These plls are found in the Tensor gs101 SoC found in the Pixel 6.
pll0516x: Integer PLL with high frequency
pll0517x: Integer PLL with middle frequency
pll0518x: Integer PLL with low frequency
PLL0516x
FOUT = (MDIV * 2 * FIN)/PDIV * 2^SDIV)
PLL0517x and PLL0518x
FOUT = (MDIV * FIN)/PDIV*2^SDIV)
The PLLs are similar enough to pll_0822x that the same code can handle
both. The main difference is the change in the fout formula for the
high frequency 0516 pll.
Locktime for 516,517 & 518 is 150 the same as the pll_0822x lock factor.
MDIV, SDIV PDIV masks and bit shifts are also the same as 0822x.
When defining the PLL the "con" parameter should be set to CON3
register, like this
PLL(pll_0517x, CLK_FOUT_SHARED0_PLL, "fout_shared0_pll", "oscclk",
PLL_LOCKTIME_PLL_SHARED0, PLL_CON3_PLL_SHARED0,
NULL),
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Will McVicker <willmcvicker@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231211162331.435900-8-peter.griffin@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Samsung Devicetree bindings topic branch for v6.8
Topic branch collecting several changes to Samsung SoC Devicetree
bindings:
1. Add specific compatibles to all Samsung Exynos and Tesla FSD blocks,
because that's what guidelines expect [1] and is generally
recommended practice. Existing compatibles are left untouched, thus
no driver changes are needed. The work only cleans things up, so any
future contributions will use recommended style: specific and
fallback compatibles.
2. Add bindings for new devices: Samsung ExynosAutov920 and Google
GS101.
These bindings are needed for both DTS and drivers, e.g. clock drivers.
Specifying samsung,uart-fifosize in both DT and driver static data is error
prone and relies on driver probe order and dt aliases to be correct.
Additionally on many Exynos platforms these are (USI) universal serial
interfaces which can be uart, spi or i2c, so it can change per board.
For google,gs101-uart make samsung,uart-fifosize a required property.
For this platform fifosize now *only* comes from DT.
Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231211162331.435900-5-peter.griffin@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Tesla FSD is a derivative of Samsung Exynos SoC, thus just like the
others it reuses several devices from older designs. Historically we
kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine and there is no
bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add Tesla FSD compatible specific to be used with an existing fallback.
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205092229.19135-6-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Tesla FSD is a derivative of Samsung Exynos SoC, thus just like the
others it reuses several devices from older designs. Historically we
kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine and there is no
bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add Tesla FSD compatible specific to be used with an existing fallback.
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205092229.19135-5-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Tesla FSD is a derivative of Samsung Exynos SoC, thus just like the
others it reuses several devices from older designs. Historically we
kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine and there is no
bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add Tesla FSD compatible specific to be used with an existing fallback.
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205092229.19135-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Tesla FSD is a derivative of Samsung Exynos SoC, thus just like the
others it reuses several devices from older designs. Historically we
kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine and there is no
bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add Tesla FSD compatible specific to be used with an existing fallback.
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205092229.19135-3-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Tesla FSD is a derivative of Samsung Exynos SoC, thus just like the
others it reuses several devices from older designs. Historically we
kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine and there is no
bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add Tesla FSD compatible specific to be used with an existing fallback.
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205092229.19135-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus
historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine
and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like
compatibles.
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108104343.24192-13-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus
historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine
and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like
compatibles.
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108104343.24192-12-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus
historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine
and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like
compatibles.
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108104343.24192-11-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus
historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine
and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like
compatibles.
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108104343.24192-10-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus
historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine
and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like
compatibles.
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108104343.24192-9-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus
historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine
and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like
compatibles.
Re-shuffle also the entries in compatibles, so the one-compatible-enum
is the first.
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108104343.24192-8-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus
historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine
and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like
compatibles.
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108104343.24192-7-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus
historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine
and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like
compatibles.
While re-indenting the first enum, put also axis,artpec8-dw-mshc in
alphabetical order.
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108104343.24192-5-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus
historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine
and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like
compatibles.
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108104343.24192-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus
historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine
and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like
compatibles.
