We now have three different reasons for calling
intel_pfit_compute_config():
- actual pfit scaling/centering
- YCbCr 4:2:0 output
- sharpness filter
So let's just call intel_pfit_compute_config() unconditionally
from both the DP and HDMI code. Both gmch and ilk+ pfit code
should be capable of judging whether anything actually
needs the pfit.
The only slightly questionable thing in the gmch code is
the dithering knob, but that's only a thing on gen2/3 which
don't even have HDMI/DP outputs, and so not an issue here.
Reviewed-by: Michał Grzelak <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nemesa Garg <nemesa.garg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260407175244.19654-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
VESA backlight enable is possible when
BACKLIGHT_AUX_ENABLE_CAPABLE is true via AUX command or when
BACKLIGHT_PIN_ENABLE_CAPABLE is true via eDP connector pin.
Similarly, backlight brightness adjustment can be
done via AUX-based control or PWM pin-based control.
It means there can be three configurations:
1) Full AUX-based: Enable and adjustment both via AUX. We currently
support this (apart from the AUX luminance-based backlight control).
2) Hybrid: Enable via the BL_ENABLE pin, adjustment via either AUX or
PWM.
3) Fully PWM pin-based: Enable via the BL_ENABLE pin, adjustment via
PWM.
Since that only 1 is supported as of now we need to make
sure we do not try to manipulate backlight when
BACKLIGHT_AUX_ENABLE_CAPABLE is not set.
Also fix return value when condition is not fulfilled.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/work_items/15907
Fixes: 0fb03890d1 ("drm/i915/backlight: Check if VESA backlight is possible")
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260407030710.1440046-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
When the pipe_src width or height are greater than adjusted_mode hdisplay
and vdisplay, computed x and y offsets for center mode can be negative.
Writing negative values into the pch_fit registers result in a state error.
Add a check to clamp these values so that they are never negative.
v2: Compare in terms of pipe_src width and height.[Ville]
v3: Change width/height to pipe_src_w/h in logging. [Ville]
Signed-off-by: Nemesa Garg <nemesa.garg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260402061310.111073-1-nemesa.garg@intel.com
Unused bandwidth can be used by external display agents for Panel Replay
enabled DP panel during idleness with link on. Enable source to replace
dummy data from the display with data from another agent by programming
TRANS_DP2_CTL [Panel Replay Tunneling Enable].
v2:
- Enable pr bw optimization along with panel replay enable. [Jani]
v3:
- Write TRANS_DP2_CTL once for both bw optimization and panel replay
enable. [Jani]
v4:
- Read DPCD once in init() and store in panel_replay_caps. [Jouni]
v5:
- Avoid reading DPCD for edp. [Jouni]
- Use drm_dp_dpcd_read_byte() and some cosmetic changes. [Jani]
v6:
- Extend the corresponding interface defined in drm_dp_tunnel.c
to query the Panel Replay optimization capability. [Imre]
v7:
- Clear TRANS_DP2_PR_TUNNELING_ENABLE if pr bw optimization
is not allowed. [Jouni]
- Move intel_dp_is_edp() check. [Jouni]
Bspec: 68920
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260330133620.3750559-4-animesh.manna@intel.com
This far using crtc_state->pipe_src as borders for Selective Update area
haven't caused visible problems as drm_rect_width(crtc_state->pipe_src) ==
crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay and
drm_rect_height(crtc_state->pipe_src) ==
crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay when pipe scaling is not
used. On the other hand using pipe scaling is forcing full frame updates and all the
Selective Update area calculations are skipped. Now this improper usage of
crtc_state->pipe_src is causing following warnings:
<4> [7771.978166] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(su_lines % vdsc_cfg->slice_height)
after WARN_ON_ONCE was added by commit:
"drm/i915/dsc: Add helper for writing DSC Selective Update ET parameters"
These warnings are seen when DSC and pipe scaling are enabled
simultaneously. This is because on full frame update SU area is improperly
set as pipe_src which is not aligned with DSC slice height.
Fix these by creating local rectangle using
crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay and
crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay. Use this local rectangle as
borders for SU area.
Fixes: d6774b8c3c ("drm/i915: Ensure damage clip area is within pipe area")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.0+
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260327114553.195285-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
intel_de_read64_2x32_volatile() is a complex beast because
it needs to deal with volatile register values. For simpler
cases we can simply do a pair normal intel_de_read()s.
My main reason for hating overuse of intel_de_read64_2x32_volatile()
is that it makes register tracepoints confusing. It always
does three accesses in the somewhat weird udw,ldw,udw order,
confusing the reader of the trace. Much more clear if we just
observe the two reads in the natural little endian order.
We also have no non-volatile use case where the LDW and UDW
are stored in non-consecutive registers, so we can just pass
along a single register offset.
v2: Put the function arguments on one line (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260331154259.24600-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
The intel_mchbar_read*() functions should only be used for
accessing MCHBAR registers. Warn if someone tries to use
them for other registers.
I suppose we could even have a dedicated type for MCHBAR
registers. But that is true for many other special register
types as well, and so far we haven't bothered adding any
special types apart from i915_mcr_reg_t.
v2: Print the register offset (Jani)
Mention i915_mcr_reg_t (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260331154259.24600-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
MCHBAR registers are a bit special in that:
- we access them through the mirror
- the mirror is read only on HSW+
- the mirror requires the actual MCHBAR to be enabled in device 0:0.0
- the mirror is gone on MTL+
So I'd prefer to treat MCHBAR registers as a bit special in
the code as well, and do all accesses to them via dedicated
functions. Prodive such functions in the form of
intel_mchbar_read*().
v2: Put the function arguments on one line
No intel_uncore_read64() on xe, use intel_uncore_read64_2x32()
Name the new function intel_mchbar_read64_2x32() as well
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260331154259.24600-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Implement the POST_LT_ADJ_REQ sequence, which should be used
to further fine tune the link if TPS4 is not supported.
The POST_LT_ADJ_REQ sequence will be performed after
the normal link training has succeeded.
Only the final hop between the last LTTPR and DPRX will
perform the POST_LT_ADJ_REQ adjustment. The earlier hops
will use TPS4 instead since it's mandatory for LTTPRs.
The sequence will terminate when the sink clears the
"in progress" flag, the vswing/pre-emphasis values have
changed six times, or the vswing/pre-emphasis values have
remained unchanged for 200 ms.
Tested-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260330202629.28616-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
