This combines the ad2s1210_update_frequency_control_word() and
ad2s1210_soft_reset() functions into a single function since they
both have to be called together. (The software reset does not reset
any configuration registers, it only updates the excitation output
and resets the tracking loop.)
Also clean up a few things while touching this:
- move AD2S1210_DEF_EXCIT macro with similar macros
- remove unnecessary dev_err() calls
Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230929-ad2s1210-mainline-v3-15-fa4364281745@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
- Remove "adi," prefix from gpio names.
- Sample gpio is now expected to be active low.
- Convert A0 and A1 gpios to "mode-gpios" gpio array.
- Convert RES0 and RES1 gpios to "resolution-gpios" gpio array.
- Remove extraneous lookup tables.
- Remove unused mode field from state struct.
- Swap argument order of ad2s1210_set_mode() while we are touching this.
Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230929-ad2s1210-mainline-v3-13-fa4364281745@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This removes the config register sysfs attribute.
Writing to the config register directly can be dangerous and userspace
should not need to have to know the register layout. This register
can still be accessed though debugfs if needed.
We can add new attributes to set specific flags in the config register
in the future if needed (e.g. `enable_hysterisis` and
`phase_lock_range`).
Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230929-ad2s1210-mainline-v3-12-fa4364281745@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This makes use of the regmap API to read and write the configuration
registers. This simplifies code quite a bit and makes it safer
(previously, it was easy to write a bad value to the config registers
which causes the chip to lock up and need to be reset).
This chip has multiple modes of operation. In normal mode, we do not use
regmap since there is no addressing - data is just bitshifted out during
the SPI read. In config mode, we use regmap since it requires writing
the address (with read/write flag) before reading and writing.
We don't use the lock provided by the regmap because we need to also
synchronize with the normal mode SPI reads and with the various GPIOs.
There is also a quirk when reading registers (other than the fault
register). If the address/data bit is set in the value read, then it
indicates there is a configuration parity error and the data is not
valid. Previously, this was checked in a few places, but not
consistently. Now, we always check it in the regmap read function.
Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230929-ad2s1210-mainline-v3-10-fa4364281745@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This removes the fclkin sysfs attribute and replaces it with getting
the CLKIN clock rate using the clk subsystem (i.e. from the devicetree).
CLKIN comes from an external oscillator that is connected directly to
the AD2S1210 chip, so users of the sysfs attributes should not need to
be concerned with this.
The fclkin field (the datasheet name) is renamed to clkin_hz to be more
obvious that it is a frequency in Hz.
Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230929-ad2s1210-mainline-v3-9-fa4364281745@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This removes the special handling for resolutions lower than 16 bits.
This will allow us to use a fixed scale independent of the resolution.
A new sample field is added to store the raw data instead of reusing
the config mode rx buffer so that we don't have to do a cast or worry
about unaligned access.
Also, for the record, according to the datasheet, the logic for the
special handling based on hysteresis that was removed was incorrect.
Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230929-ad2s1210-mainline-v3-7-fa4364281745@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The deta angle and deta velocity channels were added in parallel with
color temperature and chromacity so this merge had to assign a
consistent order. I put the color related ones second.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-50-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-49-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-48-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-47-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-46-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-45-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-44-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-43-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-42-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-41-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-40-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-39-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-38-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-37-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-36-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-35-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-34-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-33-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-32-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-31-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
