Fix several issues with DSC power domains that did not take DSI
transcoders into account:
- On TGL+ we need to use PW2 for DSC on pipe A, not transcoder A. There
is no longer an eDP transcoder, but there are two DSI transcoders
which may be connected to pipe A.
- On TGL+ we need to use the pipe, not transcoder, power domains for DSC
on pipes other than A. Again, there are DSI transcoders.
- On ICL we need to use PW2 for DSC also for DSI transcoders, not just
for the eDP transcoder.
Using is_pipe_dsc() also adds the warning about ICL pipe A DSC, which
does not exist.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191212134728.18432-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Avoid rc6 counter going backward in close to 0% RC6 scenarios like:
15.005477996 114,246,613 ns i915/rc6-residency/
16.005876662 667,657 ns i915/rc6-residency/
17.006131417 7,286 ns i915/rc6-residency/
18.006615031 18,446,744,073,708,914,688 ns i915/rc6-residency/
19.007158361 18,446,744,073,709,447,168 ns i915/rc6-residency/
20.007806498 0 ns i915/rc6-residency/
21.008227495 1,440,403 ns i915/rc6-residency/
There are two aspects to this fix.
First is not assuming rc6 value zero means GT is asleep since that can
also mean GPU is fully busy and we do not want to enter the estimation
path in that case.
Second is ensuring monotonicity on the estimation path itself. I suspect
what is happening is with extremely rapid park/unpark cycles we get no
updates on the real rc6 and therefore have to careful not to
unconditionally trust use last known real rc6 when creating a new
estimation.
v2:
* Simplify logic by not tracking the estimate but last reported value.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: 16ffe73c18 ("drm/i915/pmu: Use GT parked for estimating RC6 while asleep")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> # v1
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217142057.1000-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Move all of haswell_crtc_disable() into the encoder
.post_disable() hooks. Now we're left with just
calling the .disable() and .post_disable() hooks
back to back.
I chose to move the code into the .post_disable() hook instead
of the .disable() hook as most of the sequence is currently
implemented in the .post_disable() hook.
We should collapse it all down to just one hook and then the
encoders can drive the modeset sequence fully. But that may
need some further refactoring as we currently call the
ddi .post_disable() hook from mst code and we can't just
replace that with a call to the ddi .disable() hook.
Should also follow up with similar treatment for the enable
sequence but let's start here where it's easier.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191213195217.15168-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
We have a few places where we want to reset a crtc state to its
default values. Let's add a helper for that. We'll need the new
__drm_atomic_helper_crtc_state_reset() helper for this to allow
us to just reset the state itself without clobbering the
crtc->state pointer.
And while at it let's zero out the whole thing, except a few
choice member which we'll mark as "invalid". And thanks to this
we can now nuke intel_crtc_init_scalers().
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191107142417.11107-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
The GuC supports having multiple CT buffer pairs and we designed our
implementation with that in mind. However, the different channels are not
processed in parallel within the GuC, so there is very little advantage
in having multiple channels (independent locks?), compared to the
drawbacks (one channel can starve the other if messages keep being
submitted to it). Given this, it is unlikely we'll ever add a second
channel and therefore we can simplify our code by removing the
flexibility.
v2: split substructure grouping to separate patch, improve docs (Michal)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The only difference from the GuC POV between guc_communication_stop and
guc_communication_disable is that the former can be called after GuC
has been reset. Instead of having two separate paths, we can just skip
the call into GuC in the disabling path and re-use that.
Note that by using the disable() path instead of the stop() one there
are two additional changes in SW side for the stop path:
- interrupts are now disabled before disabling the CT, which is ok
because we do not want interrupts with CT disabled;
- guc_get_mmio_msg() is called in the stop case as well, which is ok
because if there are errors before the reset we do want to record
them.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Since commit e5dadff4b0 ("drm/i915: Protect request retirement with
timeline->mutex"), the request retirement can happen outside of the
struct_mutex serialised only by the timeline->mutex. We drop the
timeline->mutex on submitting the request (i915_request_add) so after
that point, it is liable to be freed. Make sure our local reference is
kept alive until we have finished attaching it to the signalers. (Note
that this erodes the argument that i915_request_add should consume the
reference, but that is a slightly larger patch!)
