Rename the pin mux and gpio-hog node names to match up with binding
rules. This fixes dtbs_check warnings:
'gpmc0-pins-default' does not match any of the regexes: '-pins(-[0-9]+)?$|-pin$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
'gpio0-36' does not match '^(hog-[0-9]+|.+-hog(-[0-9]+)?)$'
While at it, change the phandle name to be consistent with the pinctrl
naming.
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240830113137.3986091-1-nm@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Add FSS regions at 0x50000000, 0x400000000, and 0x600000000. Although
not used currently by the Linux FSS driver, these regions belong to
the FSS and should be included in the ranges mapping.
While here, a couple of these numbers had missing zeros which was
hidden by odd alignments, fix both these issues.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240828172956.26630-5-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Add FSS regions at 0x50000000, 0x400000000, and 0x600000000. Although
not used currently by the Linux FSS driver, these regions belong to
the FSS and should be included in the ranges mapping.
While here, a couple of these numbers had missing zeros which was
hidden by odd alignments, fix both these issues.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240828172956.26630-4-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Add FSS regions at 0x50000000, 0x400000000, and 0x600000000. Although
not used currently by the Linux FSS driver, these regions belong to
the FSS and should be included in the ranges mapping.
While here, a couple of these numbers had missing zeros which was
hidden by odd alignments, fix both these issues.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240828172956.26630-3-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Add FSS regions at 0x50000000, 0x400000000, and 0x600000000. Although
not used currently by the Linux FSS driver, these regions belong to
the FSS and should be included in the ranges mapping.
While here, a couple of these numbers had missing zeros which was
hidden by odd alignments, fix both these issues.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240828172956.26630-2-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
This adds node for E5010 JPEG Encoder which is a stateful JPEG Encoder
present in AM62A SoC [1], supporting baseline encoding of semiplanar based
YUV420 and YUV422 raw video formats to JPEG encoding, with resolutions
supported from 64x64 to 8kx8k.
E5010 JPEG Encoder IP is present in main domain, so this also adds address
range for core and mmu regions of E5010 IP in cbass_main node.
Link: https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spruj16 [1]
Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826162250.380005-2-devarsht@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
CAN instances 0 and 1 in the mcu domain and 0 in the main domain are
brought on the evm through headers J5, J8 and J10 respectively. Thus,
add their respective transceiver's 0, 1 and 2 dt nodes as well as
add the required pinmux to add support for these CAN instances.
Signed-off-by: Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240827105644.575862-2-b-kapoor@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
wkup_uart0 is a reserved node that is used by Device Manager firmware.
Only TX and RX pins are required for the firmware and enabling pinctrl
for CTS and RTS breaks the wakeup functionality of wkup_uart0. Drop the
conflicting muxes.
Signed-off-by: Vibhore Vardhan <vibhore@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826-am62p-v1-1-b713b48628d1@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The remoteproc firmware like of R5F and DSPs in the MAIN voltage domain
use timers. Therefore, change the status of the timer nodes to
"reserved" to avoid any clash. Usage is described as below:
+===================+=============+
| Remoteproc node | Timer Node |
+===================+=============+
| main_r5fss0_core0 | main_timer2 |
+-------------------+-------------+
| main_r5fss0_core1 | main_timer3 |
+-------------------+-------------+
| main_r5fss1_core0 | main_timer4 |
+-------------------+-------------+
| main_r5fss1_core1 | main_timer5 |
+-------------------+-------------+
| c71_0 | main_timer0 |
+-------------------+-------------+
| c71_1 | main_timer1 |
+-------------------+-------------+
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826104821.1516344-6-b-padhi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The remoteproc firmware like of R5F and DSPs in the MAIN voltage domain
use timers. Therefore, change the status of the timer nodes to
"reserved" to avoid any clash. Usage is described as below:
+===================+=============+
| Remoteproc node | Timer Node |
+===================+=============+
| main_r5fss0_core0 | main_timer2 |
+-------------------+-------------+
| main_r5fss0_core1 | main_timer3 |
+-------------------+-------------+
| main_r5fss1_core0 | main_timer4 |
+-------------------+-------------+
| main_r5fss1_core1 | main_timer5 |
+-------------------+-------------+
| c71_0 | main_timer0 |
+-------------------+-------------+
