The extern declarations should be in a header file that corresponds to
their definition, move these extern declarations to its header file.
Some of them have nowhere to go, so move them to hwif.h since they are
referenced in hwif.c only.
dwmac100_* dwmac1000_* dwmac4_* dwmac410_* dwmac510_* stay in hwif.h,
otherwise you will be flooded with name conflicts from dwmac100.h,
dwmac1000.h and dwmac4.h if hwif.c try to #include these .h files.
Compile tested only.
No functional change intended.
Suggested-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Furong Xu <0x1207@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241208070202.203931-1-0x1207@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Andrew Lunn says:
====================
dsa: mv88e6xxx: Refactor statistics ready for RMU support
Marvell Ethernet switches support sending commands to the switch
inside Ethernet frames, which the Remote Management Unit, RMU,
handles. One such command retries all the RMON statistics. The
switches however have other statistics which cannot be retried by this
bulk method, so need to be gathered individually.
This patch series refactors the existing statistics code into a
structure that will allow RMU integration in a future patchset.
There should be no functional change as a result of this refactoring.
====================
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241207-v6-13-rc1-net-next-mv88e6xxx-stats-refactor-v1-0-b9960f839846@lunn.ch
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The RGMII interface supports three data rates: 10/100 Mbps
and 1 Gbps. These speeds correspond to clock frequencies
of 2.5/25 MHz and 125 MHz, respectively.
Many Ethernet drivers, including glues in stmmac, follow
a similar pattern of converting RGMII speed to clock frequency.
To simplify code, define the helper rgmii_clock(speed)
to convert connection speed to clock frequency.
Suggested-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jan Petrous (OSS) <jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241205-upstream_s32cc_gmac-v8-4-ec1d180df815@oss.nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Petr Machata says:
====================
vxlan: Support user-defined reserved bits
Currently the VXLAN header validation works by vxlan_rcv() going feature
by feature, each feature clearing the bits that it consumes. If anything
is left unparsed at the end, the packet is rejected.
Unfortunately there are machines out there that send VXLAN packets with
reserved bits set, even if they are configured to not use the
corresponding features. One such report is here[1], and we have heard
similar complaints from our customers as well.
This patchset adds an attribute that makes it configurable which bits
the user wishes to tolerate and which they consider reserved. This was
recommended in [1] as well.
A knob like that inevitably allows users to set as reserved bits that
are in fact required for the features enabled by the netdevice, such as
GPE. This is detected, and such configurations are rejected.
In patches #1..#7, the reserved bits validation code is gradually moved
away from the unparsed approach described above, to one where a given
set of valid bits is precomputed and then the packet is validated
against that.
In patch #8, this precomputed set is made configurable through a new
attribute IFLA_VXLAN_RESERVED_BITS.
Patches #9 and #10 massage the testsuite a bit, so that patch #11 can
introduce a selftest for the resreved bits feature.
The corresponding iproute2 support is available in [2].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/db8b9e19-ad75-44d3-bfb2-46590d426ff5@proxmox.com/
[2] https://github.com/pmachata/iproute2/commits/vxlan_reserved_bits/
====================
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/cover.1733412063.git.petrm@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The set of bits that the VXLAN netdevice currently considers reserved is
defined by the features enabled at the netdevice construction. In order to
make this configurable, add an attribute, IFLA_VXLAN_RESERVED_BITS. The
payload is a pair of big-endian u32's covering the VXLAN header. This is
validated against the set of flags used by the various enabled VXLAN
features, and attempts to override bits used by an enabled feature are
bounced.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/c657275e5ceed301e62c69fe8e559e32909442e2.1733412063.git.petrm@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
In order to make it possible to configure which bits in VXLAN header should
be considered reserved, introduce a new field vxlan_config::reserved_bits.
Have it cover the whole header, except for the VNI-present bit and the bits
for VNI itself, and have individual enabled features clear more bits off
reserved_bits.
(This is expressed as first constructing a used_bits set, and then
inverting it to get the reserved_bits. The set of used_bits will be useful
on its own for validation of user-set reserved_bits in a following patch.)
The patch also moves a comment relevant to the validation from the unparsed
validation site up to the new site. Logically this patch should add the new
comment, and a later patch that removes the unparsed bits would remove the
old comment. But keeping both legs in the same patch is better from the
history spelunking point of view.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/984dbf98d5940d3900268dbffaf70961f731d4a4.1733412063.git.petrm@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The functions vxlan_remcsum() and vxlan_parse_gbp_hdr() take both the SKB
and the unparsed VXLAN header. Now that unparsed adjustment is handled
directly by vxlan_rcv(), drop this argument, and have the function derive
it from the SKB on its own.
vxlan_parse_gpe_proto() does not take SKB, so keep the header parameter.
However const it so that it's clear that the intention is that it does not
get changed.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5ea651f4e06485ba1a84a8eb556a457c39f0dfd4.1733412063.git.petrm@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
vxlan_sock.flags is constructed from vxlan_dev.cfg.flags, as the subset of
flags (named VXLAN_F_RCV_FLAGS) that is important from the point of view of
socket sharing. Attempts to reconfigure these flags during the vxlan netdev
lifetime are also bounced. It is therefore immaterial whether we access the
flags through the vxlan_dev or through the socket.
Convert the socket accesses to netdevice accesses in this separate patch to
make the conversions that take place in the following patches more obvious.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5d237ffd731055e524d7b7c436de43358d8743d2.1733412063.git.petrm@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
David Howells says:
====================
rxrpc: Implement jumbo DATA transmission and RACK-TLP
Here's a series of patches to implement two main features:
(1) The transmission of jumbo data packets whereby several DATA packets of
a particular size can be glued together into a single UDP packet,
allowing us to make use of larger MTU sizes. The basic jumbo
subpacket capacity is 1412 bytes (RXRPC_JUMBO_DATALEN) and, say, an
MTU of 8192 allows five of them to be transmitted as one.
