Driver Changes:
- Avoid infinite GPU waits by avoidin premature release of request's
reusable memory (Chris, Janusz)
- Expose RPS thresholds in sysfs (Tvrtko)
- Apply GuC SLPC min frequency softlimit correctly (Vinay)
- Restore SLPC efficient freq earlier (Vinay)
- Consider OA buffer boundary when zeroing out reports (Umesh)
- Extend Wa_14015795083 to TGL, RKL, DG1 and ADL (Matt R)
- Fix context workarounds with non-masked regs on MTL/DG2 (Lucas)
- Enable the CCS_FLUSH bit in the pipe control and in the CS for MTL+ (Andi)
- Update MTL workarounds 14018778641, 22016122933 (Tejas, Zhanjun)
- Ensure memory quiesced before AUX CCS invalidation (Jonathan)
- Add a gsc_info debugfs (Daniele)
- Invalidate the TLBs on each GT on multi-GT device (Chris)
- Fix a VMA UAF for multi-gt platform (Nirmoy)
- Do not use stolen on MTL due to HW bug (Nirmoy)
- Check HuC and GuC version compatibility on MTL (Daniele)
- Dump perf_limit_reasons for slow GuC init debug (Vinay)
- Replace kmap() with kmap_local_page() (Sumitra, Ira)
- Add sentinel to xehp_oa_b_counters for KASAN (Andrzej)
- Add the gen12_needs_ccs_aux_inv helper (Andi)
- Fixes and updates for GSC memory allocation (Daniele)
- Fix one wrong caching mode enum usage (Tvrtko)
- Fixes for GSC wakeref (Alan)
- Static checker fixes (Harshit, Arnd, Dan, Cristophe, David, Andi)
- Rename flags with bit_group_X according to the datasheet (Andi)
- Use direct alias for i915 in requests (Andrzej)
- Replace i915->gt0 with to_gt(i915) (Andi)
- Use the i915_vma_flush_writes helper (Tvrtko)
- Selftest improvements (Alan)
- Remove dead code (Tvrtko)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
# Conflicts:
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ZMy6kDd9npweR4uy@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com
- Removing unused declarations (Arnd, Gustavo)
- ICL+ DSI modeset sequence fixes (Ville)
- Improvements on HDCP (Suraj)
- Fixes and clean up on MTL Display (Mika Kahola, Lee, RK, Nirmoy, Chaitanya)
- Restore HSW/BDW PSR1 (Ville)
- Other PSR Fixes (Jouni)
- Fixes around DC states and other Display Power (Imre)
- Init DDI ports in VBT order (Ville)
- General documentation fixes (Jani)
- General refactor for better organization (Jani)
- Bigjoiner fix (Stanislav)
- VDSC Fixes and improvements (Stanialav, Suraj)
- Hotplug fixes and improvements (Simon, Suraj)
- Start using plane scale factor for relative data rate (Stanislav)
- Use shmem for dpt objects (RK)
- Simplify expression &to_i915(dev)->drm (Uwe)
- Do not access i915_gem_object members from frontbuffer tracking (Jouni)
- Fix uncore race around i915->params.mmio_debug (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ZMv4RCzGyCmG/BDe@intel.com
When a symbol is selected that has extra dependencies,
anything that selects it must have the same dependencies.
With the added CONFIG_DRM reference from I2C_HID_CORE,
this broke a couple of drivers that now also depend
on DRM:
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for I2C_HID_CORE
Depends on [m]: HID_SUPPORT [=y] && I2C_HID [=y] && (DRM [=m] || !DRM [=m])
Selected by [y]:
- I2C_HID_OF [=y] && HID_SUPPORT [=y] && I2C_HID [=y]
- I2C_HID_ACPI [=y] && HID_SUPPORT [=y] && I2C_HID [=y] && ACPI [=y]
- I2C_HID_OF_GOODIX [=y] && HID_SUPPORT [=y] && I2C_HID [=y] && OF [=y]
x86_64-linux-ld: vmlinux.o: in function `i2c_hid_core_remove':
(.text+0xfc8826): undefined reference to `drm_panel_remove_follower'
x86_64-linux-ld: vmlinux.o: in function `i2c_hid_core_probe':
(.text+0xfc8da0): undefined reference to `drm_is_panel_follower'
Add the corresponding DRM||!DRM dependencies on each one that
is affected.