Fixes: e5dadff4b0 ("drm/i915: Protect request retirement with timeline->mutex")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217134729.3297818-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
At least Bay Trail (BYT) and Cherry Trail (CHT) devices can use 1 of 2
different PWM controllers for controlling the LCD's backlight brightness.
Either the one integrated into the PMIC or the one integrated into the
SoC (the 1st LPSS PWM controller).
So far in the LPSS code on BYT we have skipped registering the LPSS PWM
controller "pwm_backlight" lookup entry when a Crystal Cove PMIC is
present, assuming that in this case the PMIC PWM controller will be used.
On CHT we have been relying on only 1 of the 2 PWM controllers being
enabled in the DSDT at the same time; and always registered the lookup.
So far this has been working, but the correct way to determine which PWM
controller needs to be used is by checking a bit in the VBT table and
recently I've learned about 2 different BYT devices:
Point of View MOBII TAB-P800W
Acer Switch 10 SW5-012
Which use a Crystal Cove PMIC, yet the LCD is connected to the SoC/LPSS
PWM controller (and the VBT correctly indicates this), so here our old
heuristics fail.
This commit fixes using the wrong PWM controller on these devices by
calling pwm_get() for the right PWM controller based on the
VBT dsi.config.pwm_blc bit.
Note this is part of a series which contains 2 other patches which renames
the PWM lookup for the 1st SoC/LPSS PWM from "pwm_backlight" to
"pwm_pmic_backlight" and the PWM lookup for the Crystal Cove PMIC PWM
from "pwm_backlight" to "pwm_pmic_backlight".
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191216202906.1662893-4-hdegoede@redhat.com
At least Bay Trail (BYT) and Cherry Trail (CHT) devices can use 1 of 2
different PWM controllers for controlling the LCD's backlight brightness.
Either the one integrated into the PMIC or the one integrated into the
SoC (the 1st LPSS PWM controller).
So far in the LPSS code on BYT we have skipped registering the LPSS PWM
controller "pwm_backlight" lookup entry when a Crystal Cove PMIC is
present, assuming that in this case the PMIC PWM controller will be used.
On CHT we have been relying on only 1 of the 2 PWM controllers being
enabled in the DSDT at the same time; and always registered the lookup.
So far this has been working, but the correct way to determine which PWM
controller needs to be used is by checking a bit in the VBT table and
recently I've learned about 2 different BYT devices:
Point of View MOBII TAB-P800W
Acer Switch 10 SW5-012
Which use a Crystal Cove PMIC, yet the LCD is connected to the SoC/LPSS
PWM controller (and the VBT correctly indicates this), so here our old
heuristics fail.
Since only the i915 driver has access to the VBT, this commit renames
the "pwm_backlight" lookup entries for the Crystal Cove PMIC's PWM
controller to "pwm_pmic_backlight" so that the i915 driver can do a
pwm_get() for the right controller depending on the VBT bit, instead of
the i915 driver relying on a "pwm_backlight" lookup getting registered
which magically points to the right controller.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191216202906.1662893-3-hdegoede@redhat.com
At least Bay Trail (BYT) and Cherry Trail (CHT) devices can use 1 of 2
different PWM controllers for controlling the LCD's backlight brightness.
Either the one integrated into the PMIC or the one integrated into the
SoC (the 1st LPSS PWM controller).
So far in the LPSS code on BYT we have skipped registering the LPSS PWM
controller "pwm_backlight" lookup entry when a Crystal Cove PMIC is
present, assuming that in this case the PMIC PWM controller will be used.
On CHT we have been relying on only 1 of the 2 PWM controllers being
enabled in the DSDT at the same time; and always registered the lookup.
So far this has been working, but the correct way to determine which PWM
controller needs to be used is by checking a bit in the VBT table and
recently I've learned about 2 different BYT devices:
Point of View MOBII TAB-P800W
Acer Switch 10 SW5-012
Which use a Crystal Cove PMIC, yet the LCD is connected to the SoC/LPSS
PWM controller (and the VBT correctly indicates this), so here our old
heuristics fail.
