It seems we can have one or more framebuffers that are still pinned when
suspending lmem, in such a case we end up creating a shmem backup
object, instead of evicting the object directly, but this will skip
copying the CCS aux state, since we don't allocate the extra storage for
the CCS pages as part of the ttm_tt construction. Since we can already
deal with pinned objects just fine, it doesn't seem too nasty to just
extend to support dealing with the CCS aux state, if the object is a
pinned framebuffer. This fixes display corruption (like in gnome-shell)
seen on DG2 when returning from suspend.
Fixes: da0595ae91 ("drm/i915/migrate: Evict and restore the flatccs capable lmem obj")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Cc: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.19+
Tested-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221212171958.82593-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
Starting with MTL, there will be two GT-tiles, a render and media
tile. PXP as a service for supporting workloads with protected
contexts and protected buffers can be subscribed by process
workloads on any tile. However, depending on the platform,
only one of the tiles is used for control events pertaining to PXP
operation (such as creating the arbitration session and session
tear-down).
PXP as a global feature is accessible via batch buffer instructions
on any engine/tile and the coherency across tiles is handled implicitly
by the HW. In fact, for the foreseeable future, we are expecting this
single-control-tile for the PXP subsystem.
In MTL, it's the standalone media tile (not the root tile) because
it contains the VDBOX and KCR engine (among the assets PXP relies on
for those events).
Looking at the current code design, each tile is represented by the
intel_gt structure while the intel_pxp structure currently hangs off the
intel_gt structure.
Keeping the intel_pxp structure within the intel_gt structure makes some
internal functionalities more straight forward but adds code complexity to
code readability and maintainibility to many external-to-pxp subsystems
which may need to pick the correct intel_gt structure. An example of this
would be the intel_pxp_is_active or intel_pxp_is_enabled functionality
which should be viewed as a global level inquiry, not a per-gt inquiry.
That said, this series promotes the intel_pxp structure into the
drm_i915_private structure making it a top-level subsystem and the PXP
subsystem will select the control gt internally and keep a pointer to
it for internal reference.
This promotion comes with two noteworthy changes:
1. Exported pxp functions that are called by external subsystems
(such as intel_pxp_enabled/active) will have to check implicitly
if i915->pxp is valid as that structure will not be allocated
for HW that doesn't support PXP.
2. Since GT is now considered a soft-dependency of PXP we are
ensuring that GT init happens before PXP init and vice versa
for fini. This causes a minor ordering change whereby we previously
called intel_pxp_suspend after intel_uc_suspend but now is before
i915_gem_suspend_late but the change is required for correct
dependency flows. Additionally, this re-order change doesn't
have any impact because at that point in either case, the top level
entry to i915 won't observe any PXP events (since the GPU was
quiesced during suspend_prepare). Also, any PXP event doesn't
really matter when we disable the PXP HW (global GT irqs are
already off anyway, so even if there was a bug that generated
spurious events we wouldn't see it and we would just clean it
up on resume which is okay since the default fallback action
for PXP would be to keep the sessions off at this suspend stage).
Changes from prior revs:
v11: - Reformat a comment (Tvrtko).
v10: - Change the code flow for intel_pxp_init to make it more
cleaner and readible with better comments explaining the
difference between full-PXP-feature vs the partial-teelink
inits depending on the platform. Additionally, only do
the pxp allocation when we are certain the subsystem is
needed. (Tvrtko).
v9: - Cosmetic cleanups in supported/enabled/active. (Daniele).
- Add comments for intel_pxp_init and pxp_get_ctrl_gt that
explain the functional flow for when PXP is not supported
but the backend-assets are needed for HuC authentication
(Daniele and Tvrtko).
- Fix two remaining functions that are accessible outside
PXP that need to be checking pxp ptrs before using them:
intel_pxp_irq_handler and intel_pxp_huc_load_and_auth
(Tvrtko and Daniele).
- User helper macro in pxp-debugfs (Tvrtko).
v8: - Remove pxp_to_gt macro (Daniele).
