Use the new object read/write APIs instead of mapping APIs.
On compress side, zpool_obj_write() is more concise and provides exactly
what zswap needs to write the compressed object to the zpool, instead of
map->copy->unmap.
On the decompress side, zpool_obj_read_begin() is sleepable, which
allows avoiding the memcpy() for zsmalloc and slightly simplifying the
code by:
- Avoiding checking if the zpool driver is sleepable, reducing special
cases and shrinking the huge comment.
- Having a single zpool_obj_read_end() call rather than multiple
conditional zpool_unmap_handle() calls.
The !virt_addr_valid() case can be removed in the future if the crypto API
supports kmap addresses or by using kmap_to_page(), completely eliminating
the memcpy() path in zswap_decompress(). This a step toward that. In
that spirit, opportunistically make the comment more specific about the
kmap case instead of generic non-linear addresses. This is the only case
that needs to be handled in practice, and the generic comment makes it
seem like a bigger problem that it actually is.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250305061134.4105762-3-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Cc: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Decide whether to allow or reject by default on core and opertions layer
handled filters evaluation stages. It is decided as the opposite of the
last installed filter's behavior. If there is no filter at all, allow by
default. If there is any operations layer handled filters, core layer's
filtering stage sets allowing as the default behavior regardless of the
last filter of core layer-handling ones, since the last filter of core
layer handled filters in the case is not really the last filter of the
entire filtering stage.
Also, make the core layer's DAMOS filters handling stage uses the newly
set behavior field.
[sj@kernel.org: setup damos->{core,ops}_filters_default_reject for initial start]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250315222610.35245-1-sj@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250304211913.53574-8-sj@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Current default allow/reject behavior of filters handling stage has made
before introduction of the allow behavior. For allow-filters usage, it is
confusing and inefficient.
It is more intuitive to decide the default filtering stage allow/reject
behavior as opposite to the last filter's behavior. The decision should
be made separately for core and operations layers' filtering stages, since
last core layer-handled filter is not really a last filter if there are
operations layer handling filters.
Keeping separate decisions for the two categories can make the logic
simpler. Add fields for storing the two decisions.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250304211913.53574-7-sj@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
DAMON physical address space operation set implementation (paddr) started
handling both damos->filters and damos->ops_filters to avoid breakage
during the change for the ->ops_filters setup. Now the change is done, so
paddr's support of ->filters is only a waste that can safely be dropped.
Remove it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250304211913.53574-6-sj@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
damos->ops_filters has introduced to be used for all operations layer
handled filters. But DAMON kernel API callers can put any type of DAMOS
filters to any of damos->filters and damos->ops_filters. DAMON user-space
ABI users have no way to use ->ops_filters at all. Update
damos_add_filter(), which should be used by API callers to install DAMOS
filters, to add filters to ->filters and ->ops_filters depending on their
handling layer. The change forces both API callers and ABI users to use
proper lists since ABI users use the API internally.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250304211913.53574-5-sj@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
DAMON kernel API callers should use damon_commit_ctx() to install DAMON
parameters including DAMOS filters. But damos_commit_ops_filters(), which
is called by damon_commit_ctx() for filters installing, is not handling
damos->ops_filters. Hence, no DAMON kernel API caller can use
damos->ops_filters. Do the committing of the ops_filters to make it
usable.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250304211913.53574-4-sj@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
DAMON keeps all DAMOS filters in damos->filters. Upcoming changes will
make it to use damos->ops_filters for all operations layer handled DAMOS
filters, though. DAMON physical address space operations set
implementation (paddr) is not ready for the changes, since it handles only
damos->filters. To avoid any breakage during the upcoming changes, make
paddr to handle both lists. After the change is made, ->filters support
on paddr can be safely removed.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250304211913.53574-3-sj@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm/damon: make allow filters after reject filters useful and
intuitive".
DAMOS filters do allow or reject elements of memory for given DAMOS scheme
only if those match the filter criterias. For elements that don't match
any DAMOS filter, 'allowing' is the default behavior. This makes
allow-filters that don't have any reject-filter after them meaningless
sources of overhead. The decision was made to keep the behavior
consistent with that before the introduction of allow-filters. This,
however, makes usage of DAMOS filters confusing and inefficient. It is
more intuitive and still consistent behavior to reject by default unless
there is no filter at all or the last filter is a reject filter. Update
the filtering logic in the way and update documents to clarify the
behavior.