Since only the i915 driver has access to the VBT, this commit renames
the "pwm_backlight" lookup entries for the 1st BYT/CHT LPSS PWM controller
to "pwm_soc_backlight" so that the i915 driver can do a pwm_get() for
the right controller depending on the VBT bit, instead of the i915 driver
relying on a "pwm_backlight" lookup getting registered which magically
points to the right controller.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191216202906.1662893-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
When creating a handle, it is just that, an abstract handle. The fact
that we cannot currently support a handle larger than the size of the
backing storage is an artifact of our whole-object-at-a-time handling in
get_pages() and being an implementation limitation is best handled at
that point -- similar to shmem, where we only barf when asked to
populate the whole object if larger than RAM. (Pinning the whole object
at a time is major hindrance that we are likely to have to overcome in
the near future.) In the case of the buddy allocator, the late check is
preferable as the request size may often be smaller than the required
size.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191216122603.2598155-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
According to both the old acpi_igd_opregion_spec_0.pdf and the newer
skl_opregion_rev0p5.pdf opregion specification documents, if a driver
handles hotplug events itself, it should set the opregion CHPD field to
1 to indicate this and the firmware should respond to this by no longer
sending ACPI 0x00 notification events on e.g. lid-state changes.
Specifically skl_opregion_rev0p5.pdf states thid in the documentation of
the CHPD word: "Re-enumeration trigger logic in System BIOS MUST be
disabled for all the Operating Systems supporting Hot-Plug
(e.g., Windows* Longhorn and above)." Note the MUST in there.
We ignore these notifications, so this should not be a problem but many
recent DSTDs seem to all have the same copy-pasted bug in the GNOT() AML
function which is used to send these notifications. Windows likely does not
hit this bug as it presumably correcty sets CHPD to 1.
Here is an example of the broken GNOT() method:
Method (GNOT, 2, NotSerialized)
{
...
CEVT = Arg0
CSTS = 0x03
If (((CHPD == Zero) && (Arg1 == Zero)))
{
If (((OSYS > 0x07D0) || (OSYS < 0x07D6)))
{
Notify (PCI0, Arg1)
}
Else
{
Notify (GFX0, Arg1)
}
}
...
Notice that the condition for the If is always true I believe that the
|| like needs to be an &&, but there is nothing we can do about this and
in my own DSDT archive 55 of the 93 DSDTs have this issue.
When the if is true the notification gets send to the PCI root instead
of only to the GFX0 device. This causes Linux to re-enumerate PCI devices
whenever the LID opens / closes, leading to unexpected messages in dmesg:
Suspend through lid close:
[ 313.598199] intel_atomisp2_pm 0000:00:03.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3
[ 313.664453] intel_atomisp2_pm 0000:00:03.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3
[ 313.737982] pci_bus 0000:01: Allocating resources
[ 313.738036] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0: bridge window [io 0x1000-0x0fff] to [bus 01] add_size 1000
[ 313.738051] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0: bridge window [mem 0x00100000-0x000fffff 64bit pref] to [bus 01] add_size 200000 add_align 100000
[ 313.738111] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0: BAR 15: assigned [mem 0x91000000-0x911fffff 64bit pref]
[ 313.738128] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0: BAR 13: assigned [io 0x1000-0x1fff]
Resume:
[ 813.623894] pci 0000:00:03.0: [8086:22b8] type 00 class 0x048000
[ 813.623955] pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x003fffff]
[ 813.630477] pci 0000:00:03.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x91c00000-0x91ffffff]
[ 854.579101] intel_atomisp2_pm 0000:00:03.0: Refused to change power state, currently in D3
And more importantly this re-enumeration races with suspend/resume causing
enumeration to not be complete when assert_isp_power_gated() from
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c runs. This causes
the !pci_dev_present(isp_ids) check in assert_isp_power_gated() to fail
making the condition for the WARN true, leading to:
[ 813.327886] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 813.327898] ISP not power gated
[ 813.328028] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2317 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c:4870 intel_display_print_error_state+0x2b98/0x3a80 [i915]
...
[ 813.328599] ---[ end trace f01e81b599596774 ]---
This commit fixes the unwanted ACPI notification on the PCI root device
by setting CHPD to 1, so that the broken if condition in the AML never
gets checked as notifications of type 0x00 are disabled altogether.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191212204828.191288-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Just like in commit 523e0cc89b ("drm/i915/tgl: allow DVI/HDMI on port
A"), the port checks when reading the VBT can easily not match what the
platform really exposes. However here we only have some additional debug
messages that are not adding much value: in the previous debug message
we already print everything we know about the VBT.
Instead of keep fixing the possible port assignments according to the
platform, just nuke the additional messages.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191206190552.8818-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