- Fix a bug in pxp_get_ctrl_gt for the case of MTL and we don't
support GSC-FW on it. (Daniele).
- Leave i915->pxp as NULL if we dont support PXP and in line
with that, do additional validity check on i915->pxp for
intel_pxp_is_supported/enabled/active (Daniele).
- Remove unncessary include header from intel_gt_debugfs.c
and check drm_minor i915->drm.primary (Daniele).
- Other cosmetics / minor issues / more comments on suspend
flow order change (Daniele).
v7: - Drop i915_dev_to_pxp and in intel_pxp_init use 'i915->pxp'
through out instead of local variable newpxp. (Rodrigo)
- In the case intel_pxp_fini is called during driver unload but
after i915 loading failed without pxp being allocated, check
i915->pxp before referencing it. (Alan)
v6: - Remove HAS_PXP macro and replace it with intel_pxp_is_supported
because : [1] introduction of 'ctrl_gt' means we correct this
for MTL's upcoming series now. [2] Also, this has little impact
globally as its only used by PXP-internal callers at the moment.
- Change intel_pxp_init/fini to take in i915 as its input to avoid
ptr-to-ptr in init/fini calls.(Jani).
- Remove the backpointer from pxp->i915 since we can use
pxp->ctrl_gt->i915 if we need it. (Rodrigo).
v5: - Switch from series to single patch (Rodrigo).
- change function name from pxp_get_kcr_owner_gt to
pxp_get_ctrl_gt.
- Fix CI BAT failure by removing redundant call to intel_pxp_fini
from driver-remove.
- NOTE: remaining open still persists on using ptr-to-ptr
and back-ptr.
v4: - Instead of maintaining intel_pxp as an intel_gt structure member
and creating a number of convoluted helpers that takes in i915 as
input and redirects to the correct intel_gt or takes any intel_gt
and internally replaces with the correct intel_gt, promote it to
be a top-level i915 structure.
v3: - Rename gt level helper functions to "intel_pxp_is_enabled/
supported/ active_on_gt" (Daniele)
- Upgrade _gt_supports_pxp to replace what was intel_gtpxp_is
supported as the new intel_pxp_is_supported_on_gt to check for
PXP feature support vs the tee support for huc authentication.
Fix pxp-debugfs-registration to use only the former to decide
support. (Daniele)
- Couple minor optimizations.
v2: - Avoid introduction of new device info or gt variables and use
existing checks / macros to differentiate the correct GT->PXP
control ownership (Daniele Ceraolo Spurio)
- Don't reuse the updated global-checkers for per-GT callers (such
as other files within PXP) to avoid unnecessary GT-reparsing,
expose a replacement helper like the prior ones. (Daniele).
v1: - Add one more patch to the series for the intel_pxp suspend/resume
for similar refactoring
References: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221202011407.4068371-1-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221208180542.998148-1-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com
If the GSC was loaded, the only way to stop it during the driver unload
flow is to do a driver-FLR.
The driver-initiated FLR is not the same as PCI config space FLR in
that it doesn't reset the SGUnit and doesn't modify the PCI config
space. Thus, it doesn't require a re-enumeration of the PCI BARs.
However, the driver-FLR does cause a memory wipe of graphics memory
on all discrete GPU platforms or a wipe limited to stolen memory
on the integrated GPU platforms.
We perform the FLR as the last action before releasing the MMIO bar, so
that we don't have to care about the consequences of the reset on the
unload flow.
v2: rename FLR function, add comment to explain FLR impact (Rodrigo),
better explain why GSC needs FLR (Alan)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221208200521.2928378-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
hwm_pcode_read_i1 is called during i915 load. This results in the following
warning from snb_pcode_read because POWER_SETUP_SUBCOMMAND_READ_I1 is
unsupported on DG1/DG2.
[drm:snb_pcode_read [i915]] warning: pcode (read from mbox 47c) \
mailbox access failed for snb_pcode_read_p [i915]: -6
The code handles the unsupported command but the warning in dmesg is
a red herring which has resulted in a couple of bugs being filed.
