We've converted this driver to using the new GPIO line value setters but
missed the instance where the legacy callback is accessed directly using
the function pointer. This will lead to a NULL-pointer dereference as
this pointer is no longer populated. Fix it.
Fixes: 0e1a8930c9 ("gpio: npcm-sgpio: use new GPIO line value setter callbacks")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250618-gpio-mmio-fix-setter-v1-1-2578ffb77019@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
On Microblaze platforms there is no need to handle clocks because the
system is starting with clocks enabled (can be described via fixed clock
node or clock-frequency property or not described at all).
With using soft IPs with SOC platforms there is mandatory to handle clocks
as is explained in commit 60dbdc6e08 ("dt-bindings: net: emaclite: Add
clock support").
That's why make clock as required in dt binding because it is present in
both configurations and should be described even there is no way how to
handle it on Microblaze systems.
There is also need to describe missing axi gpio clock in fpga-region.yaml
not to introduce new error when make dt_binding_check runs.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com> # fpga
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/94151cfbcff5e4ae05894981c7e398b605d4b00a.1750059796.git.michal.simek@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Currently for CONFIG_GPIO_GENERIC=y each struct gpio_chip object
contains the fields relevant only for gpio-mmio users. It's not an
insignificant number either as it's several pointers and integers.
It makes sense to remove these fields from struct gpio_chip into a
dedicated structure but this is not trivial due to how the bgpio_init()
function is implemented.
Add a task for tracking this rework.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250527111353.71540-1-brgl@bgdev.pl
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Pull timer cleanup from Thomas Gleixner:
"The delayed from_timer() API cleanup:
The renaming to the timer_*() namespace was delayed due massive
conflicts against Linux-next. Now that everything is upstream finish
the conversion"
* tag 'timers-cleanups-2025-06-08' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
treewide, timers: Rename from_timer() to timer_container_of()
Pull x86 fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
"A small set of x86 fixes:
- Cure IO bitmap inconsistencies
A failed fork cleans up all resources of the newly created thread
via exit_thread(). exit_thread() invokes io_bitmap_exit() which
does the IO bitmap cleanups, which unfortunately assume that the
cleanup is related to the current task, which is obviously bogus.
Make it work correctly
- A lockdep fix in the resctrl code removed the clearing of the
command buffer in two places, which keeps stale error messages
around. Bring them back.
- Remove unused trace events"
* tag 'x86-urgent-2025-06-08' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
fs/resctrl: Restore the rdt_last_cmd_clear() calls after acquiring rdtgroup_mutex
x86/iopl: Cure TIF_IO_BITMAP inconsistencies
x86/fpu: Remove unused trace events
Pull timer fix from Thomas Gleixner:
"Add the missing seq_file forward declaration in the timer namespace
header"
* tag 'timers-urgent-2025-06-08' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
timens: Add struct seq_file forward declaration
Add initial DMR support, which required smarter RAPL probe
Fix AMD MSR RAPL energy reporting
Add RAPL power limit configuration output
Minor fixes
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
For the RAPL package energy status counter, Intel and AMD share the same
perf_subsys and perf_name, but with different MSR addresses.
Both rapl_counter_arch_infos[0] and rapl_counter_arch_infos[1] are
introduced to describe this counter for different Vendors.
As a result, the perf counter is probed twice, and causes a failure in
in get_rapl_counters() because expected_read_size and actual_read_size
don't match.
Fix the problem by skipping the already probed counter.
Note, this is not a perfect fix. For example, if different
vendors/platforms use the same MSR value for different purpose, the code
can be fooled when it probes a rapl_counter_arch_infos[] entry that does
not belong to the running Vendor/Platform.
In a long run, better to put rapl_counter_arch_infos[] into the
platform_features so that this becomes Vendor/Platform specific.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
platform_features->rapl_msrs describes the RAPL MSRs supported. While
RAPL Perf counters can be exposed from different kernel backend drivers,
e.g. RAPL MSR I/F driver, or RAPL TPMI I/F driver.
Thus, turbostat should first blindly probe all the available RAPL Perf
counters, and falls back to the RAPL MSR counters if they are listed in
platform_features->rapl_msrs.
With this, platforms that don't have RAPL MSRs can clear the
platform_features->rapl_msrs bits and use RAPL Perf counters only.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Increase the code readability by moving the no_perf/no_msr flag and the
cai->perf_name/cai->msr sanity checks into the counter probe functions.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
probe_rapl_msr() is reused for probing RAPL MSR counters, cstate MSR
counters and MPERF/APERF/SMI MSR counters, thus its name is misleading.
Similar to add_perf_counter(), introduce add_msr_counter() to probe a
counter via MSR. Introduce wrapper function add_rapl_msr_counter() at
the same time to add extra check for Zero return value for specified
RAPL counters.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
As the only caller of add_msr_perf_counter_(), add_msr_perf_counter()
just gives extra debug output on top. There is no need to keep both
functions.
Remove add_msr_perf_counter_() and move all the logic to
add_msr_perf_counter().
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
As the only caller of add_cstate_perf_counter_(),
add_cstate_perf_counter() just gives extra debug output on top. There is
no need to keep both functions.
Remove add_cstate_perf_counter_() and move all the logic to
add_cstate_perf_counter().
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
As the only caller of add_rapl_perf_counter_(), add_rapl_perf_counter()
just gives extra debug output on top. There is no need to keep both
functions.
Remove add_rapl_perf_counter_() and move all the logic to
add_rapl_perf_counter().
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Quit early for unsupported RAPL counters.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
rapl_joules bit should always be checked even if
platform_features->rapl_msrs is not set or no_msr flag is used.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