Note that this is changing the old behavior. But the old behavior for the
problematic filter combination was definitely confusing, inefficient and
anyway useless. Also, the behavior has relatively recently introduced.
It is difficult to anticipate any user that depends on the behavior.
Hence this is not a user-breaking behavior change but an obvious
improvement.
This patch (of 9):
DAMOS filters can be categorized into two groups depending on which layer
they are handled, namely core layer and ops layer. The groups are
important because the filtering behavior depends on evaluation sequence of
filters, and core layer-handled filters are evaluated before operations
layer-handled ones.
The behavior is clearly documented, but the implementation is bit
inefficient and complicated. All filters are maintained in a single list
(damos->filters) in mix. Filters evaluation logics in core layer and
operations layer iterates all the filters on the list, while skipping
filters that should be not handled by the layer of the logic. It is
inefficient. Making future extensions having differentiations for filters
of different handling layers will also be complicated.
Add a new list that will be used for having all operations layer-handled
DAMOS filters to DAMOS scheme data structure. Also add the support of its
initialization and basic traversal functions.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250304211913.53574-1-sj@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250304211913.53574-2-sj@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In the commit dcc25ae76e ("writeback: move global_dirty_limit into
wb_domain") of the cgroup writeback backpressure propagation patchset,
Tejun made some adaptations to trace_balance_dirty_pages() for cgroup
writeback. However, this adaptation was incomplete and Tejun missed
further adaptation in the subsequent patches.
In the cgroup writeback scenario, if sdtc in balance_dirty_pages() is
assigned to mdtc, then upon entering trace_balance_dirty_pages(),
__entry->limit should be assigned based on the dirty_limit of the
corresponding memcg's wb_domain, rather than global_wb_domain.
To address this issue and simplify the implementation, introduce a 'limit'
field in struct dirty_throttle_control to store the hard_limit value
computed in wb_position_ratio() by calling hard_dirty_limit(). This field
will then be used in trace_balance_dirty_pages() to assign the value to
__entry->limit.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250304110318.159567-4-yizhou.tang@shopee.com
Fixes: dcc25ae76e ("writeback: move global_dirty_limit into wb_domain")
Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@shopee.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcow (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "Fix calculations in trace_balance_dirty_pages() for cgwb", v2.
In my experiment, I found that the output of trace_balance_dirty_pages()
in the cgroup writeback scenario was strange because
trace_balance_dirty_pages() always uses global_wb_domain.dirty_limit for
related calculations instead of the dirty_limit of the corresponding
memcg's wb_domain.
The basic idea of the fix is to store the hard dirty limit value computed
in wb_position_ratio() into struct dirty_throttle_control and use it for
calculations in trace_balance_dirty_pages().
This patch (of 3):
Currently, trace_balance_dirty_pages() already has 12 parameters. In the
patch #3, I initially attempted to introduce an additional parameter.
However, in include/linux/trace_events.h, bpf_trace_run12() only supports
up to 12 parameters and bpf_trace_run13() does not exist.
To reduce the number of parameters in trace_balance_dirty_pages(), we can
make it accept a pointer to struct dirty_throttle_control as a parameter.
To achieve this, we need to move the definition of struct
dirty_throttle_control from mm/page-writeback.c to
include/linux/writeback.h.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250304110318.159567-1-yizhou.tang@shopee.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250304110318.159567-2-yizhou.tang@shopee.com
Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@shopee.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcow (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@shopee.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "Add a command line option that enables control of how many
threads should be used to allocate huge pages", v2.
Allocating huge pages can take a very long time on servers with terabytes
of memory even when they are allocated at boot time where the allocation
happens in parallel.
Before this series, the kernel used a hard coded value of 2 threads per
NUMA node for these allocations. This value might have been good enough
in the past but it is not sufficient to fully utilize newer systems.
This series changes the default so the kernel uses 25% of the available
hardware threads for these allocations. In addition, we allow the user
that wish to micro-optimize the allocation time to override this value via
a new kernel parameter.
We tested this on 2 generations of Xeon CPUs and the results show a big
improvement of the overall allocation time.
