Patch series "ipc: IPCMNI limit check for *mni & increase that limit", v9.
The sysctl parameters msgmni, shmmni and semmni have an inherent limit of
IPC_MNI (32k). However, users may not be aware of that because they can
write a value much higher than that without getting any error or
notification. Reading the parameters back will show the newly written
values which are not real.
The real IPCMNI limit is now enforced to make sure that users won't put in
an unrealistic value. The first 2 patches enforce the limits.
There are also users out there requesting increase in the IPCMNI value.
The last 2 patches attempt to do that by using a boot kernel parameter
"ipcmni_extend" to increase the IPCMNI limit from 32k to 8M if the users
really want the extended value.
This patch (of 4):
A user can write arbitrary integer values to msgmni and shmmni sysctl
parameters without getting error, but the actual limit is really IPCMNI
(32k). This can mislead users as they think they can get a value that is
not real.
The right limits are now set for msgmni and shmmni so that the users will
become aware if they set a value outside of the acceptable range.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1536352137-12003-2-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
If a call to panic() terminates the string with a \n , the result puts the
closing brace ']---' on a newline because panic() itself adds \n too.
Now, if one goes and removes the newline chars from all panic()
invocations - and the stats right now look like this:
~300 calls with a \n
~500 calls without a \n
one is destined to a neverending game of whack-a-mole because the usual
thing to do is add a newline at the end of a string a function is supposed
to print.
Therefore, simply zap any \n at the end of the panic string to avoid
touching so many places in the kernel.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181009205019.2786-1-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "fat: timestamp updates", v5.
fat/msdos timestamps are stored on-disk with several different
granularities, some of them lower resolution than timespec64_trunc() can
provide. In addition, they are only truncated as they are written to
disk, so the timestamps in-memory for new or modified files/directories
may be different from the same timestamps after a remount, as the
now-truncated times are re-read from the on-disk format.
These patches allow finer granularity for the timestamps where possible
and add fat-specific ->update_time inode operation and fat_truncate_time
functions to truncate each timestamp correctly, giving consistent times
across remounts.
This patch (of 4):
Move the calculation of the number of seconds in the timezone offset to a
common function.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/3671ff8cff5eeedbb85ebda5e4de0728920db4f6.1538363961.git.sorenson@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Frank Sorenson <sorenson@redhat.com>
Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
fill_with_dentries() failed to propagate errors up to
reiserfs_for_each_xattr() properly. Plumb them through.
Note that reiserfs_for_each_xattr() is only used by
reiserfs_delete_xattrs() and reiserfs_chown_xattrs(). The result of
reiserfs_delete_xattrs() is discarded anyway, the only difference there is
whether a warning is printed to dmesg. The result of
reiserfs_chown_xattrs() does matter because it can block chowning of the
file to which the xattrs belong; but either way, the resulting state can
have misaligned ownership, so my patch doesn't improve things greatly.
Credit for making me look at this code goes to Al Viro, who pointed out
that the ->actor calling convention is suboptimal and should be changed.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180802163335.83312-1-jannh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Currently extent and index i are both being incremented causing an array
out of bounds read on extent[i]. Fix this by removing the extraneous
increment of extent.
Ernesto said:
: This is only triggered when deleting a file with a resource fork. I
: may be wrong because the documentation isn't clear, but I don't think
: you can create those under linux. So I guess nobody was testing them.
:
: > A disk space leak, perhaps?
:
: That's what it looks like in general. hfs_free_extents() won't do
: anything if the block count doesn't add up, and the error will be
: ignored. Now, if the block count randomly does add up, we could see
: some corruption.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#711541 ("Out of bounds read")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180831140538.31566-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Ernesto A. Fernndez <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Hin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Inserting a new record in a btree may require splitting several of its
nodes. If we hit ENOSPC halfway through, the new nodes will be left
orphaned and their records will be lost. This could mean lost inodes or
extents.
Henceforth, check the available disk space before making any changes.
This still leaves the potential problem of corruption on ENOMEM.