Therefore silence the warning by avoiding calling snb_pcode_read_p
for DG1/DG2.
Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221203031454.1280538-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com
VT-d may cause overfetch of the scanout PTE, both before and after the
vma (depending on the scanout orientation). bspec recommends that we
provide a tile-row in either directions, and suggests using 168 PTE,
warning that the accesses will wrap around the ends of the GGTT.
Currently, we fill the entire GGTT with scratch pages when using VT-d to
always ensure there are valid entries around every vma, including
scanout. However, writing every PTE is slow as on recent devices we
perform 8MiB of uncached writes, incurring an extra 100ms during resume.
If instead we focus on only putting guard pages around scanout, we can
avoid touching the whole GGTT. To avoid having to introduce extra nodes
around each scanout vma, we adjust the scanout drm_mm_node to be smaller
than the allocated space, and fixup the extra PTE during dma binding.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221130235805.221010-5-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com
Introduce the concept of padding the i915_vma with guard pages before
and after. The major consequence is that all ordinary uses of i915_vma
must use i915_vma_offset/i915_vma_size and not i915_vma.node.start/size
directly, as the drm_mm_node will include the guard pages that surround
our object.
The biggest connundrum is how exactly to mix requesting a fixed address
with guard pages, particularly through the existing uABI. The user does
not know about guard pages, so such must be transparent to the user, and
so the execobj.offset must be that of the object itself excluding the
guard. So a PIN_OFFSET_FIXED must then be exclusive of the guard pages.
The caveat is that some placements will be impossible with guard pages,
as wrap arounds need to be avoided, and the vma itself will require a
larger node. We must not report EINVAL but ENOSPC as these are unavailable
locations within the GTT rather than conflicting user requirements.
In the next patch, we start using guard pages for scanout objects. While
these are limited to GGTT vma, on a few platforms these vma (or at least
an alias of the vma) is shared with userspace, so we may leak the
existence of such guards if we are not careful to ensure that the
execobj.offset is transparent and excludes the guards. (On such platforms
like ivb, without full-ppgtt, userspace has to use relocations so the
presence of more untouchable regions within its GTT such be of no further
issue.)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221201203912.346110-1-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com
We already wrap i915_vma.node.start for use with the GGTT, as there we
can perform additional sanity checks that the node belongs to the GGTT
and fits within the 32b registers. In the next couple of patches, we
will introduce guard pages around the objects _inside_ the drm_mm_node
allocation. That is we will offset the vma->pages so that the first page
is at drm_mm_node.start + vma->guard (not 0 as is currently the case).
All users must then not use i915_vma.node.start directly, but compute
the guard offset, thus all users are converted to use a
i915_vma_offset() wrapper.
The notable exceptions are the selftests that are testing exact
behaviour of i915_vma_pin/i915_vma_insert.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221130235805.221010-3-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com
Starting with MTL, the driver needs to not only protect the steering
control register from simultaneous software accesses, but also protect
against races with hardware/firmware agents. The hardware provides a
dedicated locking mechanism to support this via the MTL_STEER_SEMAPHORE
register. Reading the register acts as a 'trylock' operation; the read
will return 0x1 if the lock is acquired or 0x0 if something else is
already holding the lock; once acquired, writing 0x1 to the register
will release the lock.
We'll continue to grab the software lock as well, just so lockdep can
track our locking; assuming the hardware lock is behaving properly,
there should never be any contention on the software lock in this case.
v2:
- Extend hardware semaphore timeout and add a taint for CI if it ever
happens (this would imply misbehaving hardware/firmware). (Mika)
- Add "MTL_" prefix to new steering semaphore register. (Mika)
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221128233014.4000136-5-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
The GuC firmware includes an extra version number to specify the
submission API level. So use that rather than the main firmware
version number for submission related checks.
Also, while it is guaranteed that GuC version number components are
only 8-bits in size, other firmwares do not have that restriction. So
stop making assumptions about them generically fitting in a u16
individually, or in a u32 as a combined 8.8.8.
