icl and tgl are still affected by the modulo 4 PLANE_OFFSET.y
underrun issue. Reject such configurations on all gen9+ platforms.
Can be reproduced easily with the following sequence of
hardware poking:
while {
write FBC_CTL.enable=1
wait for vblank
write PLANE_OFFSET .x=0 .y=32
write PLANE_SURF
wait for vblank
# if PLANE_OFFSET.y is multiple of 4 the underrun won't happen
write PLANE_OFFSET .x=0 .y=31
write PLANE_SURF
wait for vblank
# extra vblank wait is required here presumably
# to get FBC into the proper state
wait for vblank
write FBC_CTL.enable=0
# underrun happens some time after FBC disable
wait for vblank
}
Both 8888 and 565 pixel formats and all tilinga formats
seem affected. Reproduced on KBL/GLK/ICL/TGL. BDW confirmed
not affected.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/792
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191213133453.22152-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Fix several issues with DSC power domains that did not take DSI
transcoders into account:
- On TGL+ we need to use PW2 for DSC on pipe A, not transcoder A. There
is no longer an eDP transcoder, but there are two DSI transcoders
which may be connected to pipe A.
- On TGL+ we need to use the pipe, not transcoder, power domains for DSC
on pipes other than A. Again, there are DSI transcoders.
- On ICL we need to use PW2 for DSC also for DSI transcoders, not just
for the eDP transcoder.
Using is_pipe_dsc() also adds the warning about ICL pipe A DSC, which
does not exist.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191212134728.18432-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Avoid rc6 counter going backward in close to 0% RC6 scenarios like:
15.005477996 114,246,613 ns i915/rc6-residency/
16.005876662 667,657 ns i915/rc6-residency/
17.006131417 7,286 ns i915/rc6-residency/
18.006615031 18,446,744,073,708,914,688 ns i915/rc6-residency/
19.007158361 18,446,744,073,709,447,168 ns i915/rc6-residency/
20.007806498 0 ns i915/rc6-residency/
21.008227495 1,440,403 ns i915/rc6-residency/
There are two aspects to this fix.
First is not assuming rc6 value zero means GT is asleep since that can
also mean GPU is fully busy and we do not want to enter the estimation
path in that case.
Second is ensuring monotonicity on the estimation path itself. I suspect
what is happening is with extremely rapid park/unpark cycles we get no
updates on the real rc6 and therefore have to careful not to
unconditionally trust use last known real rc6 when creating a new
estimation.
v2:
* Simplify logic by not tracking the estimate but last reported value.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: 16ffe73c18 ("drm/i915/pmu: Use GT parked for estimating RC6 while asleep")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> # v1
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217142057.1000-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Move all of haswell_crtc_disable() into the encoder
.post_disable() hooks. Now we're left with just
calling the .disable() and .post_disable() hooks
back to back.
I chose to move the code into the .post_disable() hook instead
of the .disable() hook as most of the sequence is currently
implemented in the .post_disable() hook.
We should collapse it all down to just one hook and then the
encoders can drive the modeset sequence fully. But that may
need some further refactoring as we currently call the
ddi .post_disable() hook from mst code and we can't just
replace that with a call to the ddi .disable() hook.
Should also follow up with similar treatment for the enable
sequence but let's start here where it's easier.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191213195217.15168-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
We have a few places where we want to reset a crtc state to its
default values. Let's add a helper for that. We'll need the new
__drm_atomic_helper_crtc_state_reset() helper for this to allow
us to just reset the state itself without clobbering the
crtc->state pointer.
And while at it let's zero out the whole thing, except a few
choice member which we'll mark as "invalid". And thanks to this
we can now nuke intel_crtc_init_scalers().
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191107142417.11107-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
The GuC supports having multiple CT buffer pairs and we designed our
implementation with that in mind. However, the different channels are not
processed in parallel within the GuC, so there is very little advantage
in having multiple channels (independent locks?), compared to the
drawbacks (one channel can starve the other if messages keep being
submitted to it). Given this, it is unlikely we'll ever add a second
channel and therefore we can simplify our code by removing the
flexibility.
v2: split substructure grouping to separate patch, improve docs (Michal)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The only difference from the GuC POV between guc_communication_stop and
guc_communication_disable is that the former can be called after GuC
has been reset. Instead of having two separate paths, we can just skip
the call into GuC in the disabling path and re-use that.
Note that by using the disable() path instead of the stop() one there
are two additional changes in SW side for the stop path:
- interrupts are now disabled before disabling the CT, which is ok
because we do not want interrupts with CT disabled;
- guc_get_mmio_msg() is called in the stop case as well, which is ok
because if there are errors before the reset we do want to record
them.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Since commit e5dadff4b0 ("drm/i915: Protect request retirement with
timeline->mutex"), the request retirement can happen outside of the
struct_mutex serialised only by the timeline->mutex. We drop the
timeline->mutex on submitting the request (i915_request_add) so after
that point, it is liable to be freed. Make sure our local reference is
kept alive until we have finished attaching it to the signalers. (Note
that this erodes the argument that i915_request_add should consume the
reference, but that is a slightly larger patch!)
