In commit 8a5a75e5e9 ("of/fdt: Make sure no-map does not remove
already reserved regions") we returned -EBUSY when trying to mark
regions as no-map when they intersect with reserved memory. The goal was
to find bad no-map reserved memory DT nodes that would unmap the kernel
text/data sections.
The problem is the reserved memory check will still trigger if the DT
has a /memreserve/ that completely subsumes the no-map memory carveouts
in the reserved memory node _and_ that region is also not part of the
memory reg property. For example in sc7180.dtsi we have the following
reserved-memory and memory node:
memory@80000000 {
/* We expect the bootloader to fill in the size */
reg = <0 0x80000000 0 0>;
};
smem_mem: memory@80900000 {
reg = <0x0 0x80900000 0x0 0x200000>;
no-map;
};
and the memreserve filled in by the bootloader is
/memreserve/ 0x80800000 0x400000;
while the /memory node is transformed into
memory@80000000 {
/* The bootloader fills in the size, and adds another region */
reg = <0 0x80000000 0 0x00800000>,
<0 0x80c00000 0 0x7f200000>;
};
The smem region is doubly reserved via /memreserve/ and by not being
part of the /memory reg property. This leads to the following warning
printed at boot.
OF: fdt: Reserved memory: failed to reserve memory for node 'memory@80900000': base 0x0000000080900000, size 2 MiB
Otherwise nothing really goes wrong because the smem region is not going
to be mapped by the kernel's direct linear mapping given that it isn't
part of the memory node. Therefore, let's only consider this to be a
problem if we're trying to mark a region as no-map and it is actually
memory that we're intending to keep out of the kernel's direct mapping
but it's already been reserved.
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Fixes: 8a5a75e5e9 ("of/fdt: Make sure no-map does not remove already reserved regions")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220107194233.2793146-1-swboyd@chromium.org
The cells_name field of of_phandle_iterator might be NULL. Use the
phandle name instead. With this change instead of:
OF: /soc/pinctrl@1000000: (null) = 3 found 2
We get:
OF: /soc/pinctrl@1000000: phandle pinctrl@1000000 needs 3, found 2
Which is a more helpful messages making DT debugging easier.
In this particular example the phandle name looks like duplicate of the
same node name. But note that the first node is the parent node
(it->parent), while the second is the phandle target (it->node). They
happen to be the same in the case that triggered this improvement. See
commit 72cb4c48a4 ("arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: Fix gpio-ranges
property").
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f6a68e0088a552ea9dfd4d8e3b5b586d92594738.1640881913.git.baruch@tkos.co.il
With 'unevaluatedProperties' support enabled, the novatek,nt36672a
binding has a new warning:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/novatek,nt36672a.example.dt.yaml: panel@0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('vddi0-supply', '#address-cells', '#size-cells' were unexpected)
Based on dts files, 'vddi0-supply' does appear to be the correct name.
Drop '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' which aren't needed.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211221125125.1194554-1-robh@kernel.org
Some overlays are tracked when they are applied. The tracked overlays
are later removed after the overlay tests are completed. The old
implementation makes assumptions about the expected values for
overlay changeset id created by the overlay apply which result
in fragile code. The new code removes the assumptions.
A symptom that exposes a problem with the tracking code is a
warning "UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/of/unittest.c:1933:36",
Kernel Version: 5.15-rc7, PPC-64, Talos II. This results from variable
"id" value of -1 in the final line of of_unittest_untrack_overlay().
Reported-by: erhard_f@mailbox.org
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220101033329.1277779-3-frowand.list@gmail.com
Unittest inconsistently interchanges overlay changeset id and
overlay id. Change variable names of overlay id to overlay
changeset id.
Do not fix variable names in the overlay tracking functions
of_unittest_overlay_tracked(), of_unittest_track_overlay(), and
of_unittest_destroy_tracked_overlays() which will be replaced in
a following commit.
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220101033329.1277779-2-frowand.list@gmail.com
Enable port inside panel bindings.
Fixes warnings generated by `make qcom-apq8064-asus-nexus7-flo.dtb` as:
arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-asus-nexus7-flo.dt.yaml: panel@0: 'port' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/jdi,lt070me05000.yaml
Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211224195354.78362-1-david@ixit.cz
With 'unevaluatedProperties' support enabled, the st,stm32-dsi binding
has a new warning:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-dsi.example.dt.yaml: dsi@5a000000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('panel-dsi@0' was unexpected)
The documented child node name is 'panel', so update the example.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211221125145.1195234-1-robh@kernel.org
The PL330 was commented out because its binding wasn't converted to a
schema. With the binding converted, the example now needs several updates.
However, while it's possible that the PL330 has a 'cci-control-port', there
aren't any platforms upstream which do. So rather than allowing
'cci-control-port' in the PL330 binding, let's just drop the example.
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
The struct device variable "dev_bogus" was triggering this warning
on a PowerPC build:
drivers/of/unittest.c: In function 'of_unittest_dma_ranges_one.constprop':
[...] >> The frame size of 1424 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
[-Wframe-larger-than=]
This variable is now dynamically allocated.