+-----------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| threads | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 128 |
+-----------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
| skylake 144 cpus | 44s | 22s | 16s | 19s | 20s |
| cascade lake 192 cpus | 39s | 20s | 11s | 10s | 9s |
+-----------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
On skylake, we see an improvment of 2.75x when using 32 threads, on
cascade lake we can get even better at 4.3x when we use 128 threads.
This speedup is quite significant and users of large machines like these
should have the option to make the machines boot as fast as possible.
This patch (of 3):
Before this patch, the kernel currently used a hard coded value of 2
threads per NUMA node for these allocations.
This patch changes this policy and the kernel now uses 25% of the
available hardware threads for the allocations.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250227-hugepage-parameter-v2-0-7db8c6dc0453@cyberus-technology.de
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250227-hugepage-parameter-v2-1-7db8c6dc0453@cyberus-technology.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Prescher <thomas.prescher@cyberus-technology.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
There's lots of text here but it's a little hard to follow, this is an
attempt to break it up and align its structure more closely with the code.
Reword the top-level function comment to just explain what question the
function answers from the point of view of the caller.
Break up the internal logic into different sections that can have their
own commentary describing why that part of the rationale is present.
Note the page_group_by_mobility_disabled logic is not explained in the
commentary, that is outside the scope of this patch...
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228-clarify-steal-v4-2-cb2ef1a4e610@google.com
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm/page_alloc: Some clarifications for migratetype
fallback", v4.
A couple of patches to try and make the code easier to follow.
This patch (of 2):
This code is rather confusing because:
1. "Steal" is sometimes used to refer to the general concept of
allocating from a from a block of a fallback migratetype
(steal_suitable_fallback()) but sometimes it refers specifically to
converting a whole block's migratetype (can_steal_fallback()).
2. can_steal_fallback() sounds as though it's answering the question "am
I functionally permitted to allocate from that other type" but in
fact it is encoding a heuristic preference.
3. The same piece of data has different names in different places:
can_steal vs whole_block. This reinforces point 2 because it looks
like the different names reflect a shift in intent from "am I
allowed to steal" to "do I want to steal", but no such shift exists.
Fix 1. by avoiding the term "steal" in ambiguous contexts. Start using
the term "claim" to refer to the special case of stealing the entire
block.
Fix 2. by using "should" instead of "can", and also rename its
parameters and add some commentary to make it more explicit what they
mean.
Fix 3. by adopting the new "claim" terminology universally for this
set of variables.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228-clarify-steal-v4-0-cb2ef1a4e610@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228-clarify-steal-v4-1-cb2ef1a4e610@google.com
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Commit 49147beb0c ("x86/xen: allow nesting of same lazy mode") was added
as a solution for a core-mm code change where
arch_[enter|leave]_lazy_mmu_mode() started to be called in a nested
manner; see commit bcc6cc8325 ("mm: add default definition of
set_ptes()").
However, now that we have fixed the API to avoid nesting, we no longer
need this capability in the x86 implementation.
Additionally, from code review, I don't believe the fix was ever robust in
the case of preemption occurring while in the nested lazy mode. The
implementation usually deals with preemption by calling
arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode() from xen_start_context_switch() for the
outgoing task if we are in the lazy mmu mode. Then in
xen_end_context_switch(), it restarts the lazy mode by calling
arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode() for an incoming task that was in the lazy mode
when it was switched out. But arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode() will only unwind
a single level of nesting. If we are in the double nest, then it's not
fully unwound and per-cpu variables are left in a bad state.
So the correct solution is to remove the possibility of nesting from the
higher level (which has now been done) and remove this x86-specific
solution.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250303141542.3371656-6-ryan.roberts@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Cc: Borislav Betkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juegren Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcow (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleinxer <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Since commit 38e0edb15b ("mm/apply_to_range: call pte function with lazy
updates") it's been possible for arch_[enter|leave]_lazy_mmu_mode() to be
called without holding a page table lock (for the kernel mappings case),
and therefore it is possible that preemption may occur while in the lazy
mmu mode. The Sparc lazy mmu implementation is not robust to preemption
since it stores the lazy mode state in a per-cpu structure and does not
attempt to manage that state on task switch.
Powerpc had the same issue and fixed it by explicitly disabling preemption
in arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode() and re-enabling in
arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(). See commit b9ef323ea1 ("powerpc/64s:
Disable preemption in hash lazy mmu mode").