Fixes: e5dadff4b0 ("drm/i915: Protect request retirement with timeline->mutex")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217134729.3297818-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
At least Bay Trail (BYT) and Cherry Trail (CHT) devices can use 1 of 2
different PWM controllers for controlling the LCD's backlight brightness.
Either the one integrated into the PMIC or the one integrated into the
SoC (the 1st LPSS PWM controller).
So far in the LPSS code on BYT we have skipped registering the LPSS PWM
controller "pwm_backlight" lookup entry when a Crystal Cove PMIC is
present, assuming that in this case the PMIC PWM controller will be used.
On CHT we have been relying on only 1 of the 2 PWM controllers being
enabled in the DSDT at the same time; and always registered the lookup.
So far this has been working, but the correct way to determine which PWM
controller needs to be used is by checking a bit in the VBT table and
recently I've learned about 2 different BYT devices:
Point of View MOBII TAB-P800W
Acer Switch 10 SW5-012
Which use a Crystal Cove PMIC, yet the LCD is connected to the SoC/LPSS
PWM controller (and the VBT correctly indicates this), so here our old
heuristics fail.
This commit fixes using the wrong PWM controller on these devices by
calling pwm_get() for the right PWM controller based on the
VBT dsi.config.pwm_blc bit.
Note this is part of a series which contains 2 other patches which renames
the PWM lookup for the 1st SoC/LPSS PWM from "pwm_backlight" to
"pwm_pmic_backlight" and the PWM lookup for the Crystal Cove PMIC PWM
from "pwm_backlight" to "pwm_pmic_backlight".
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191216202906.1662893-4-hdegoede@redhat.com
At least Bay Trail (BYT) and Cherry Trail (CHT) devices can use 1 of 2
different PWM controllers for controlling the LCD's backlight brightness.
Either the one integrated into the PMIC or the one integrated into the
SoC (the 1st LPSS PWM controller).
So far in the LPSS code on BYT we have skipped registering the LPSS PWM
controller "pwm_backlight" lookup entry when a Crystal Cove PMIC is
present, assuming that in this case the PMIC PWM controller will be used.
On CHT we have been relying on only 1 of the 2 PWM controllers being
enabled in the DSDT at the same time; and always registered the lookup.
So far this has been working, but the correct way to determine which PWM
controller needs to be used is by checking a bit in the VBT table and
recently I've learned about 2 different BYT devices:
Point of View MOBII TAB-P800W
Acer Switch 10 SW5-012
Which use a Crystal Cove PMIC, yet the LCD is connected to the SoC/LPSS
PWM controller (and the VBT correctly indicates this), so here our old
heuristics fail.
Since only the i915 driver has access to the VBT, this commit renames
the "pwm_backlight" lookup entries for the Crystal Cove PMIC's PWM
controller to "pwm_pmic_backlight" so that the i915 driver can do a
pwm_get() for the right controller depending on the VBT bit, instead of
the i915 driver relying on a "pwm_backlight" lookup getting registered
which magically points to the right controller.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191216202906.1662893-3-hdegoede@redhat.com
At least Bay Trail (BYT) and Cherry Trail (CHT) devices can use 1 of 2
different PWM controllers for controlling the LCD's backlight brightness.
Either the one integrated into the PMIC or the one integrated into the
SoC (the 1st LPSS PWM controller).
So far in the LPSS code on BYT we have skipped registering the LPSS PWM
controller "pwm_backlight" lookup entry when a Crystal Cove PMIC is
present, assuming that in this case the PMIC PWM controller will be used.
On CHT we have been relying on only 1 of the 2 PWM controllers being
enabled in the DSDT at the same time; and always registered the lookup.
So far this has been working, but the correct way to determine which PWM
controller needs to be used is by checking a bit in the VBT table and
recently I've learned about 2 different BYT devices:
Point of View MOBII TAB-P800W
Acer Switch 10 SW5-012
Which use a Crystal Cove PMIC, yet the LCD is connected to the SoC/LPSS
PWM controller (and the VBT correctly indicates this), so here our old
heuristics fail.
Since only the i915 driver has access to the VBT, this commit renames
the "pwm_backlight" lookup entries for the 1st BYT/CHT LPSS PWM controller
to "pwm_soc_backlight" so that the i915 driver can do a pwm_get() for
the right controller depending on the VBT bit, instead of the i915 driver
relying on a "pwm_backlight" lookup getting registered which magically
points to the right controller.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191216202906.1662893-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