| c71_1 | main_timer1 |
+-------------------+-------------+
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826104821.1516344-5-b-padhi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The remoteproc firmware like of R5F and DSPs in the MAIN voltage domain
use timers. Therefore, change the status of the timer nodes to
"reserved" to avoid any clash. Usage is described as below:
+===================+==============+
| Remoteproc node | Timer Node |
+===================+==============+
| main_r5fss0_core0 | main_timer12 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| main_r5fss0_core1 | main_timer13 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| main_r5fss1_core0 | main_timer14 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| main_r5fss1_core1 | main_timer15 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| c66_0 | main_timer0 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| c66_1 | main_timer1 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| c71_0 | main_timer2 |
+-------------------+--------------+
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826104821.1516344-4-b-padhi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The remoteproc firmware like of R5F and DSPs in the MAIN voltage domain
use timers. Therefore, change the status of the timer nodes to
"reserved" to avoid any clash. Usage is described as below:
+===================+==============+
| Remoteproc node | Timer Node |
+===================+==============+
| main_r5fss0_core0 | main_timer12 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| main_r5fss0_core1 | main_timer13 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| main_r5fss1_core0 | main_timer14 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| main_r5fss1_core1 | main_timer15 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| c66_0 | main_timer0 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| c66_1 | main_timer1 |
+-------------------+--------------+
| c71_0 | main_timer2 |
+-------------------+--------------+
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826104821.1516344-3-b-padhi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The remoteproc firmware of R5F in the MAIN voltage domain use timers.
Therefore, change the status of the timer nodes to "reserved" to avoid
any clash. Usage is described as below:
+===================+==========================+
| Remoteproc node | Timer Node |
+===================+==========================+
| main_r5fss0_core0 | main_timer0, main_timer2 |
+-------------------+--------------------------+
| main_r5fss0_core1 | main_timer1 |
+-------------------+--------------------------+
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826104821.1516344-2-b-padhi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The TI AM69 SK board has three R5F clusters in the MAIN domain, and all
of these are configured for LockStep mode at the moment. Switch all of
these R5F clusters to Split mode by default to maximize the number of
R5F cores.
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826093024.1183540-8-b-padhi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The TI J784S4 EVM board has three R5F clusters in the MAIN domain, and
all of these are configured for LockStep mode at the moment. Switch
all of these R5F clusters to Split mode by default to maximize the
number of R5F cores.
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826093024.1183540-7-b-padhi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The TI AM68 SK board has two R5F clusters in the MAIN domain, and both
of these are configured for LockStep mode at the moment. Switch both of
these R5F clusters to Split mode by default to maximize the number of
R5F cores.
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826093024.1183540-6-b-padhi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The TI J721S2 EVM board has two R5F clusters in the MAIN domain, and
both of these are configured for LockStep mode at the moment. Switch
both of these R5F clusters to Split mode by default to maximize the
number of R5F cores.
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826093024.1183540-5-b-padhi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The TI J721E SK board has two R5F clusters in the MAIN domain, and both
of these are configured for LockStep mode at the moment. Switch both of
these R5F clusters to Split mode by default to maximize the number of
R5F cores.
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826093024.1183540-4-b-padhi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The TI J721E EVM board has two R5F clusters in the MAIN domain, and
both of these are configured for LockStep mode at the moment. Switch
both of these R5F clusters to Split mode by default to maximize the
number of R5F cores.
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826093024.1183540-3-b-padhi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The TI J7200 EVM board has one R5F cluster in the MAIN domain, and it is
configured for LockStep mode at the moment. Switch the MAIN R5F cluster
to Split mode by default to maximize the number of R5F cores.