Fixes: 96a37bfd23 ("HID: i2c-hid: Support being a panel follower")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230802124947.1355415-1-arnd@kernel.org
Use fb_info() to print status message at the end of the probe function,
which avoids decoding the devices. fb_info() works with or without an
fbdev kernel device. Fixes the following error:
../drivers/video/fbdev/ps3fb.c: In function 'ps3fb_probe':
../drivers/video/fbdev/ps3fb.c:1172:40: error: 'struct fb_info' has no member named 'dev'
1172 | dev_driver_string(info->dev), dev_name(info->dev),
| ^~
../include/linux/dev_printk.h:110:37: note: in definition of macro 'dev_printk_index_wrap'
110 | _p_func(dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/video/fbdev/ps3fb.c:1171:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_info'
1171 | dev_info(info->device, "%s %s, using %u KiB of video memory\n",
| ^~~~~~~~
../drivers/video/fbdev/ps3fb.c:1172:61: error: 'struct fb_info' has no member named 'dev'
1172 | dev_driver_string(info->dev), dev_name(info->dev),
| ^~
../include/linux/dev_printk.h:110:37: note: in definition of macro 'dev_printk_index_wrap'
110 | _p_func(dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/video/fbdev/ps3fb.c:1171:9: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_info'
1171 | dev_info(info->device, "%s %s, using %u KiB of video memory\n",
| ^~~~~~~~
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ccc63065-2976-88ef-1211-731330bf2866@infradead.org/
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Fixes: 701d2054fa ("fbdev: Make support for userspace interfaces configurable")
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230731175535.11345-1-tzimmermann@suse.de
This should be done before the soft min/max frequencies are restored.
When we disable the "Ignore efficient frequency" flag, GuC does not
actually bring the requested freq down to RPn.
Specifically, this scenario-
- ignore efficient freq set to true
- reduce min to RPn (from efficient)
- suspend
- resume (includes GuC load, restore soft min/max, restore efficient freq)
- validate min freq has been resored to RPn
This will fail if we didn't first restore(disable, in this case) efficient
freq flag before setting the soft min frequency.
v2: Bring the min freq down to RPn when we disable efficient freq (Rodrigo)
Also made the change to set the min softlimit to RPn at init. Otherwise, we
were storing RPe there.
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8736
Fixes: 55f9720dbf ("drm/i915/guc/slpc: Provide sysfs for efficient freq")
Fixes: 95ccf312a1 ("drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allow SLPC to use efficient frequency")
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230726010044.3280402-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com
DRM bridges are not visible to the userspace and it may not be
immediately clear if the chain is somehow constructed incorrectly. I
have had two separate instances of a bridge driver failing to do a
drm_bridge_attach() call, resulting in the bridge connector not being
part of the chain. In some situations this doesn't seem to cause issues,
but it will if DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR flag is used.
Add a debugfs file to print the bridge chains. For me, on this TI AM62
based platform, I get the following output:
encoder[39]
bridge[0] type: 0, ops: 0x0
bridge[1] type: 0, ops: 0x0, OF: /bus@f0000/i2c@20000000/dsi@e:toshiba,tc358778
bridge[2] type: 0, ops: 0x3, OF: /bus@f0000/i2c@20010000/hdmi@48:lontium,lt8912b
bridge[3] type: 11, ops: 0x7, OF: /hdmi-connector:hdmi-connector
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230802-drm-bridge-chain-debugfs-v4-1-7e3ae3d137c0@ideasonboard.com
Convert platform_get_resource_byname() + devm_ioremap_resource() to a
single call to devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(), as this is
exactly what this function does.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
It is possible that dma_request_chan() returns EPROBE_DEFER, in which
case the driver defers probing without printing any message. Use
dev_err_probe() to record the probe deferral cause and ease debugging.
Signed-off-by: Wang Ming <machel@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c:793: warning: expecting prototype for zynqmp_dp_link_train(). Prototype was for zynqmp_dp_train() instead
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
As talked about in the patch ("drm/panel: Add a way for other devices
to follow panel state"), we really want to keep the power states of a
touchscreen and the panel it's attached to in sync with each other. In
that spirit, add support to i2c-hid to be a panel follower. This will
let the i2c-hid driver get informed when the panel is powered on and
off. From there we can match the i2c-hid device's power state to that
of the panel.
