Introduce folio_set_swap_entry() to abstract how both folio->private and
swp_entry_t work. Use swap_address_space() directly instead of
indirecting through folio_mapping(). Include an assertion that the old
folio is not large as we only allocate a single-page folio to replace it.
Use folio_put_refs() instead of calling folio_put() twice.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220902194653.1739778-9-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Some of the static checkers get confused by extracting the page from the
folio and referring to fields in the first tail page. Adding these fields
to struct folio lets us avoid doing that. It has the risk that people
will refer to those fields without checking that the folio is actually a
large folio, so prefix them with underscores and document the preferred
function to use instead.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220902194653.1739778-3-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "MM folio changes for 6.1", v2.
My focus this round has been on shmem. I believe it is now fully
converted to folios. Of course, shmem interacts with a lot of the swap
cache and other parts of the kernel, so there are patches all over the MM.
This patch series survives a round of xfstests on tmpfs, which is nice,
but hardly an exhaustive test. Hugh was nice enough to run a round of
tests on it and found a bug which is fixed in this edition.
This patch (of 57):
A lot of comments mention pages when they should say folios.
Fix them up.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fixups for mglru additions]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220902194653.1739778-1-willy@infradead.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220902194653.1739778-2-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "add common struct mm_slot and use it in THP and KSM", v2.
At present, both THP and KSM module have similar structures mm_slot for
organizing and recording the information required for scanning mm, and
each defines the following exactly the same operation functions:
- alloc_mm_slot
- free_mm_slot
- get_mm_slot
- insert_to_mm_slots_hash
In order to de-duplicate these codes, this patchset introduces a common
struct mm_slot, and lets THP and KSM to use it.
This patch (of 7):
At present, both THP and KSM module have similar structures mm_slot for
organizing and recording the information required for scanning mm, and
each defines the following exactly the same operation functions:
- alloc_mm_slot
- free_mm_slot
- get_mm_slot
- insert_to_mm_slots_hash
In order to de-duplicate these codes, this patch introduces a common
struct mm_slot, and subsequent patches will let THP and KSM to use it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220831031951.43152-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220831031951.43152-2-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "ksm: count allocated rmap_items and update documentation",
v5.
KSM can save memory by merging identical pages, but also can consume
additional memory, because it needs to generate rmap_items to save each
scanned page's brief rmap information.
To determine how beneficial the ksm-policy (like madvise), they are using
brings, so we add a new interface /proc/<pid>/ksm_stat for each process
The value "ksm_rmap_items" in it indicates the total allocated ksm
rmap_items of this process.
The detailed description can be seen in the following patches' commit
message.
This patch (of 2):
KSM can save memory by merging identical pages, but also can consume
additional memory, because it needs to generate rmap_items to save each
scanned page's brief rmap information. Some of these pages may be merged,
but some may not be abled to be merged after being checked several times,
which are unprofitable memory consumed.
The information about whether KSM save memory or consume memory in
system-wide range can be determined by the comprehensive calculation of
pages_sharing, pages_shared, pages_unshared and pages_volatile. A simple
approximate calculation:
profit =~ pages_sharing * sizeof(page) - (all_rmap_items) *
sizeof(rmap_item);
where all_rmap_items equals to the sum of pages_sharing, pages_shared,
pages_unshared and pages_volatile.
But we cannot calculate this kind of ksm profit inner single-process wide
because the information of ksm rmap_item's number of a process is lacked.
For user applications, if this kind of information could be obtained, it
helps upper users know how beneficial the ksm-policy (like madvise) they
are using brings, and then optimize their app code. For example, one
application madvise 1000 pages as MERGEABLE, while only a few pages are
really merged, then it's not cost-efficient.
So we add a new interface /proc/<pid>/ksm_stat for each process in which
the value of ksm_rmap_itmes is only shown now and so more values can be
added in future.
So similarly, we can calculate the ksm profit approximately for a single
process by:
profit =~ ksm_merging_pages * sizeof(page) - ksm_rmap_items *
sizeof(rmap_item);
where ksm_merging_pages is shown at /proc/<pid>/ksm_merging_pages, and
ksm_rmap_items is shown in /proc/<pid>/ksm_stat.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220830143731.299702-1-xu.xin16@zte.com.cn
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220830143838.299758-1-xu.xin16@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Xiaokai Ran <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: CGEL ZTE <cgel.zte@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
There seems to be no reason why FOLL_FORCE during GUP-fast would have to
fallback to the slow path when stumbling over a PROT_NONE mapped page. We
only have to trigger hinting faults in case FOLL_FORCE is not set, and any
kind of fault handling naturally happens from the slow path -- where NUMA
hinting accounting/handling would be performed.
Note that the comment regarding THP migration is outdated: commit
2b4847e730 ("mm: numa: serialise parallel get_user_page against THP
migration") described that this was required for THP due to lack of PMD
migration entries. Nowadays, we do have proper PMD migration entries in
place -- see set_pmd_migration_entry(), which does a proper
pmdp_invalidate() when placing the migration entry.
So let's just reuse gup_can_follow_protnone() here to make it consistent
and drop the somewhat outdated comments.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220825164659.89824-3-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