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221129232031.3401386-4-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
We've been overloading uncore->lock to protect access to the MCR
steering register. That's not really what uncore->lock is intended for,
and it would be better if we didn't need to hold such a high-traffic
spinlock for the whole sequence of (apply steering, access MCR register,
restore steering). Let's create a dedicated MCR lock to protect the
steering control register over this critical section and stop relying on
the high-traffic uncore->lock.
For now the new lock is a software lock. However some platforms (MTL
and beyond) have a hardware-provided locking mechanism that can be used
to serialize not only software accesses, but also hardware/firmware
accesses as well; support for that hardware level lock will be added in
a future patch.
v2:
- Use irqsave/irqrestore spinlock calls; platforms using execlist
submission rather than GuC submission can perform MCR accesses in
interrupt context because reset -> errordump happens in a tasklet.
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221128233014.4000136-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
On XE_LPM+ platforms the media engines are carved out into a separate
GT but have a common GGTMMADR address range which essentially makes
the GGTT address space to be shared between media and render GT. As a
result any updates in GGTT shall invalidate TLB of GTs sharing it and
similarly any operation on GGTT requiring an action on a GT will have to
involve all GTs sharing it. setup_private_pat was being done on a per
GGTT based as that doesn't touch any GGTT structures moved it to per GT
based.
BSPEC: 63834
v2:
1. Add details to commit msg
2. includes fix for failure to add item to ggtt->gt_list, as suggested
by Lucas
3. as ggtt_flush() is used only for ggtt drop i915_is_ggtt check within
it.
4. setup_private_pat moved out of intel_gt_tiles_init
v3:
1. Move out for_each_gt from i915_driver.c (Jani Nikula)
v4: drop using RCU primitives on ggtt->gt_list as it is not an RCU list
(Matt Roper)
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221122070126.4813-1-aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com
Users of intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout() expect 0 return value on
success. However, we have no protection from passing back 0 potentially
returned by a call to dma_fence_wait_timeout() when it succedes right
after its timeout has expired.
Replace 0 with -ETIME before potentially using the timeout value as return
code, so -ETIME is returned if there are still some requests not retired
after timeout, 0 otherwise.
v3: Use conditional expression, more compact but also better reflecting
intention standing behind the change.
v2: Move the added lines down so flush_submission() is not affected.
Fixes: f33a8a5160 ("drm/i915: Merge wait_for_timelines with retire_request")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.5+
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221121145655.75141-3-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
Commit b97060a99b ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work
with GuC") extended the API of intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout() with an
extra argument 'remaining_timeout', intended for passing back unconsumed
portion of requested timeout when 0 (success) is returned. However, when
request retirement happens to succeed despite an error returned by a call
to dma_fence_wait_timeout(), that error code (a negative value) is passed
back instead of remaining time. If we then pass that negative value
forward as requested timeout to intel_uc_wait_for_idle(), an explicit BUG
will be triggered.
If request retirement succeeds but an error code is passed back via
remaininig_timeout, we may have no clue on how much of the initial timeout
might have been left for spending it on waiting for GuC to become idle.
OTOH, since all pending requests have been successfully retired, that
error code has been already ignored by intel_gt_retire_requests_timeout(),
then we shouldn't fail.
Assume no more time has been left on error and pass 0 timeout value to
intel_uc_wait_for_idle() to give it a chance to return success if GuC is
already idle.
v3: Don't fail on any error passed back via remaining_timeout.
v2: Fix the issue on the caller side, not the provider.
Fixes: b97060a99b ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.15+
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221121145655.75141-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
It was noticed that the table order verification step was only being
run once rather than once per firmware type. Fix that.
Note that the long term plan is to convert this code to be a mock
selftest. It is already only compiled in when selftests are enabled.
And the work involved in the conversion was estimated to be
non-trivial. So that conversion is currently low on the priority list.
