[BUG]
If we failed to compress the range, or cannot reserve a large enough
data extent (e.g. too fragmented free space), we will fall back to
submit_uncompressed_range().
But inside submit_uncompressed_range(), run_delalloc_cow() can also fail
due to -ENOSPC or any other error.
In that case there are 3 bugs in the error handling:
1) Double freeing for the same ordered extent
This can lead to crash due to ordered extent double accounting
2) Start/end writeback without updating the subpage writeback bitmap
3) Unlock the folio without clear the subpage lock bitmap
Both bugs 2) and 3) will crash the kernel if the btrfs block size is
smaller than folio size, as the next time the folio gets writeback/lock
updates, subpage will find the bitmap already have the range set,
triggering an ASSERT().
[CAUSE]
Bug 1) happens in the following call chain:
submit_uncompressed_range()
|- run_delalloc_cow()
| |- cow_file_range()
| |- btrfs_reserve_extent()
| Failed with -ENOSPC or whatever error
|
|- btrfs_clean_up_ordered_extents()
| |- btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished()
| Which cleans all the ordered extents in the async_extent range.
|
|- btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished()
Which cleans the folio range.
The finished ordered extents may not be immediately removed from the
ordered io tree, as they are removed inside a work queue.
So the second btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() may find the finished but
not-yet-removed ordered extents, and double free them.
Furthermore, the second btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() is not subpage
compatible, as it uses fixed folio_pos() with PAGE_SIZE, which can cover
other ordered extents.
Bugs 2) and 3) are more straightforward, btrfs just calls folio_unlock(),
folio_start_writeback() and folio_end_writeback(), other than the helpers
which handle subpage cases.
[FIX]
For bug 1) since the first btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() call is
handling the whole range, we should not do the second
btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() call.
And for the first btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents(), we no longer need to
pass the @locked_page parameter, as we are already in the async extent
context, thus will never rely on the error handling inside
btrfs_run_delalloc_range().
So just let the btrfs_clean_up_ordered_extents() handle every folio
equally.
For bug 2) we should not even call
folio_start_writeback()/folio_end_writeback() anymore.
As the error handling protocol, cow_file_range() should clear
dirty flag and start/finish the writeback for the whole range passed in.
For bug 3) just change the folio_unlock() to btrfs_folio_end_lock()
helper.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
If submit_one_sector() failed inside extent_writepage_io() for sector
size < page size cases (e.g. 4K sector size and 64K page size), then
we can hit double ordered extent accounting error.
This should be very rare, as submit_one_sector() only fails when we
failed to grab the extent map, and such extent map should exist inside
the memory and has been pinned.
[CAUSE]
For example we have the following folio layout:
0 4K 32K 48K 60K 64K
|//| |//////| |///|
Where |///| is the dirty range we need to writeback. The 3 different
dirty ranges are submitted for regular COW.
Now we hit the following sequence:
- submit_one_sector() returned 0 for [0, 4K)
- submit_one_sector() returned 0 for [32K, 48K)
- submit_one_sector() returned error for [60K, 64K)
- btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() called for the whole folio
This will mark the following ranges as finished:
* [0, 4K)
* [32K, 48K)
Both ranges have their IO already submitted, this cleanup will
lead to double accounting.
* [60K, 64K)
That's the correct cleanup.
The only good news is, this error is only theoretical, as the target
extent map is always pinned, thus we should directly grab it from
memory, other than reading it from the disk.
[FIX]
Instead of calling btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() for the whole folio
range, which can touch ranges we should not touch, instead
move the error handling inside extent_writepage_io().
So that we can cleanup exact sectors that ought to be submitted but failed.
