Randconfig builds on 32-bit machines show lots of warnings for
the i915 driver for passing a 32-bit value into __const_hweight64():
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:2584:9: error: shift count >= width of type [-Werror,-Wshift-count-overflow]
return hweight64(VDBOX_MASK(&i915->gt));
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/asm-generic/bitops/const_hweight.h:29:49: note: expanded from macro 'hweight64'
#define hweight64(w) (__builtin_constant_p(w) ? __const_hweight64(w) : __arch_hweight64(w))
Change it to hweight_long() to avoid the warning.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210103135158.3591442-1-arnd@kernel.org
Now that the tasklet completely controls scheduling of the requests, and
we postpone scheduling out the old requests, we can keep a hanging
virtual request bound to the engine on which it hung, and remove it from
te queue. On release, it will be returned to the same engine and remain
in its queue until it is scheduled; after which point it will become
eligible for transfer to a sibling. Instead, we could opt to resubmit the
request along the virtual engine on unhold, making it eligible for load
balancing immediately -- but that seems like a pointless optimisation
for a hanging context.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201224135544.1713-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Having recognised that we do not change the sibling until we schedule
out, we can then defer the decision to resubmit the virtual engine from
the unwind of the active queue to scheduling out of the virtual context.
This improves our resilence in virtual engine scheduling, and should
eliminate the rare cases of gem_exec_balance failing.
By keeping the unwind order intact on the local engine, we can preserve
data dependency ordering while doing a preempt-to-busy pass until we
have determined the new ELSP. This means that if we try to timeslice
between a virtual engine and a data-dependent ordinary request, the pair
will maintain their relative ordering and we will avoid the
resubmission, cancelling the timeslicing until further change.
The dilemma though is that we then may end up in a situation where the
'demotion' of the virtual request to an ordinary request in the engine
queue results in filling the ELSP[] with virtual requests instead of
spreading the load across the engines. To compensate for this, we mark
each virtual request and refuse to resubmit a virtual request in the
secondary ELSP slots, thus forcing subsequent virtual requests to be
scheduled out after timeslicing. By delaying the decision until we
schedule out, we will avoid unnecessary resubmission.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2079
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2098
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201224135544.1713-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The issue with stale virtual breadcrumbs remain. Now we have the problem
that if the irq-signaler is still referencing the stale breadcrumb as we
transfer it to a new sibling, the list becomes spaghetti. This is a very
small window, but that doesn't stop it being hit infrequently. To
prevent the lists being tangled (the iterator starting on one engine's
b->signalers but walking onto another list), always decouple the virtual
breadcrumb on schedule-out and make sure that the walker has stepped out
of the lists.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201224135544.1713-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Inside schedule_out, we do extra work upon idling the context, such as
updating the runtime, kicking off retires, kicking virtual engines.
However, if we are in a series of processing single requests per
contexts, we may find ourselves scheduling out the context, only to
immediately schedule it back in during dequeue. This is just extra work
that we can avoid if we keep the context marked as inflight across the
dequeue. This becomes more significant later on for minimising virtual
engine misses.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201224135544.1713-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Once a virtual engine has been bound to a sibling, it will remain bound
until we finally schedule out the last active request. We can not rebind
the context to a new sibling while it is inflight as the context save
will conflict, hence we wait. As we cannot then use any other sibliing
while the context is inflight, only kick the bound sibling while it
inflight and upon scheduling out the kick the rest (so that we can swap
engines on timeslicing if the previously bound engine becomes
oversubscribed).
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201224135544.1713-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Rather than having special case code for opportunistically calling
process_csb() and performing a direct submit while holding the engine
spinlock for submitting the request, simply call the tasklet directly.
This allows us to retain the direct submission path, including the CS
draining to allow fast/immediate submissions, without requiring any
duplicated code paths, and most importantly greatly simplifying the
control flow by removing reentrancy. This will enable us to close a few
races in the virtual engines in the next few patches.
The trickiest part here is to ensure that paired operations (such as
schedule_in/schedule_out) remain under consistent locking domains,
e.g. when pulled outside of the engine->active.lock
v2: Use bh kicking, see commit 3c53776e29 ("Mark HI and TASKLET
softirq synchronous").
v3: Update engine-reset to be tasklet aware
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201224135544.1713-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We assume that both timestamps are driven off the same clock [reported
to userspace as I915_PARAM_CS_TIMESTAMP_FREQUENCY]. Verify that this is
so by reading the timestamp registers around a busywait (on an otherwise
idle engine so there should be no preemptions).
v2: Icelake (not ehl, nor tgl) seems to be using a fixed 80ns interval
for, and only for, CTX_TIMESTAMP -- or it may be GPU frequency and the
test is always running at maximum frequency?. As far as I can tell, this
isolated change in behaviour is undocumented.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201223122359.22562-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The caller determines if the failure is an error or not, so avoid
warning when we will try again and succeed. For example,
<7> [111.319321] [drm:intel_guc_fw_upload [i915]] GuC status 0x20
<3> [111.319340] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* GuC load failed: status = 0x00000020
<3> [111.319606] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* GuC load failed: status: Reset = 0, BootROM = 0x10, UKernel = 0x00, MIA = 0x00, Auth = 0x00
<7> [111.320045] [drm:__uc_init_hw [i915]] GuC fw load failed: -110; will reset and retry 2 more time(s)
<7> [111.322978] [drm:intel_guc_fw_upload [i915]] GuC status 0x8002f0ec
should not have been reported as a _test_ failure, as the GuC was
successfully loaded on the second attempt and the system remained
operational.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2797
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201214100949.11387-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since we allow removing the timeline map at runtime, there is a risk
that rq->hwsp points into a stale page. To control that risk, we hold
the RCU read lock while reading *rq->hwsp, but we missed a couple of
important barriers. First, the unpinning / removal of the timeline map
must be after all RCU readers into that map are complete, i.e. after an
rcu barrier (in this case courtesy of call_rcu()). Secondly, we must
make sure that the rq->hwsp we are about to dereference under the RCU
lock is valid. In this case, we make the rq->hwsp pointer safe during
i915_request_retire() and so we know that rq->hwsp may become invalid
only after the request has been signaled. Therefore is the request is
not yet signaled when we acquire rq->hwsp under the RCU, we know that
rq->hwsp will remain valid for the duration of the RCU read lock.
This is a very small window that may lead to either considering the
request not completed (causing a delay until the request is checked
again, any wait for the request is not affected) or dereferencing an
invalid pointer.
Fixes: 3adac4689f ("drm/i915: Introduce concept of per-timeline (context) HWSP")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.1+
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201218122421.18344-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Matthew Brost pointed out that the while-loop on a shared breadcrumb was
inherently fraught with danger as it competed with the other users of
the breadcrumbs. However, in order to completely drain the re-arming irq
worker, the while-loop is a necessity, despite my optimism that we could
force cancellation with a couple of irq_work invocations.
Given that we can't merely drop the while-loop, use an activity counter on
the breadcrumbs to detect when we are parking the breadcrumbs for the
last time.
Based on a patch by Matthew Brost.
Reported-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Fixes: 9d5612ca16 ("drm/i915/gt: Defer enabling the breadcrumb interrupt to after submission")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201217091524.10258-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