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221122233328.854217-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
Engine busyness samples around a 10ms period is failing with busyness
ranging approx. from 87% to 115% as shown below. The expected range is
+/- 5% of the sample period. Fail 10% of the time.
rcs0: reported 11716042ns [91%] busyness while spinning [for 12805719ns]
When determining busyness of active engine, the GuC based engine
busyness implementation relies on a 64 bit timestamp register read. The
latency incurred by this register read causes the failure.
On DG1, when the test fails, the observed latencies range from 900us -
1.5ms.
Optimizing the 2x32 read by acquiring the lock and forcewake prior to
all reg reads reduces the rate of failure to around 2%, but does not
eliminate it.
In order to make the selftest more robust and always account for such
latencies, increase the sample period to 100 ms. This eliminates the
issue as seen in a 1000 runs.
v2: (Ashutosh)
- Add error to commit msg
- Include gitlab bug
- Update commit for inclusion of 2x32 optimized read
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4418
Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221110171913.670286-3-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
The GT MCR code currently relies on uncore->lock to avoid race
conditions on the steering control register during MCR operations. The
*_fw() versions of MCR operations expect the caller to already hold
uncore->lock, while the non-fw variants manage the lock internally.
However the sole callsite of intel_gt_mcr_wait_for_reg_fw() does not
currently obtain the forcewake lock, allowing a potential race condition
(and triggering an assertion on lockdep builds). Furthermore, since
'wait for register value' requests may not return immediately, it is
undesirable to hold a fundamental lock like uncore->lock for the entire
wait and block all other MMIO for the duration; rather the lock is only
needed around the MCR read operations and can be released during the
delays.
Convert intel_gt_mcr_wait_for_reg_fw() to a non-fw variant that will
manage uncore->lock internally. This does have the side effect of
causing an unnecessary lookup in the forcewake table on each read
operation, but since the caller is still holding the relevant forcewake
domain, this will ultimately just incremenent the reference count and
won't actually cause any additional MMIO traffic.
In the future we plan to switch to a dedicated MCR lock to protect the
steering critical section rather than using the overloaded and
high-traffic uncore->lock; on MTL and beyond the new lock can be
implemented on top of the hardware-provided synchonization mechanism for
steering.
Fixes: 3068bec83e ("drm/i915/gt: Add intel_gt_mcr_wait_for_reg_fw()")
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221117173358.1980230-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Add support for C6 residency and C state type for MTL SAMedia. Also add
mtl_drpc.
v2: Fixed review comments (Ashutosh)
v3: Sort registers and fix whitespace errors in intel_gt_regs.h (Matt R)
Remove MTL_CC_SHIFT (Ashutosh)
Adapt to RC6 residency register code refactor (Jani N)
v4: Move MTL branch to top in drpc_show
v5: Use FORCEWAKE_MT identical to gen6_drpc (Ashutosh)
v6: Add MISSING_CASE for gt_core_status switch statement (Rodrigo)
Change state name for MTL_CC0 to C0 (from "on") (Rodrigo)
v7: Change state name for MTL_CC0 to RC0 (Rodrigo)
Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221114123348.3474216-6-badal.nilawar@intel.com
Previously RC6 residency functions directly accepted RC6 residency register
MMIO offsets (there are four RC6 residency registers). This worked but
required an assumption on the residency register layout so was not future
proof.
Therefore change RC6 residency functions to accept RC6 residency types
instead of register MMIO offsets. The knowledge of register offsets as well
as ID to offset mapping is now maintained solely in intel_rc6 and can be
tailored for different platforms and different register layouts as need
arises.
v2: Address review comments by Jani N
- Change residency functions to accept RC6 residency types instead of
register ID's
- s/intel_rc6_print_rc5_res/intel_rc6_print_residency/
- Remove "const enum" in function arguments
- Naming: intel_rc6_* for enum
- Use INTEL_RC6_RES_MAX and other minor changes
v3: Don't include intel_rc6_types.h in intel_rc6.h (Jani)
Suggested-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221114123348.3474216-5-badal.nilawar@intel.com