This provides much more accurate cleanup, avoiding the double accounting.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
When running btrfs with block size (4K) smaller than page size (64K,
aarch64), there is a very high chance to crash the kernel at
generic/750, with the following messages:
(before the call traces, there are 3 extra debug messages added)
BTRFS warning (device dm-3): read-write for sector size 4096 with page size 65536 is experimental
BTRFS info (device dm-3): checking UUID tree
hrtimer: interrupt took 5451385 ns
BTRFS error (device dm-3): cow_file_range failed, root=4957 inode=257 start=1605632 len=69632: -28
BTRFS error (device dm-3): run_delalloc_nocow failed, root=4957 inode=257 start=1605632 len=69632: -28
BTRFS error (device dm-3): failed to run delalloc range, root=4957 ino=257 folio=1572864 submit_bitmap=8-15 start=1605632 len=69632: -28
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3020984 at ordered-data.c:360 can_finish_ordered_extent+0x370/0x3b8 [btrfs]
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 3020984 Comm: kworker/u24:1 Tainted: G OE 6.13.0-rc1-custom+ #89
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
pc : can_finish_ordered_extent+0x370/0x3b8 [btrfs]
lr : can_finish_ordered_extent+0x1ec/0x3b8 [btrfs]
Call trace:
can_finish_ordered_extent+0x370/0x3b8 [btrfs] (P)
can_finish_ordered_extent+0x1ec/0x3b8 [btrfs] (L)
btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished+0x130/0x2b8 [btrfs]
extent_writepage+0x10c/0x3b8 [btrfs]
extent_write_cache_pages+0x21c/0x4e8 [btrfs]
btrfs_writepages+0x94/0x160 [btrfs]
do_writepages+0x74/0x190
filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x74/0xa0
start_delalloc_inodes+0x17c/0x3b0 [btrfs]
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x17c/0x288 [btrfs]
shrink_delalloc+0x11c/0x280 [btrfs]
flush_space+0x288/0x328 [btrfs]
btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x180/0x228 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x228/0x680
worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360
kthread+0x100/0x118
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
BTRFS critical (device dm-3): bad ordered extent accounting, root=4957 ino=257 OE offset=1605632 OE len=16384 to_dec=16384 left=0
BTRFS critical (device dm-3): bad ordered extent accounting, root=4957 ino=257 OE offset=1622016 OE len=12288 to_dec=12288 left=0
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000008
BTRFS critical (device dm-3): bad ordered extent accounting, root=4957 ino=257 OE offset=1634304 OE len=8192 to_dec=4096 left=0
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 3286940 Comm: kworker/u24:3 Tainted: G W OE 6.13.0-rc1-custom+ #89
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
Workqueue: btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] (btrfs-endio-write)
pstate: 404000c5 (nZcv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : process_one_work+0x110/0x680
lr : worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360
Call trace:
process_one_work+0x110/0x680 (P)
worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360 (L)
worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360
kthread+0x100/0x118
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Code: f84086a1 f9000fe1 53041c21 b9003361 (f9400661)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception
SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
SMP: failed to stop secondary CPUs 2-3
Dumping ftrace buffer:
(ftrace buffer empty)
Kernel Offset: 0x275bb9540000 from 0xffff800080000000
PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffff8fbba0000000
CPU features: 0x100,00000070,00801250,8201720b
[CAUSE]
The above warning is triggered immediately after the delalloc range
failure, this happens in the following sequence:
- Range [1568K, 1636K) is dirty
1536K 1568K 1600K 1636K 1664K
| |/////////|////////| |
Where 1536K, 1600K and 1664K are page boundaries (64K page size)
- Enter extent_writepage() for page 1536K
- Enter run_delalloc_nocow() with locked page 1536K and range
[1568K, 1636K)
This is due to the inode having preallocated extents.
- Enter cow_file_range() with locked page 1536K and range
[1568K, 1636K)
- btrfs_reserve_extent() only reserved two extents
The main loop of cow_file_range() only reserved two data extents,
Now we have:
1536K 1568K 1600K 1636K 1664K
| |<-->|<--->|/|///////| |
1584K 1596K
Range [1568K, 1596K) has an ordered extent reserved.