Given Sparc's lazy mmu mode is based on powerpc's, let's fix it in the
same way here.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250303141542.3371656-4-ryan.roberts@arm.com
Fixes: 38e0edb15b ("mm/apply_to_range: call pte function with lazy updates")
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Borislav Betkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juegren Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcow (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleinxer <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "Fix lazy mmu mode", v2.
I'm planning to implement lazy mmu mode for arm64 to optimize vmalloc. As
part of that, I will extend lazy mmu mode to cover kernel mappings in
vmalloc table walkers. While lazy mmu mode is already used for kernel
mappings in a few places, this will extend it's use significantly.
Having reviewed the existing lazy mmu implementations in powerpc, sparc
and x86, it looks like there are a bunch of bugs, some of which may be
more likely to trigger once I extend the use of lazy mmu. So this series
attempts to clarify the requirements and fix all the bugs in advance of
that series. See patch #1 commit log for all the details.
This patch (of 5):
The docs, implementations and use of arch_[enter|leave]_lazy_mmu_mode() is
a bit of a mess (to put it politely). There are a number of issues
related to nesting of lazy mmu regions and confusion over whether the
task, when in a lazy mmu region, is preemptible or not. Fix all the
issues relating to the core-mm. Follow up commits will fix the
arch-specific implementations. 3 arches implement lazy mmu; powerpc,
sparc and x86.
When arch_[enter|leave]_lazy_mmu_mode() was first introduced by commit
6606c3e0da ("[PATCH] paravirt: lazy mmu mode hooks.patch"), it was
expected that lazy mmu regions would never nest and that the appropriate
page table lock(s) would be held while in the region, thus ensuring the
region is non-preemptible. Additionally lazy mmu regions were only used
during manipulation of user mappings.
Commit 38e0edb15b ("mm/apply_to_range: call pte function with lazy
updates") started invoking the lazy mmu mode in apply_to_pte_range(),
which is used for both user and kernel mappings. For kernel mappings the
region is no longer protected by any lock so there is no longer any
guarantee about non-preemptibility. Additionally, for RT configs, the
holding the PTL only implies no CPU migration, it doesn't prevent
preemption.
Commit bcc6cc8325 ("mm: add default definition of set_ptes()") added
arch_[enter|leave]_lazy_mmu_mode() to the default implementation of
set_ptes(), used by x86. So after this commit, lazy mmu regions can be
nested. Additionally commit 1a10a44dfc ("sparc64: implement the new
page table range API") and commit 9fee28baa6 ("powerpc: implement the
new page table range API") did the same for the sparc and powerpc
set_ptes() overrides.
powerpc couldn't deal with preemption so avoids it in commit b9ef323ea1
("powerpc/64s: Disable preemption in hash lazy mmu mode"), which
explicitly disables preemption for the whole region in its implementation.
x86 can support preemption (or at least it could until it tried to add
support nesting; more on this below). Sparc looks to be totally broken in
the face of preemption, as far as I can tell.
powerpc can't deal with nesting, so avoids it in commit 47b8def935
("powerpc/mm: Avoid calling arch_enter/leave_lazy_mmu() in set_ptes"),
which removes the lazy mmu calls from its implementation of set_ptes().
x86 attempted to support nesting in commit 49147beb0c ("x86/xen: allow
nesting of same lazy mode") but as far as I can tell, this breaks its
support for preemption.
In short, it's all a mess; the semantics for
arch_[enter|leave]_lazy_mmu_mode() are not clearly defined and as a result
the implementations all have different expectations, sticking plasters and
bugs.
arm64 is aiming to start using these hooks, so let's clean everything up
before adding an arm64 implementation. Update the documentation to state
that lazy mmu regions can never be nested, must not be called in interrupt
context and preemption may or may not be enabled for the duration of the
region. And fix the generic implementation of set_ptes() to avoid
nesting.
arch-specific fixes to conform to the new spec will proceed this one.
These issues were spotted by code review and I have no evidence of issues
being reported in the wild.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250303141542.3371656-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250303141542.3371656-2-ryan.roberts@arm.com
Fixes: bcc6cc8325 ("mm: add default definition of set_ptes()")
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Cc: Borislav Betkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juegren Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcow (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleinxer <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