There is no need to reserve space before deleting a catalog record, as we
do for hfsplus. This difference is because hfs index nodes have fixed
length keys.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ab5fc8a7d5ffccfd5f27b1cf2cb4ceb6c110da74.1536269131.git.ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ernesto A. Fernández <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Creating, renaming or deleting a file may hit BUG_ON() if the first
record of both a leaf node and its parent are changed, and if this
forces the parent to be split. This bug is triggered by xfstests
generic/027, somewhat rarely; here is a more reliable reproducer:
truncate -s 50M fs.iso
mkfs.hfsplus fs.iso
mount fs.iso /mnt
i=1000
while [ $i -le 2400 ]; do
touch /mnt/$i &>/dev/null
((++i))
done
i=2400
while [ $i -ge 1000 ]; do
mv /mnt/$i /mnt/$(perl -e "print $i x61") &>/dev/null
((--i))
done
The issue is that a newly created bnode is being put twice. Reset
new_node to NULL in hfs_brec_update_parent() before reaching goto again.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5ee1db09b60373a15890f6a7c835d00e76bf601d.1535682461.git.ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ernesto A. Fernández <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Creating, renaming or deleting a file may cause catalog corruption and
data loss. This bug is randomly triggered by xfstests generic/027, but
here is a faster reproducer:
truncate -s 50M fs.iso
mkfs.hfsplus fs.iso
mount fs.iso /mnt
i=100
while [ $i -le 150 ]; do
touch /mnt/$i &>/dev/null
((++i))
done
i=100
while [ $i -le 150 ]; do
mv /mnt/$i /mnt/$(perl -e "print $i x82") &>/dev/null
((++i))
done
umount /mnt
fsck.hfsplus -n fs.iso
The bug is triggered whenever hfs_brec_update_parent() needs to split the
root node. The height of the btree is not increased, which leaves the new
node orphaned and its records lost.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/26d882184fc43043a810114258f45277752186c7.1535682461.git.ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ernesto A. Fernández <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This patch remove all following fall through warnings by
adding /* fall through */ markers.
Note that we cannot add "__attribute__ ((fallthrough));" due to it is GCC7 only
arch/arm/boot/compressed/../../../../lib/zlib_inflate/inflate.c:384:25: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
arch/arm/boot/compressed/../../../../lib/zlib_inflate/inflate.c:391:25: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
arch/arm/boot/compressed/../../../../lib/zlib_inflate/inflate.c:393:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
arch/arm/boot/compressed/../../../../lib/zlib_inflate/inflate.c:430:25: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
arch/arm/boot/compressed/../../../../lib/zlib_inflate/inflate.c:556:25: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
arch/arm/boot/compressed/../../../../lib/zlib_inflate/inflate.c:595:25: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
arch/arm/boot/compressed/../../../../lib/zlib_inflate/inflate.c:602:25: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
arch/arm/boot/compressed/../../../../lib/zlib_inflate/inflate.c:627:25: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
arch/arm/boot/compressed/../../../../lib/zlib_inflate/inflate.c:646:25: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
arch/arm/boot/compressed/../../../../lib/zlib_inflate/inflate.c:696:25: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
It is easy to see that thoses fall through are needed since in each case state->mode are set to the case value just below.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1536215920-19955-1-git-send-email-clabbe@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
For various alignments of buf, the current expression computes
4096 ok
4095 ok
8190
8189
...
4097
i.e., if the caller has already written two bytes into the page buffer,
len is 8190 rather than 4094, because PTR_ALIGN aligns up to the next
boundary. So if the printed version of the bitmap is huge, scnprintf()
ends up writing beyond the page boundary.
I don't think any current callers actually write anything before
bitmap_print_to_pagebuf, but the API seems to be designed to allow it.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: use offset_in_page(), per Andy]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: include mm.h for offset_in_page()]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180818131623.8755-7-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The static inlines in bitmap.h do not handle a compile-time constant
nbits==0 correctly (they dereference the passed src or dst pointers,
despite only 0 words being valid to access). I had the 0-day buildbot
chew on a patch [1] that would cause build failures for such cases without
complaining, suggesting that we don't have any such users currently, at
least for the 70 .config/arch combinations that was built. Should any
turn up, make sure they use the out-of-line versions, which do handle
nbits==0 correctly.
This is of course not the most efficient, but it's much less churn than
teaching all the static inlines an "if (zero_const_nbits())", and since we
don't have any current instances, this doesn't affect existing code at
all.
[1] lkml.kernel.org/r/20180815085539.27485-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180818131623.8755-3-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