- btrfs_reserve_extent() failed inside cow_file_range() for file offset
1596K
This is already a bug in our space reservation code, but for now let's
focus on the error handling path.
Now cow_file_range() returned -ENOSPC.
- btrfs_run_delalloc_range() do error cleanup <<< ROOT CAUSE
Call btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() with locked folio 1536K and range
[1568K, 1636K)
Function btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() normally needs to skip the
ranges inside the folio, as it will normally be cleaned up by
extent_writepage().
Such split error handling is already problematic in the first place.
What's worse is the folio range skipping itself, which is not taking
subpage cases into consideration at all, it will only skip the range
if the page start >= the range start.
In our case, the page start < the range start, since for subpage cases
we can have delalloc ranges inside the folio but not covering the
folio.
So it doesn't skip the page range at all.
This means all the ordered extents, both [1568K, 1584K) and
[1584K, 1596K) will be marked as IOERR.
And these two ordered extents have no more pending ios, they are marked
finished, and *QUEUED* to be deleted from the io tree.
- extent_writepage() do error cleanup
Call btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() for the range [1536K, 1600K).
Although ranges [1568K, 1584K) and [1584K, 1596K) are finished, the
deletion from io tree is async, it may or may not happen at this
time.
If the ranges have not yet been removed, we will do double cleaning on
those ranges, triggering the above ordered extent warnings.
In theory there are other bugs, like the cleanup in extent_writepage()
can cause double accounting on ranges that are submitted asynchronously
(compression for example).
But that's much harder to trigger because normally we do not mix regular
and compression delalloc ranges.
[FIX]
The folio range split is already buggy and not subpage compatible, it
was introduced a long time ago where subpage support was not even considered.
So instead of splitting the ordered extents cleanup into the folio range
and out of folio range, do all the cleanup inside writepage_delalloc().
- Pass @NULL as locked_folio for btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() in
btrfs_run_delalloc_range()
- Skip the btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() if writepage_delalloc()
failed
So all ordered extents are only cleaned up by
btrfs_run_delalloc_range().
- Handle the ranges that already have ordered extents allocated
If part of the folio already has ordered extent allocated, and
btrfs_run_delalloc_range() failed, we also need to cleanup that range.
Now we have a concentrated error handling for ordered extents during
btrfs_run_delalloc_range().
Fixes: d1051d6ebf ("btrfs: Fix error handling in btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are only 2 WAIT_* values left for wait parameter, we can encode
this to the function name if the waiting functionality is split.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Another conversion to folio API, use the folio locking directly instead
of back and forth page <-> folio conversions.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The check function pattern is supposed to return true/false, currently
there's only one error code.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Using the kmem cache freeing directly is clear enough, we don't need to
wrap it. All the users are in the same file.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
As extent_writepage() is internal helper we should use our inode type,
so change it from struct inode.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The double underscore naming scheme does not apply here, there's only
only get_extent_map(). As the definition is changed also pass the struct
btrfs_inode.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Drop the leading underscores in '__unlock_for_delalloc()' and rename it
to 'unlock_delalloc_folio()'. This also ensures naming parity with
'lock_delalloc_folios()'.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Commit 449813515d ("block, fs: Restore the per-bio/request data
lifetime fields") restored write-hint support in btrfs. But that is
applicable only for direct IO. This patch supports passing
write-hint for buffered IO from btrfs file system to block layer
by filling bi_write_hint of struct bio in alloc_new_bio().
There's an ongoing discussion which devices can use that,
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240910150200.6589-6-joshi.k@samsung.com,
in SCSI there's support using sd_group_number() and
sd_setup_rw32_cmnd().
The hint goes from the application directly to the block device so it's
up to the application to set up everything properly to utilize the
different hint classes.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240910150200.6589-6-joshi.k@samsung.com
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jing Xia <j.xia@samsung.com>
[ Add more context and use case. ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Print the read read policy if set as module parameter (with
CONFIG_BTRFS_EXPERIMENTAL).