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108104343.24192-3-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus
historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine
and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
1. Compatibles should be specific.
2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like
compatibles.
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108104343.24192-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Pull parisc architecture fixes from Helge Deller:
- Include the upper 5 address bits when inserting TLB entries on a
64-bit kernel.
On physical machines those are ignored, but in qemu it's nice to have
them included and to be correct.
- Stop the 64-bit kernel and show a warning if someone tries to boot on
a machine with a 32-bit CPU
- Fix a "no previous prototype" warning in parport-gsc
* tag 'parisc-for-6.7-rc1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux:
parisc: Prevent booting 64-bit kernels on PA1.x machines
parport: gsc: mark init function static
parisc/pgtable: Do not drop upper 5 address bits of physical address
Pull LoongArch updates from Huacai Chen:
- support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC with static keys
- relax memory ordering for atomic operations
- support BPF CPU v4 instructions for LoongArch
- some build and runtime warning fixes
* tag 'loongarch-6.7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chenhuacai/linux-loongson:
selftests/bpf: Enable cpu v4 tests for LoongArch
LoongArch: BPF: Support signed mod instructions
LoongArch: BPF: Support signed div instructions
LoongArch: BPF: Support 32-bit offset jmp instructions
LoongArch: BPF: Support unconditional bswap instructions
LoongArch: BPF: Support sign-extension mov instructions
LoongArch: BPF: Support sign-extension load instructions
LoongArch: Add more instruction opcodes and emit_* helpers
LoongArch/smp: Call rcutree_report_cpu_starting() earlier
LoongArch: Relax memory ordering for atomic operations
LoongArch: Mark __percpu functions as always inline
LoongArch: Disable module from accessing external data directly
LoongArch: Support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC with static keys
Pull powerpc fixes from Michael Ellerman:
- Finish a refactor of pgprot_framebuffer() which dependend
on some changes that were merged via the drm tree
- Fix some kernel-doc warnings to quieten the bots
Thanks to Nathan Lynch and Thomas Zimmermann.
* tag 'powerpc-6.7-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux:
powerpc/rtas: Fix ppc_rtas_rmo_buf_show() kernel-doc
powerpc/pseries/rtas-work-area: Fix rtas_work_area_reserve_arena() kernel-doc
powerpc/fb: Call internal __phys_mem_access_prot() in fbdev code
powerpc: Remove file parameter from phys_mem_access_prot()
powerpc/machdep: Remove trailing whitespaces
Pull smb client fixes from Steve French:
- ctime caching fix (for setxattr)
- encryption fix
- DNS resolver mount fix
- debugging improvements
- multichannel fixes including cases where server stops or starts
supporting multichannel after mount
- reconnect fix
- minor cleanups
* tag '6.7-rc-smb3-client-fixes-part2' of git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6:
cifs: update internal module version number for cifs.ko
cifs: handle when server stops supporting multichannel
cifs: handle when server starts supporting multichannel
Missing field not being returned in ioctl CIFS_IOC_GET_MNT_INFO
smb3: allow dumping session and tcon id to improve stats analysis and debugging
smb: client: fix mount when dns_resolver key is not available
smb3: fix caching of ctime on setxattr
smb3: minor cleanup of session handling code
cifs: reconnect work should have reference on server struct
cifs: do not pass cifs_sb when trying to add channels
cifs: account for primary channel in the interface list
cifs: distribute channels across interfaces based on speed
cifs: handle cases where a channel is closed
smb3: more minor cleanups for session handling routines
smb3: minor RDMA cleanup
cifs: Fix encryption of cleared, but unset rq_iter data buffers
Pull probes fixes from Masami Hiramatsu:
- Documentation update: Add a note about argument and return value
fetching is the best effort because it depends on the type.
- objpool: Fix to make internal global variables static in
test_objpool.c.
- kprobes: Unify kprobes_exceptions_nofify() prototypes. There are the
same prototypes in asm/kprobes.h for some architectures, but some of
them are missing the prototype and it causes a warning. So move the
prototype into linux/kprobes.h.
- tracing: Fix to check the tracepoint event and return event at
parsing stage. The tracepoint event doesn't support %return but if
$retval exists, it will be converted to %return silently. This finds
that case and rejects it.