NOTE: this patch specifically _doesn't_ use pm_runtime to keep track
of / manage the power state of the i2c-hid device, even though my
first instinct said that would be the way to go. Specific problems
with using pm_runtime():
* The initial power up couldn't happen in a runtime resume function
since it create sub-devices and, apparently, that's not good to do
in your resume function.
* Managing our power state with pm_runtime meant fighting to make the
right thing happen at system suspend to prevent the system from
trying to resume us only to suspend us again. While this might be
able to be solved, it added complexity.
Overall the code without pm_runtime() ended up being smaller and
easier to understand.
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230727101636.v4.9.Ib1a98309c455cd7e26b931c69993d4fba33bbe15@changeid
In the i2c-hid remove() function we currently try to power off,
depopulate our child device, and free our resources. That's OK, but...
* If the i2c-hid device is on a power rail that can't turn off (either
an always-on or a shared power rail) we won't try to put the device
in a low power state during remove(). This probably doesn't matter
for very many devices but it could be nice in some instances.
* If the i2c-hid device somehow manages to generate an interrupt after
we tried to power off it is conceivable that the interrupt could
arrive during or after the call to hid_destroy_device() but before
the call to free_irq(). That could cause a crash since our IRQ
handler isn't expecting it. One could imagine this happening in
the case where we couldn't turn off (see the previous bullet) or,
possibly, if the interrupt line could glitch shortly after the
device powered off.
Let's call the suspend code during remove to avoid these issues. That
will put the device into a low power state and also disable
interrupts.
Technically, one could consider this a "fix" of commit 4a200c3b9a
("HID: i2c-hid: introduce HID over i2c specification implementation").
However, since the above bullet points are more theoretical than
problems seen on real systems and since the remove() of an i2c-hid
touchscreen isn't terribly likely to be called in production, it's
probably not worth the bother of trying to backport it.
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230727101636.v4.8.Ic3ecad4a825905f4e4ce2a772b17f3c9cb2d60a2@changeid
These days, it's fairly common to see panels that have touchscreens
attached to them. The panel and the touchscreen can somewhat be
thought of as totally separate devices and, historically, this is how
Linux has treated them. However, treating them as separate isn't
necessarily the best way to model the two devices, it was just that
there was no better way. Specifically, there is little practical
reason to have the touchscreen powered on when the panel is turned
off, but if we model the devices separately we have no way to keep the
two devices' power states in sync with each other.
The issue described above makes it sound as if the problem here is
just about efficiency. We're wasting power keeping the touchscreen
powered up when the screen is off. While that's true, the problem can
go deeper. Specifically, hardware designers see that there's no reason
to have the touchscreen on while the screen is off and then build
hardware assuming that software would never turn the touchscreen on
while the screen is off.
In the very simplest case of hardware designs like this, the
touchscreen and the panel share some power rails. In most cases, this
turns out not to be terrible and is, again, just a little less
efficient. Specifically if we tell Linux that the touchscreen and the
panel are using the same rails then Linux will keep the rails on when
_either_ device is turned on. That ends to work OK-ish, but now if you
turn the panel off not only will the touchscreen remain powered, but
the power rails for the panel itself won't be switched off, burning
extra power.
The above two inefficiencies are _extra_ minor when you consider the
fact that laptops rarely spend much time with the screen off. The main
use case would be when an external screen (and presumably a power
supply) is attached.
Unfortunately, it gets worse from here. On sc7180-trogdor-homestar,
for instance, the display's TCON (timing controller) sometimes crashes
if you don't power cycle it whenever you stop and restart the video
stream (like during a modeset). The touchscreen keeping the power
rails on causes real problems. One proposal in the homestar timeframe
was to move the touchscreen to an always-on rail, dedicating the main
power rail to the panel. That caused _different_ problems as talked
about in commit 557e05fa9f ("HID: i2c-hid: goodix: Stop tying the
reset line to the regulator"). The end result of all of this was to
add an extra regulator to the board, increasing cost.
Recently, Cong Yang posted a patch [1] where things are even worse.
The panel and touch controller on that system seem even more
intimately tied together and really can't be thought of separately.