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For testing purposes allow to configure the read policy via module
parameter from the beginning. Available only with CONFIG_BTRFS_EXPERIMENTAL
Examples:
- Set the RAID1 balancing method to round-robin with a custom
min_contig_read of 4k:
$ modprobe btrfs read_policy=round-robin:4096
- Set the round-robin balancing method with the default
min_contiguous_read:
$ modprobe btrfs read_policy=round-robin
- Set the "devid" balancing method, defaulting to the latest device:
$ modprobe btrfs read_policy=devid
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Commit c9c49e8f157e ("btrfs: split out CONFIG_BTRFS_EXPERIMENTAL from
CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG") introduces a way to enable or disable experimental
features, print its status during module load, like:
Btrfs loaded, experimental=on, debug=on, assert=on, zoned=yes, fsverity=yes
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add read policy that will force all reads to go to the given device
(specified by devid) on the RAID1 profiles.
This will be used for testing, e.g. to read from stale device. Users may
find other use cases.
Can be set in sysfs, the value format is "devid:<devid>" to the file
/sys/fs/btrfs/FSID/read_policy
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add round-robin read policy that balances reads over available devices
(all RAID1 block group profiles). Switch to the next devices is done
after a number of blocks is read, which is 256K by default and is
configurable in sysfs.
The format is "round-robin:<min-contig-read>" and can be set in file
/sys/fs/btrfs/FSID/read_policy
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Track number of read blocks in the whole filesystem. The counter is
initialized when devices are opened. The counter is increased at
btrfs_submit_dev_bio() if the stats tracking is enabled (depends on the
read policy). Stats tracking is disabled by default and is enabled
through fs_devices::collect_fs_stats when required.
The code is not under the EXPERIMENTAL define, as stats can be expanded
to include write counts and other performance counters, with the user
interface independent of its internal use.
This is an in-memory-only feature, not related to the dev error stats.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Enable specifying additional configuration values along the RAID1
balancing read policy in a single input string.
Update btrfs_read_policy_to_enum() to parse and handle a value
associated with the policy in the format "policy:value", the value part
if present is converted to 64-bit integer.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Introduce btrfs_read_policy_to_enum() helper to simplify the conversion
of a string read policy to its corresponding enum value. This reduces
duplication and improves code clarity in btrfs_read_policy_store().
The parameter is copied locally to allow modification, enabling the
separation of the method and its value. This prepares for the addition of
more functionality in subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Refactor the logic in btrfs_read_policy_show() for easier extension with
more balancing methods. Streamline the space and bracket handling
around the active policy without altering the functional output. This
is in preparation to add more methods.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently, fs_devices->fs_info is initialized in btrfs_init_devices_late(),
but this occurs too late for find_live_mirror(), which is invoked by
load_super_root() much earlier than btrfs_init_devices_late().
Fix this by moving the initialization to open_ctree(), before load_super_root().
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The call to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() at btrfs_setxattr() is not
necessary as we have a path setup for writing with btrfs_search_slot()
having a 'cow' argument set to 1.
This just makes the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The call to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() at btrfs_uuid_tree_add() is not
necessary as we have a path setup for writing with btrfs_search_slot()
having a 'cow' argument set to 1 (through btrfs_insert_empty_item()).
This just makes the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The call to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() at update_raid_extent_item() is not
necessary as we have a path setup for writing with btrfs_search_slot()
having a 'cow' argument set to 1.
This just makes the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The call to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() at btrfs_ioctl_default_subvol() is
not necessary as we have a path setup for writing with btrfs_search_slot()
having a 'cow' argument set to 1.
This just makes the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The call to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() at btrfs_run_dev_replace() is not
necessary as we have a path setup for writing with btrfs_search_slot()
having a 'cow' argument set to 1.
This just makes the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The call to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() at __btrfs_update_delayed_inode() is
not necessary as we have a path setup for writing with btrfs_search_slot()
having a 'cow' argument set to 1.
This just makes the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