- tracing: Fix the order of the descriptions about the parameters of
__kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start() to be consistent with the argument
list of the function.
* tag 'probes-fixes-v6.7-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace:
tracing/kprobes: Fix the order of argument descriptions
tracing: fprobe-event: Fix to check tracepoint event and return
kprobes: unify kprobes_exceptions_nofify() prototypes
lib: test_objpool: make global variables static
Documentation: tracing: Add a note about argument and retval access
Pull fbdev fixes and cleanups from Helge Deller:
- fix double free and resource leaks in imsttfb
- lots of remove callback cleanups and section mismatch fixes in
omapfb, amifb and atmel_lcdfb
- error code fix and memparse simplification in omapfb
* tag 'fbdev-for-6.7-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/linux-fbdev: (31 commits)
fbdev: fsl-diu-fb: mark wr_reg_wa() static
fbdev: amifb: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
fbdev: amifb: Mark driver struct with __refdata to prevent section mismatch warning
fbdev: hyperv_fb: fix uninitialized local variable use
fbdev: omapfb/tpd12s015: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
fbdev: omapfb/tfp410: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
fbdev: omapfb/sharp-ls037v7dw01: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
fbdev: omapfb/opa362: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
fbdev: omapfb/hdmi: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
fbdev: omapfb/dvi: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
fbdev: omapfb/dsi-cm: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
fbdev: omapfb/dpi: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
fbdev: omapfb/analog-tv: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
fbdev: atmel_lcdfb: Convert to platform remove callback returning void
fbdev: omapfb/tpd12s015: Don't put .remove() in .exit.text and drop suppress_bind_attrs
fbdev: omapfb/tfp410: Don't put .remove() in .exit.text and drop suppress_bind_attrs
fbdev: omapfb/sharp-ls037v7dw01: Don't put .remove() in .exit.text and drop suppress_bind_attrs
fbdev: omapfb/opa362: Don't put .remove() in .exit.text and drop suppress_bind_attrs
fbdev: omapfb/hdmi: Don't put .remove() in .exit.text and drop suppress_bind_attrs
fbdev: omapfb/dvi: Don't put .remove() in .exit.text and drop suppress_bind_attrs
...
Pull drm fixes from Daniel Vetter:
"Dave's VPN to the big machine died, so it's on me to do fixes pr this
and next week while everyone else is at plumbers.
- big pile of amd fixes, but mostly for hw support newly added in 6.7
- i915 fixes, mostly minor things
- qxl memory leak fix
- vc4 uaf fix in mock helpers
- syncobj fix for DRM_SYNCOBJ_WAIT_FLAGS_WAIT_AVAILABLE"
* tag 'drm-next-2023-11-10' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm: (78 commits)
drm/amdgpu: fix error handling in amdgpu_vm_init
drm/amdgpu: Fix possible null pointer dereference
drm/amdgpu: move UVD and VCE sched entity init after sched init
drm/amdgpu: move kfd_resume before the ip late init
drm/amd: Explicitly check for GFXOFF to be enabled for s0ix
drm/amdgpu: Change WREG32_RLC to WREG32_SOC15_RLC where inst != 0 (v2)
drm/amdgpu: Use correct KIQ MEC engine for gfx9.4.3 (v5)
drm/amdgpu: add smu v13.0.6 pcs xgmi ras error query support
drm/amdgpu: fix software pci_unplug on some chips
drm/amd/display: remove duplicated argument
drm/amdgpu: correct mca debugfs dump reg list
drm/amdgpu: correct acclerator check architecutre dump
drm/amdgpu: add pcs xgmi v6.4.0 ras support
drm/amdgpu: Change extended-scope MTYPE on GC 9.4.3
drm/amdgpu: disable smu v13.0.6 mca debug mode by default
drm/amdgpu: Support multiple error query modes
drm/amdgpu: refine smu v13.0.6 mca dump driver
drm/amdgpu: Do not program PF-only regs in hdp_v4_0.c under SRIOV (v2)
drm/amdgpu: Skip PCTL0_MMHUB_DEEPSLEEP_IB write in jpegv4.0.3 under SRIOV
drm: amd: Resolve Sphinx unexpected indentation warning
...
