While loading the DMC firmware we were double checking the headers made
sense, but in no place we checked that we were actually reading memory
we were supposed to. This could be wrong in case the firmware file is
truncated or malformed.
Before this patch:
# ls -l /lib/firmware/i915/icl_dmc_ver1_07.bin
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 25716 Feb 1 12:26 icl_dmc_ver1_07.bin
# truncate -s 25700 /lib/firmware/i915/icl_dmc_ver1_07.bin
# modprobe i915
# dmesg| grep -i dmc
[drm:intel_csr_ucode_init [i915]] Loading i915/icl_dmc_ver1_07.bin
[drm] Finished loading DMC firmware i915/icl_dmc_ver1_07.bin (v1.7)
i.e. it loads random data. Now it fails like below:
[drm:intel_csr_ucode_init [i915]] Loading i915/icl_dmc_ver1_07.bin
[drm:csr_load_work_fn [i915]] *ERROR* Truncated DMC firmware, rejecting.
i915 0000:00:02.0: Failed to load DMC firmware i915/icl_dmc_ver1_07.bin. Disabling runtime power management.
i915 0000:00:02.0: DMC firmware homepage: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/i915
Before reading any part of the firmware file, validate the input first.
Fixes: eb805623d8 ("drm/i915/skl: Add support to load SKL CSR firmware.")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190605235535.17791-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
The error messages could be more descriptive, but fix these caused by
file moves:
WARNING: kernel-doc './scripts/kernel-doc -rst -enable-lineno -internal
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c' failed with return code 2
WARNING: kernel-doc './scripts/kernel-doc -rst -enable-lineno -function
User command execution ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c'
failed with return code 1
WARNING: kernel-doc './scripts/kernel-doc -rst -enable-lineno -internal
./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c' failed with return code 2
WARNING: kernel-doc './scripts/kernel-doc -rst -enable-lineno -function
buffer object tiling ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c'
failed with return code 1
Fixes: 10be98a77c ("drm/i915: Move more GEM objects under gem/")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190605095657.23601-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
In this patch, intel_color_get_config() is enabled and support
for read_luts() will be added platform by platform incrementally
in the follow-up patches.
v4: -Renamed intel_get_color_config to intel_color_get_config [Jani]
-Added the user early on such that support for get_color_config()
can be added platform by platform incrementally [Jani]
v5: -Incorrect place for calling intel_color_get_config() in
haswell_get_pipe_config() [Ville]
v6: -Renamed intel_color_read_luts() to intel_color_get_config()
[Jani and Ville]
Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1559123462-7343-3-git-send-email-swati2.sharma@intel.com
In this patch, a vfunc read_luts() is introduced to create a hw lut
i.e. lut having values read from gamma/degamma registers which will
later be used to compare with sw lut to validate gamma/degamma lut values.
v3: -Rebase
v4: -Renamed intel_get_color_config to intel_color_get_config [Jani]
-Wrapped get_color_config() [Jani]
v5: -Renamed intel_color_get_config() to intel_color_read_luts()
-Renamed get_color_config to read_luts
v6: -Renamed intel_color_read_luts() back to intel_color_get_config()
[Jani and Ville]
Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1559123462-7343-2-git-send-email-swati2.sharma@intel.com
Instead of relying on the caller holding struct_mutex across the
allocation, push the allocation under a tree of spinlocks stored inside
the page tables. Not only should this allow us to avoid struct_mutex
here, but it will allow multiple users to lock independent ranges for
concurrent allocations, and operate independently. This is vital for
pushing the GTT manipulation into a background thread where dependency
on struct_mutex is verboten, and for allowing other callers to avoid
struct_mutex altogether.
v2: Restore lost GEM_BUG_ON for removing too many PTE from
gen6_ppgtt_clear_range.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190604153830.19096-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As the fence registers are not part of the engine powerwells, we do not
need to fiddle with forcewake in order to update a fence. Avoid using
the heavyweight debug checking normal mmio writes as the checking
dominates the selftest runtime and is superfluous!
In the process, retire the I915_WRITE() implicit macro with the new
intel_uncore_write interface.
v2: s/unc/uncore/
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190604120022.20472-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Stop dumping plane->state for planes. That is the old state most of the
time and dumping stale information only serves to confuse people.
Instead dump the new state just for the planes included in the
operation. For now we'll include only the planes for the modeset/fastset
pipes in the dumps. But probably we want to dump them all eventually,
just not quite sure how to present that information nicely to the user.
And while at it let's dump a few more interesting bits from the state.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190517193132.8140-14-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Currently, we try to report to the shrinker the precise number of
objects (pages) that are available to be reaped at this moment. This
requires searching all objects with allocated pages to see if they
fulfill the search criteria, and this count is performed quite
frequently. (The shrinker tries to free ~128 pages on each invocation,
before which we count all the objects; counting takes longer than
unbinding the objects!) If we take the pragmatic view that with
sufficient desire, all objects are eventually reapable (they become
inactive, or no longer used as framebuffer etc), we can simply return
the count of pinned pages maintained during get_pages/put_pages rather
than walk the lists every time.
The downside is that we may (slightly) over-report the number of
objects/pages we could shrink and so penalize ourselves by shrinking
more than required. This is mitigated by keeping the order in which we
shrink objects such that we avoid penalizing active and frequently used
objects, and if memory is so tight that we need to free them we would
need to anyway.
v2: Only expose shrinkable objects to the shrinker; a small reduction in
not considering stolen and foreign objects.
v3: Restore the tracking from a "backup" copy from before the gem/ split
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190530203500.26272-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Currently the purgeable objects, I915_MADV_DONTNEED, are mixed in the
normal bound/unbound lists. Every shrinker pass starts with an attempt
to purge from this set of unneeded objects, which entails us doing a
walk over both lists looking for any candidates. If there are none, and
since we are shrinking we can reasonably assume that the lists are
full!, this becomes a very slow futile walk.
If we separate out the purgeable objects into own list, this search then
becomes its own phase that is preferentially handled during shrinking.
Instead the cost becomes that we then need to filter the purgeable list
if we want to distinguish between bound and unbound objects.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190530203500.26272-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