Fixes: e0d072782c ("dma-mapping: introduce DMA range map, supplanting dma_pfn_offset")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210184636.7273-2-jim2101024@gmail.com
With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, there's a number of
warnings from the Designware PCIe based bindings:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@1ffc000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'device_type', 'bus-range', 'ranges', '#interrupt-cells', 'interrupt-map-mask', 'interrupt-map' were unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@1ffc000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('clock-names' was unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon,kirin-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@f4000000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('bus-range', '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'device_type', 'ranges', 'num-lanes', '#interrupt-cells', 'interrupts', 'interrupt-names', 'interrupt-map-mask', 'interrupt-map', 'clocks', 'clock-names' were unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon,kirin-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@f4000000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('clock-names' was unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon,kirin-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@f5000000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('bus-range', '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'device_type', 'phys', 'ranges', 'num-lanes', '#interrupt-cells', 'interrupts', 'interrupt-names', 'interrupt-map-mask', 'interrupt-map', 'reset-gpios', 'pcie@0,0' were unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon,kirin-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@f5000000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('phys', 'hisilicon,clken-gpios' were unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/intel-gw-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@d0e00000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('device_type', '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'linux,pci-domain', 'bus-range', '#interrupt-cells', 'interrupt-map-mask', 'interrupt-map' were unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/intel-gw-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@d0e00000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('resets', 'phys', 'phy-names', 'reset-assert-ms' were unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@fe280000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('clock-names', 'msi-map', 'phys', 'phy-names', 'power-domains', 'resets', 'reset-names' were unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@15700000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('#address-cells', '#size-cells', '#interrupt-cells', 'device_type', 'bus-range', 'ranges', 'interrupt-map-mask', 'interrupt-map' were unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@15700000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('clock-names', 'phys', 'vdd10-supply', 'vdd18-supply' were unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/sifive,fu740-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@e00000000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('#address-cells', '#size-cells', '#interrupt-cells', 'device_type', 'dma-coherent', 'bus-range', 'ranges', 'interrupts', 'interrupt-parent', 'interrupt-map-mask', 'interrupt-map', 'clock-names', 'clocks' were unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/sifive,fu740-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@e00000000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('dma-coherent', 'clock-names', 'resets', 'pwren-gpios' were unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/socionext,uniphier-pcie-ep.example.dt.yaml: pcie-ep@66000000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('clock-names', 'clocks', 'reset-names', 'resets', 'phy-names', 'phys' were unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/toshiba,visconti-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@28400000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('clock-names' was unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/toshiba,visconti-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@28400000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('device_type', 'bus-range', 'num-viewport', '#address-cells', '#size-cells', '#interrupt-cells', 'ranges', 'interrupt-names', 'interrupt-map-mask', 'interrupt-map', 'max-link-speed' were unexpected)
The main problem is that snps,dw-pcie.yaml and snps,dw-pcie-ep.yaml
shouldn't set 'unevaluatedProperties: false'. Otherwise, bindings that
reference them cannot add additional properties. With that addressed,
there's a handful of other undocumented properties to add.
Cc: Xiaowei Song <songxiaowei@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Binghui Wang <wangbinghui@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Cc: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211206194426.2470080-1-robh@kernel.org
With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, there's several
warnings due to undocumented properties:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek,mt7621-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@1e140000: pcie@0,0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('phy-names' was unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek,mt7621-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@1e140000: pcie@1,0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('phy-names' was unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek,mt7621-pcie.example.dt.yaml: pcie@1e140000: pcie@2,0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('phy-names' was unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie-gen3.example.dt.yaml: pcie@11230000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('phy-names' was unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/microchip,pcie-host.example.dt.yaml: pcie@2030000000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('interrupt-controller' was unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/ti,am65-pci-ep.example.dt.yaml: pcie-ep@5500000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('num-ib-windows', 'num-ob-windows' were unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/ti,am65-pci-host.example.dt.yaml: pcie@5500000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('num-viewport', 'interrupts' were unexpected)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/ti,j721e-pci-host.example.dt.yaml: pcie@2900000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('dma-coherent' was unexpected)
Add the necessary property definitions or remove the properties from the
examples to fix these warnings.
Cc: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
Cc: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>
Cc: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>
Cc: Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211206194406.2469361-1-robh@kernel.org
With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, the TI GPMC example
has a warning:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ti,gpmc-onenand.example.dt.yaml: memory-controller@6e000000: onenand@0,0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('compatible', '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'partition@0', 'partition@100000' were unexpected)
The child node definition for GPMC is not a complete binding, so specifying
'unevaluatedProperties: false' for it is not correct and should be
dropped.
Fixup the unnecessary 'allOf' while we're here.
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211206174215.2297796-1-robh@kernel.org
With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, the ti,rti-wdt example
has the following warning:
/home/rob/proj/git/linux-dt/.build-arm64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/ti,rti-wdt.example.dt.yaml: watchdog@2200000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('assigned-clock-parents' was unexpected)
The problem is the schema has a typo in 'assigned-clocks-parents'. As
it is not required to list assigned clocks in bindings, just drop the
property definitions to fix this.
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211206174028.2294330-1-robh@kernel.org
