Signed-off-by: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Adam Rizkalla <ajarizzo@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240628171726.124852-2-vassilisamir@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The ROHM BU27034 light sensor has two data channels for measuring
different frequencies of light. The result from these channels is
combined into Lux value while the raw channel values are reported via
intensity channels.
Both of the intensity channels have adjustable gain setting which
impacts the scale of the raw channels. Eg, doubling the gain will double
the values read from the raw channels, which halves the scale value. The
integration time can also be set for the sensor. This does also have an
impact to the scale of the intensity channels because increasing the
integration time will also increase the values reported via the raw
channels.
Impact of integration time to the scale and the fact that the scale value
does not start from '1', can make it hard for a human reader to compute the
gain values based on the scale.
Add read-only HARDWAREGAIN to help debugging.
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/ec349847cc994f3bd632e99b408a31e7c70581d0.1720176341.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The ROHM BU27034NUC was cancelled and BU27034ANUC is replacing this
sensor. These senors aren't compatible from the software point of view.
According to ROHM, the BU27034NUC was never mass-produced. Hence dropping
the BU27034NUC support and using this driver to support BU27034ANUC
should not be a problem to users. We however need to ensure than people
who use old kernel with the old BU27034NUC driver don't get the old
driver probed for the new sensor.
Prepare to use the BU27034NUC driver to support the new BU27034ANUC and
change the compatible to prevent probing the old driver with the new
sensor.
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/ed8b963b0cd3a84c06a494c79969a136d5abcf92.1720176341.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The BU27034NUC was cancelled before it entered mass production. It was
replaced by a new variant BU27034ANUC (note, added 'A'). The new
variant gained a few significant changes, like removal of the 3.rd data
channel and dropping some of the gain settings. This means that, from
software point of view these ICs are incompatible. Lux calculation based
on the data from the sensors needs to be done differently, and on the
BU27034ANUC the channel 3 data is missing. Also, the gain setting
differencies matter.
Unfortunately, the identification register was not changed so there is no
safe way for the software to distinguish the variants.
According to the ROHM HQ engineers, the old BU27034NUC should not be
encountered in the wild. Hence it makes sense to remove the support for
the old BU27034NUC and add support for the new BU27034ANUC. Change the
compatible in order to not load the incompatible old driver for new sensor
(or, if someone had the old sensor, the new driver for it).
Drop the compatible for old sensor which should not be in the wild and
add a new compatible for the new model with accurate model suffix
'anuc'. Rename the file to match the new compatible.
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/c39f9c67b3c07a27d7a13109c7b69cff9cfd2b9b.1720176341.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The reading of the pressure and humidity value, requires an update of the
t_fine variable which happens by reading the temperature value.
So the bme680_read_{press/humid}() functions of the above sensors are
internally calling the equivalent bme680_read_temp() function in order to
update the t_fine value. By just looking at the code this relation is a
bit hidden and is not easy to understand why those channels are not
independent.
This commit tries to clear these thing a bit by splitting the
bme680_{read/compensate}_{temp/press/humid}() to the following:
i. bme680_read_{temp/press/humid}_adc(): read the raw value from the
sensor.
ii. bme680_calc_t_fine(): calculate the t_fine variable.
iii. bme680_get_t_fine(): get the t_fine variable.
iv. bme680_compensate_{temp/press/humid}(): compensate the adc values and
return the calculated value.
v. bme680_read_{temp/press/humid}(): combine calls of the aforementioned
functions to return the requested value.
Signed-off-by: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240609233826.330516-16-vassilisamir@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Whenever the sensor is set to forced mode, a TPHG cycle is triggered and
the values of temperature, pressure, humidity and gas become ready to be
read.
The setup of the forced mode to trigger measurements was located inside
the read_{temp/gas}() functions. This was not posing a functional problem
since read_{humid/press}() are internally calling read_temp() so the
forced mode is set through this call.
This is not very clear and it is kind of hidden that regardless of the
measurement, the setup of the forced mode needs to happen before any
measurement.
Signed-off-by: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240609233826.330516-15-vassilisamir@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
There is no need to explicitly configure the gas measurement registers
every time a gas measurement takes place. These are initial configurations
which are written in the beginning and they are not changed throughout
the lifetime of the driver.
If in the future, the device starts to support multiple configuration
profiles with variable heater duration and heater temperature, then they
could become members of the ->read_avail().
Signed-off-by: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240609233826.330516-14-vassilisamir@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Add mutexes in the {read/write}_raw() functions of the device to guard the
read/write of data from/to the device. This is necessary because for any
operation other than temperature, multiple reads need to take place from
the device. Even though regmap has a locking by itself, it won't protect us
from multiple applications trying to read at the same time temperature and
pressure since the pressure reading includes an internal temperature
reading and there is nothing to ensure that this temperature+pressure
reading will happen sequentially without any other operation interfering
in the meantime.
Fixes: 1b3bd85927 ("iio: chemical: Add support for Bosch BME680 sensor")
Signed-off-by: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240609233826.330516-2-vassilisamir@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Switching to guard simplifies the code and avoids to take care to
unlock the mutex in case of premature return.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Stols <gstols@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The binding's documentation specifies that "As the line is active low, it
should be marked GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW". However, in the driver, it was handled
the opposite way. This commit sets the driver's behaviour in sync with the
documentation
Fixes: 722407a4e8 ("staging:iio:ad7606: Use GPIO descriptor API")
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Stols <gstols@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
gpiod_set_array_value was misused here: the implementation relied on the
assumption that an unsigned long was required for each gpio, while the
function expects a bit array stored in "as much unsigned long as needed
for storing one bit per GPIO", i.e it is using a bit field.
This leaded to incorrect parameter passed to gpiod_set_array_value, that
would set 1 value instead of 3.
It also prevents to select the software mode correctly for the AD7606B.
Fixes: d2a415c86c ("iio: adc: ad7606: Add support for AD7606B ADC")
Fixes: 41f71e5e7d ("staging: iio: adc: ad7606: Use find_closest() macro")
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Stols <gstols@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Since the driver supports several parts that present differences in
their layout and behaviour, it is necessary to describe the differences
from one chip to another.
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Stols <gstols@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
If there's only one possible scale, there's no way to change the Vref
select in the device so avoid reading the register in ad9467_get_scale().
In this case, it makes no sense to provide the .read_available()
callback nor allowing for writing the scale attribute.
Note this is in preparation for supporting a new device that only has
one possible scale.
Signed-off-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240704-dev-iio-ad9467-new-devs-v1-3-f1adfee921f7@analog.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Add new variables to the per chip info structure:
* test_points: Number of valid test points for calibration;
* has_dco_invert: Supports inverting DCO (Data clock output) polarity;
* dco_en: Specicic mask to enable DCO delays.
This is in preparation for supporting new parts with subtle differences
in how to configure the hardware.
Note that with the new test_points variable, we also add a new
calib_map_size to 'struct ad9467_state' so we know our map size
depending on how many test points we have and if we can run the
calibration in the inverted state or not.
Signed-off-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240704-dev-iio-ad9467-new-devs-v1-2-f1adfee921f7@analog.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The calibration process mixes the support for calibrating multiple
channels with only having one channel. Some paths do have 'num_channels'
into account while others don't.
As of now, the driver only supports devices with one channel so the
above is not really a problem. That said, we'll add support for devices
with more than one channel, hence let's properly make the calibration
process to work with it.
Signed-off-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240704-dev-iio-ad9467-new-devs-v1-1-f1adfee921f7@analog.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