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826093024.1183540-2-b-padhi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
External interfaces should be disabled at the SoC DTSI level, since
the node is incomplete. Disable Ethernet switch and ports in SoC DTSI
and enable them in the board DTS. If the board DTS includes a SoM DTSI
that completes the node description, enable the Ethernet switch and
ports in SoM DTSI.
Reflect this change in SoM DTSIs by removing ethernet port disable.
Signed-off-by: Logan Bristol <logan.bristol@utexas.edu>
Acked-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
Acked-by: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240809135753.1186-1-logan.bristol@utexas.edu
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The DMA carveout for the C6x core 0 is at 0xa6000000 and core 1 is at
0xa7000000. These are reversed in DT. While both C6x can access either
region, so this is not normally a problem, but if we start restricting
the memory each core can access (such as with firewalls) the cores
accessing the regions for the wrong core will not work. Fix this here.
Fixes: fae14a1cb8 ("arm64: dts: ti: Add k3-j721e-beagleboneai64")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240801181232.55027-2-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The DMA carveout for the C6x core 0 is at 0xa6000000 and core 1 is at
0xa7000000. These are reversed in DT. While both C6x can access either
region, so this is not normally a problem, but if we start restricting
the memory each core can access (such as with firewalls) the cores
accessing the regions for the wrong core will not work. Fix this here.
Fixes: f46d16cf5b ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-sk: Add DDR carveout memory nodes")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240801181232.55027-1-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
The PCIe0 instance of the PCIe controller on J784S4 SoC supports up to 4
lanes. Additionally, all 4 lanes of PCIe0 can be utilized on J784S4-EVM
via SERDES1. Since SERDES1 is not being used by any peripheral apart
from PCIe0, use all 4 lanes of SERDES1 for PCIe0.
Fixes: 27ce26fe52 ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-evm: Enable PCIe0 and PCIe1 in RC Mode")
Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240720110455.3043327-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
There are 2 mux-controller nodes in J7200 which are responsible for
transferring can signals to the can phy but same node names for both
the mux-controllers led to errors while setting up both mux-controllers
for can phys simultaneously.
Thus, update node names for these mux-controller.
Fixes: da23e8d112 ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-som-p0: Add support for CAN instance 0 in main domain")
Signed-off-by: Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240729063411.1570930-3-b-kapoor@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
There are 2 mux-controller nodes in J721S2 which are responsible for
transferring can signals to the can phy but same node names for both
the mux-controllers led to errors while setting up both mux-controllers
for can phys simultaneously.
Thus, update node names for these mux-controller.
Fixes: 98f3b667e1 ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2: Add support for CAN instances 3 and 5 in main domain")
Signed-off-by: Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240729063411.1570930-2-b-kapoor@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Commit 5e5c50964e ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j722s: Add gpio-ranges
properties") introduced pinmux range definition for gpio-ranges, however
missed a hole within gpio-range for main_pmx0. As a result, automatic
mapping of GPIO to pin control for gpios within the main_pmx0 domain is
broken. Fix this by correcting the gpio-range.
Fixes: 5e5c50964e ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j722s: Add gpio-ranges properties")
Signed-off-by: Jared McArthur <j-mcarthur@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240801210414.715306-4-j-mcarthur@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Commit d72d73a44c ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p: Add gpio-ranges
properties") introduced pinmux range definition for gpio-ranges, however
missed a hole within gpio-range for main_pmx0. As a result, automatic
mapping of GPIO to pin control for gpios within the main_pmx0 domain is
broken. Fix this by correcting the gpio-range.
Fixes: d72d73a44c ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p: Add gpio-ranges properties")
Signed-off-by: Jared McArthur <j-mcarthur@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240801210414.715306-3-j-mcarthur@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Commit d72d73a44c ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p: Add gpio-ranges
properties") introduced pinmux range definition for gpio-ranges, however
missed introducing the range description for the mcu_gpio node. As a
result, automatic mapping of GPIO to pin control for mcu gpios is
broken. Fix this by introducing the proper ranges.
Fixes: d72d73a44c ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p: Add gpio-ranges properties")
Signed-off-by: Jared McArthur <j-mcarthur@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240801210414.715306-2-j-mcarthur@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
