Since commit 43c2de1002 ("drm/rockchip: dsi: move all lane config except
LCDC mux to bind()"), we perform most HW configuration in the bind()
function. This configuration may be lost on suspend/resume, so we
need to call it again. That may lead to errors like this after system
suspend/resume:
dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip ff968000.mipi: failed to write command FIFO
panel-kingdisplay-kd097d04 ff960000.mipi.0: failed write init cmds: -110
Tested on Acer Chromebook Tab 10 (RK3399 Gru-Scarlet).
Note that early mailing list versions of this driver borrowed Rockchip's
downstream/BSP solution, to do HW configuration in mode_set() (which
*is* called at the appropriate pre-enable() times), but that was
discarded along the way. I've avoided that still, because mode_set()
documentation doesn't suggest this kind of purpose as far as I can tell.
Fixes: 43c2de1002 ("drm/rockchip: dsi: move all lane config except LCDC mux to bind()")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210928143413.v3.2.I4e9d93aadb00b1ffc7d506e3186a25492bf0b732@changeid
In commit 43c2de1002 ("drm/rockchip: dsi: move all lane config except
LCDC mux to bind()"), we moved most HW configuration to bind(), but we
didn't move the runtime PM management. Therefore, depending on initial
boot state, runtime-PM workqueue delays, and other timing factors, we
may disable our power domain in between the hardware configuration
(bind()) and when we enable the display. This can cause us to lose
hardware state and fail to configure our display. For example:
dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip ff968000.mipi: failed to write command FIFO
panel-innolux-p079zca ff960000.mipi.0: failed to write command 0
or:
dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip ff968000.mipi: failed to write command FIFO
panel-kingdisplay-kd097d04 ff960000.mipi.0: failed write init cmds: -110
We should match the runtime PM to the lifetime of the bind()/unbind()
cycle.
Tested on Acer Chrometab 10 (RK3399 Gru-Scarlet), with panel drivers
built either as modules or built-in.
Side notes: it seems one is more likely to see this problem when the
panel driver is built into the kernel. I've also seen this problem
bisect down to commits that simply changed Kconfig dependencies, because
it changed the order in which driver init functions were compiled into
the kernel, and therefore the ordering and timing of built-in device
probe.
Fixes: 43c2de1002 ("drm/rockchip: dsi: move all lane config except LCDC mux to bind()")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/9aedfb528600ecf871885f7293ca4207c84d16c1.camel@gmail.com/
Reported-by: <aleksandr.o.makarov@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210928143413.v3.1.Ic2904d37f30013a7f3d8476203ad3733c186827e@changeid
The nt35950 IC from Novatek is a Driver IC used to drive MIPI-DSI panels,
with Static RAM for content retention in command mode and also supports
video mode with VESA Frame Buffer Compression or Display Stream Compression
on single, or dual dsi port(s).
This DDIC is also capable of upscaling an input image to the panel's native
resolution, for example it can upscale a 1920x1080 input to 3840x2160 with
either bilinear interpolation or pixel duplication.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210901173127.998901-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org
Current code always sets reset line low in .pre_enable callback and
holds it low for 10ms. This is sub-optimal and increases the time
between enablement of the DSI83 and valid LVDS clock.
Rework the reset handling such that the reset line is held low for 10ms
both in probe() of the driver and .disable callback, which guarantees
that the reset line was always held low for more than 10ms and therefore
the reset line timing requirement is satisfied. Furthermore, move the
reset handling into .enable callback so the entire DSI83 initialization
is now in one place.
This reduces DSI83 enablement delay by up to 10ms.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211016210402.171595-1-marex@denx.de
I got a null-ptr-deref report:
[drm:drm_dev_init [drm]] *ERROR* Cannot allocate anonymous inode: -12
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in iput+0x3c/0x4a0
...
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x8b
kasan_report.cold+0x64/0xdb
__asan_load8+0x69/0x90
iput+0x3c/0x4a0
drm_dev_init_release+0x39/0xb0 [drm]
drm_managed_release+0x158/0x2d0 [drm]
drm_dev_init+0x3a7/0x4c0 [drm]
__devm_drm_dev_alloc+0x55/0xd0 [drm]
mi0283qt_probe+0x8a/0x2b5 [mi0283qt]
spi_probe+0xeb/0x130
...
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
If drm_fs_inode_new() fails in drm_dev_init(), dev->anon_inode will point
to PTR_ERR(...) instead of NULL. This will result in null-ptr-deref when
drm_fs_inode_free(dev->anon_inode) is called.
drm_dev_init()
drm_fs_inode_new() // fail, dev->anon_inode = PTR_ERR(...)
drm_managed_release()
drm_dev_init_release()
drm_fs_inode_free() // access non-existent anon_inode
Define a temp variable and assign it to dev->anon_inode if the temp
variable is not PTR_ERR.
Fixes: 2cbf7fc671 ("drm: Use drmm_ for drm_dev_init cleanup")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211013114139.4042207-1-wanghai38@huawei.com
The model and make of the LCD panel of the Vivax TPC-9150 is unknown,
hence the panel settings that were retrieved with a FEX dump are named
after the device NOT the actual panel.
The LCD in question is a 50 pin MISO TFT LCD panel of the resolution
1024x600 used by the aforementioned device.
Version 2, as Thierry kindly suggested that I fix the order in which the
panel was ordered compared to others.
Version 3, filling in the required info suggested by Sam. Plus some
factual issues that I've corrected myself (tested working)
Version 4, rearranged the display parameters and fix invalid bit format
issue. (Thanks Sam)
Version 5, referred to FEX file instead of manual debugging for
information.
Version 6, same as above. This time, it'll be documented.
A bit of context first: I experimented with this a long time ago whilst
I was first learning how to get Linux running on Allwinner boards, I
didn't have many resources at hand so this was quite slow. Anyways, I
stumbled upon this guide (https://linux-sunxi.org/LCD) and was reading
about how to setup the LCD for my tablet. Since I was able to make a
proper FEX dump, I was also able to read the correct parameters for
myself without relying on leaked documents or part numbers and whatnot.
In the FEX dump the value lcd_frm IS SET to 1, which means, at least
according to the document, that this display is INDEED an 18 bit per
pixel panel. Compiling U-Boot and seeing the tux in proper colors
confirmed this. As per Sam Ravnborg's suggestion, I've changed the panel
to his format "MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB666_1X7X3_SPWG", however this does not
lead to any actual change in regards to the functionality since the sunxi
panel driver just ignores this value. However, hopefully this clears up
any errors down the road as either the driver becomes advanced enough to
not ignore this value or that some other piece of software relies on
this value being known. PS: Apologies to the maintainers that have to
endure my misjudgement about how these things work.
As for the concerns about a single patch series, I wasn't sure where to
send the patches as they clearly aren't dt-bindings related and my
previous patches have ended up in drm-misc-fixes anyway. So I'm guessing
I'll be fine if I just post them in the list from last time???
Signed-off-by: Nikola Pavlica <pavlica.nikola@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211011212731.77763-1-pavlica.nikola@gmail.com
