In addition to the normal 64-bit instruction encoding, eBPF also has
a single instruction that uses a second 64-bit bits for a second
immediate value. Instead of only documenting this format deep down
in the document mention it in the instruction encoding section.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220131183638.3934982-5-hch@lst.de
Andrii Nakryiko says:
====================
Clean up remaining missed uses of deprecated libbpf APIs across samples/bpf,
selftests/bpf, libbpf, and bpftool.
Also fix uninit variable warning in bpftool.
====================
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Switch to using new bpf_xdp_*() APIs across all selftests. Take
advantage of a more straightforward and user-friendly semantics of
old_prog_fd (0 means "don't care") in few places.
This is a redo of 544356524d ("selftests/bpf: switch to new libbpf XDP
APIs"), which was previously reverted to minimize conflicts during bpf
and bpf-next tree merge.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220202225916.3313522-6-andrii@kernel.org
Delyan Kratunov says:
====================
Fairly straight-forward mechanical transformation from bpf_prog_test_run
and bpf_prog_test_run_xattr to the bpf_prog_test_run_opts goodness.
I did a fair amount of drive-by CHECK/CHECK_ATTR cleanups as well, though
certainly not everything possible. Primarily, I did not want to just change
arguments to CHECK calls, though I had to do a bit more than that
in some cases (overall, -119 CHECK calls and all CHECK_ATTR calls).
v2 -> v3:
Don't introduce CHECK_OPTS, replace CHECK/CHECK_ATTR usages we need to touch
with ASSERT_* calls instead.
Don't be prescriptive about the opts var name and keep old names where that would
minimize unnecessary code churn.
Drop _xattr-specific checks in prog_run_xattr and rename accordingly.
v1 -> v2:
Split selftests/bpf changes into two commits to appease the mailing list.
====================
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Nathan Chancellor says:
====================
This series allows CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF5 to be selected with
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y by checking the pahole version.
The first four patches add CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION and
scripts/pahole-version.sh to clean up all the places that pahole's
version is transformed into a 3-digit form.
The fourth patch adds a PAHOLE_VERSION dependency to DEBUG_INFO_DWARF5
so that there are no build errors when it is selected with
DEBUG_INFO_BTF.
I build tested Fedora's aarch64 and x86_64 config with ToT clang 14.0.0
and GCC 11 with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF5 enabled with both pahole 1.21
and 1.23.
====================
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
There are a few different places where pahole's version is turned into a
three digit form with the exact same command. Move this command into
scripts/pahole-version.sh to reduce the amount of duplication across the
tree.
Create CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION so the version code can be used in Kconfig
to enable and disable configuration options based on the pahole version,
which is already done in a couple of places.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220201205624.652313-3-nathan@kernel.org
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
CO-RE in the kernel support allows bpf preload to switch to light
skeleton and remove libbpf dependency.
This reduces the size of bpf_preload_umd from 300kbyte to 19kbyte
and eventually will make "kernel skeleton" possible.
====================
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
btf_ext__{func,line}_info_rec_size functions are used in conjunction
with already-deprecated btf_ext__reloc_{func,line}_info functions. Since
struct btf_ext is opaque to the user it was necessary to expose rec_size
getters in the past.
btf_ext__reloc_{func,line}_info were deprecated in commit 8505e8709b
("libbpf: Implement generalized .BTF.ext func/line info adjustment")
as they're not compatible with support for multiple programs per
section. It was decided[0] that users of these APIs should implement their
own .btf.ext parsing to access this data, in which case the rec_size
getters are unnecessary. So deprecate them from libbpf 0.7.0 onwards.
[0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/277
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220201014610.3522985-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Jakub Sitnicki says:
====================
This is a follow-up to discussion around the idea of making dst_port in struct
bpf_sock a 16-bit field that happened in [1].
v2:
- use an anonymous field for zero padding (Alexei)
v1:
- keep dst_field offset unchanged to prevent existing BPF program breakage
(Martin)
- allow 8-bit loads from dst_port[0] and [1]
- add test coverage for the verifier and the context access converter
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87sftbobys.fsf@cloudflare.com/
====================
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add coverage to the verifier tests and tests for reading bpf_sock fields to
ensure that 32-bit, 16-bit, and 8-bit loads from dst_port field are allowed
only at intended offsets and produce expected values.
While 16-bit and 8-bit access to dst_port field is straight-forward, 32-bit
wide loads need be allowed and produce a zero-padded 16-bit value for
backward compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220130115518.213259-3-jakub@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Menglong Dong reports that the documentation for the dst_port field in
struct bpf_sock is inaccurate and confusing. From the BPF program PoV, the
field is a zero-padded 16-bit integer in network byte order. The value
appears to the BPF user as if laid out in memory as so:
offsetof(struct bpf_sock, dst_port) + 0 <port MSB>
+ 8 <port LSB>
+16 0x00
+24 0x00
32-, 16-, and 8-bit wide loads from the field are all allowed, but only if
the offset into the field is 0.
32-bit wide loads from dst_port are especially confusing. The loaded value,
after converting to host byte order with bpf_ntohl(dst_port), contains the
port number in the upper 16-bits.
Remove the confusion by splitting the field into two 16-bit fields. For
backward compatibility, allow 32-bit wide loads from offsetof(struct
bpf_sock, dst_port).
While at it, allow loads 8-bit loads at offset [0] and [1] from dst_port.
Reported-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220130115518.213259-2-jakub@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Hangbin Liu says:
====================
There are some bpf tests using hard code netns name like ns0, ns1, etc.
This kind of ns name is easily used by other tests or system. If there
is already a such netns, all the related tests will failed. So let's
use temp netns name for testing.
The first patch not only change to temp netns. But also fixed an interface
index issue. So I add fixes tag. For the later patches, I think that
should be an update instead of fixes, so the fixes tag is not added.
====================
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Use temp netns instead of hard code name for testing in case the netns
already exists.
Remove the hard code interface index when creating the veth interfaces.
Because when the system loads some virtual interface modules, e.g. tunnels.
the ifindex of 2 will be used and the cmd will fail.
As the netns has not created if checking environment failed. Trap the
clean up function after checking env.
Fixes: 8955c1a329 ("selftests/bpf/xdp_redirect_multi: Limit the tests in netns")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220125081717.1260849-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