To address this issue, let's start allowing devices to register
themselves as "panel followers". These devices will get called after a
panel has been powered on and before a panel is powered off. This
makes the panel the primary device in charge of the power state, which
matches how userspace uses it.
The panel follower API should be fairly straightforward to use. The
current code assumes that panel followers are using device tree and
have a "panel" property pointing to the panel to follow. More
flexibility and non-DT implementations could be added as needed.
Right now, panel followers can follow the prepare/unprepare functions.
There could be arguments made that, instead, they should follow
enable/disable. I've chosen prepare/unprepare for now since those
functions are guaranteed to power up/power down the panel and it seems
better to start the process earlier.
A bit of explaining about why this is a roll-your-own API instead of
using something more standard:
1. In standard APIs in Linux, parent devices are automatically powered
on when a child needs power. Applying that here, it would mean that
we'd force the panel on any time someone was listening to the
touchscreen. That, unfortunately, would have broken homestar's need
(if we hadn't changed the hardware, as per above) where the panel
absolutely needs to be able to power cycle itself. While one could
argue that homestar is broken hardware and we shouldn't have the
API do backflips for it, _officially_ the eDP timing guidelines
agree with homestar's needs and the panel power sequencing diagrams
show power going off. It's nice to be able to support this.
2. We could, conceibably, try to add a new flag to device_link causing
the parent to be in charge of power. Then we could at least use
normal pm_runtime APIs. This sounds great, except that we run into
problems with initial probe. As talked about in the later patch
("HID: i2c-hid: Support being a panel follower") the initial power
on of a panel follower might need to do things (like add
sub-devices) that aren't allowed in a runtime_resume function.
The above complexities explain why this API isn't using common
functions. That being said, this patch is very small and
self-contained, so if someone was later able to adapt it to using more
common APIs while solving the above issues then that could happen in
the future.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230519032316.3464732-1-yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230727101636.v4.3.Icd5f96342d2242051c754364f4bee13ef2b986d4@changeid
In a whole pile of panel drivers, we have code to make the
prepare/unprepare/enable/disable callbacks behave as no-ops if they've
already been called. It's silly to have this code duplicated
everywhere. Add it to the core instead so that we can eventually
delete it from all the drivers. Note: to get some idea of the
duplicated code, try:
git grep 'if.*>prepared' -- drivers/gpu/drm/panel
git grep 'if.*>enabled' -- drivers/gpu/drm/panel
NOTE: arguably, the right thing to do here is actually to skip this
patch and simply remove all the extra checks from the individual
drivers. Perhaps the checks were needed at some point in time in the
past but maybe they no longer are? Certainly as we continue
transitioning over to "panel_bridge" then we expect there to be much
less variety in how these calls are made. When we're called as part of
the bridge chain, things should be pretty simple. In fact, there was
some discussion in the past about these checks [1], including a
discussion about whether the checks were needed and whether the calls
ought to be refcounted. At the time, I decided not to mess with it
because it felt too risky.
Looking closer at it now, I'm fairly certain that nothing in the
existing codebase is expecting these calls to be refcounted. The only
real question is whether someone is already doing something to ensure
prepare()/unprepare() match and enabled()/disable() match. I would say
that, even if there is something else ensuring that things match,
there's enough complexity that adding an extra bool and an extra
double-check here is a good idea. Let's add a drm_warn() to let people
know that it's considered a minor error to take advantage of
drm_panel's double-checking but we'll still make things work fine.
We'll also add an entry to the official DRM todo list to remove the
now pointless check from the panels after this patch lands and,
eventually, fixup anyone who is triggering the new warning.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210416153909.v4.27.I502f2a92ddd36c3d28d014dd75e170c2d405a0a5@changeid
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230727101636.v4.2.I59b417d4c29151cc2eff053369ec4822b606f375@changeid
As talked about in the patch ("drm/panel: Add a way for other devices
to follow panel state"), touchscreens that are connected to panels are
generally expected to be power sequenced together with the panel
they're attached to. Today, nothing provides information allowing you
to find out that a touchscreen is connected to a panel. Let's add a
phandle for this.
The proerty is added to the generic touchscreen bindings and then
enabled in the bindings for the i2c-hid backed devices. This can and
should be added for other touchscreens in the future, but for now
let's start small.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230727101636.v4.1.Id68e30343bb1e11470582a9078b086176cfec46b@changeid