An alternative (and possibly more efficient way) would be to
expand/shrink the capacity of each DATA packet to match the MTU and
thus save on header and tail-gap overhead, but the Rx protocol does
not provide a mechanism for splitting the data - especially as the
transported data is encrypted per-packet - and so UDP fragmentation
would be the only way to handle this.
In fact, in the future, AF_RXRPC also needs to look at shrinking the
packet size where the MTU is smaller - for instance in the case of
being carried by IPv6 over wifi where there isn't capacity for a 1412
byte capacity.
(2) RACK-TLP to manage packet loss and retransmission in conjunction with
the congestion control algorithm.
These allow for better data throughput and work towards being able to have
larger transmission windows.
To this end, the following changes are also made:
(1) Use a single large array of kvec structs for the I/O thread rather
than having one per transmission buffer. We need a much bigger
collection of kvecs for ping padding
(2) Implement path-MTU probing by sending padded PING ACK packets and
monitoring for PING RESPONSE ACKs. The pmtud value determined is used
to configure the construction of jumbo DATA packets.
(3) The transmission queue is changed from a linked list of transmission
buffer structs to a linked list of transmission-queue structs, each of
which points to either 32 or 64 transmission buffers (depending on cpu
word size) and various bits of metadata are concentrated in the queue
structs rather than the buffers to make better use of the cpu cache.
(4) SACK data is stored in the transmission-queue structures in batches of
32 or 64 making it faster to process rather than being spread amongst
all the individual packet buffers.
(5) Don't change the DF flag on the UDP socket unless we need to - and
basically only enable it for path-MTU probing.
There are also some additional bits:
(1) Fix the handling of connection aborts to poke the aborted connections.
(2) Don't set the MORE-PACKETS Rx header flag on the wire. No one
actually checks it and it is, in any case, generated inconsistently
between implementations.
(3) Request an ACK when, during call transmission, there's a stall in the
app generating the data to be transmitted.
(4) Fix attention starvation in the I/O thread by making sure we go
through all outstanding events rather than returning to the beginning
of the check cycle after any time we process an event.
(5) Don't use the skbuff timestamp in the calculation of timeouts and RTT
as we really should include local processing time in that too.
Further, getting receive skbuff timestamps may be expensive.
(6) Make RTT tracking per call with the saving of the value between calls,
even within the same connection channel. The initial call timeout
starts off large to allow the server time to set up its state before
the initial reply.
(7) Don't allocate txbuf structs for ACK packets, but rather use page
frags and MSG_SPLICE_PAGES.
(8) Use irq-disabling locks for interactions between app threads and I/O
threads so that the I/O thread doesn't get help up.
(9) Make rxrpc set the REQUEST-ACK flag on an outgoing packet when cwnd is
at RXRPC_MIN_CWND (currently 4), not at 2 which it can never reach.
(10) Add some tracing bits and pieces (including displaying the userStatus
field in an ACK header) and some more stats counters (including
different sizes of jumbo packets sent/received).
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240306000655.1100294-1-dhowells@redhat.com/ [1]
====================
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241204074710.990092-1-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
When an rxrpc call is in its transmission phase and is sending a lot of
packets, stalls occasionally occur that cause severe performance
degradation (eg. increasing the transmission time for a 256MiB payload from
0.7s to 2.5s over a 10G link).
rxrpc already implements TCP-style congestion control [RFC5681] and this
helps mitigate the effects, but occasionally we're missing a time event
that deals with a missing ACK, leading to a stall until the RTO expires.
Fix this by implementing RACK/TLP in rxrpc.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
rxrpc_prepare_data_subpacket() sets the REQUEST-ACK flag on the outgoing
DATA packet under a number of circumstances, including, theoretically, when
the cwnd is at minimum (or less). However, the minimum in this function is
hard-coded as 2, but the actual minimum is RXRPC_MIN_CWND (which is
currently 4) and so this never occurs.
Without this, we will miss the request of some ACKs, potentially leading to
a transmission stall until a timeout occurs on one side or the other that
leads to an ACK being generated.
Fix the function to use RXRPC_MIN_CWND rather than a hard-coded number.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Manage the determination of RTT on a per-call (ie. per-RPC op) basis rather
than on a per-peer basis, averaging across all calls going to that peer.
The problem is that the RTT measurements from the initial packets on a call
may be off because the server may do some setting up (such as getting a
lock on a file) before accepting the rest of the data in the RPC and,
further, the RTT may be affected by server-side file operations, for
instance if a large amount of data is being written or read.
Note: When handling the FS.StoreData-type RPCs, for example, the server
uses the userStatus field in the header of ACK packets as supplementary
flow control to aid in managing this. AF_RXRPC does not yet support this,
but it should be added.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Add an indicator to the rxrpc_tx_data tracepoint to indicate what triggered
the transmission of a particular packet. At this point, it's only normal
transmission and retransmission, plus the tracepoint is also used to record
loss injection, but in a future patch, TLP-induced (re-)transmission will
also be a thing.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Tidy up the ACK parsing in the following ways:
(1) Put the serial number of the ACK packet into the rxrpc_ack_summary
struct and access it from there whilst parsing an ACK.
(2) Be consistent about using "if (summary.acked_serial)" rather than "if
(summary.acked_serial != 0)".
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
