Samsung MIPI DSIM controller is common DSI IP that can be used in various
SoCs like Exynos, i.MX8M Mini/Nano.
In order to access this DSI controller between various platform SoCs,
the ideal way to incorporate this in the drm stack is via the drm bridge
driver.
We already have a consolidated code for supporting component and bridge
based DRM drivers, so keep the exynos component based code in existing
exynos_drm_dsi.c and move generic bridge code as part of samsung-dsim.c
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
IRQ handler for te-gpio seems to be common across DSIM host.
However, Exynos is handling this via CRTC drivers but there is no clear
evidence on how the same has been handled in i.MX8MM. Keeping the handler
as-it-is can be a viable option but adding DSIM bridge core in upcoming
patches is not possible to call Exynos CRTC handler as DSIM bridge has
to be common across DRM bridge core instead of platform specific DRM
drivers like Exynos here.
So, this patch handles the handler via platform host helper, so-that
handling platform specific hook across Exynos and generic can be
reasonable till it makes it generic across all platforms.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
DSI host registration, attach and detach operations are quite
different for the component and bridge-based DRM drivers.
Supporting generic bridge driver to use both component and bridge
based DRM drivers can be tricky and would require additional host
related operation hooks.
Add host operation hooks for registering and unregistering Exynos
and generic drivers, where Exynos hooks are used in existing Exynos
component based DRM drivers and generic hooks are used in i.MX8M
bridge based DRM drivers.
Add host attach and detach operation hooks for Exynos component
DRM drivers and those get invoked while DSI core host attach and
detach gets called.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Finding the right input bus format throughout the pipeline is hard
so add atomic_get_input_bus_fmts callback and initialize with the
proper input format from list of supported output formats.
This format can be used in pipeline for negotiating bus format between
the DSI-end of this bridge and the other component closer to pipeline
components.
List of Pixel formats are taken from,
AN13573 i.MX 8/RT MIPI DSI/CSI-2, Rev. 0, 21 March 2022
3.7.4 Pixel formats
Table 14. DSI pixel packing formats
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
LCDIF-DSIM glue logic inverts the HS/VS/DE signals and expecting
the i.MX8M Mini/Nano DSI host to add additional Data Enable signal
active low (DE_LOW). This makes the valid data transfer on each
horizontal line.
So, add additional bus flags DE_LOW setting via input_bus_flags
for i.MX8M Mini/Nano platforms.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Suggested-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Look like an explicit fixing up of mode_flags is required for DSIM IP
present in i.MX8M Mini/Nano SoCs.
At least the LCDIF + DSIM needs active low sync polarities in order
to correlate the correct sync flags of the surrounding components in
the chain to make sure the whole pipeline can work properly.
On the other hand the i.MX 8M Mini Applications Processor Reference Manual,
Rev. 3, 11/2020 says.
"13.6.3.5.2 RGB interface
Vsync, Hsync, and VDEN are active high signals."
i.MX 8M Mini Applications Processor Reference Manual Rev. 3, 11/2020
3.6.3.5.2 RGB interface
i.MX 8M Nano Applications Processor Reference Manual Rev. 2, 07/2022
13.6.2.7.2 RGB interface
both claim "Vsync, Hsync, and VDEN are active high signals.", the
LCDIF must generate inverted HS/VS/DE signals, i.e. active LOW.
No clear evidence about whether it can be documentation issues or
something, so added proper comments on the code.
Comments are suggested by Marek Vasut.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Host transfer() in the DSI master will invoke only when the DSI commands
are sent from DSI devices like DSI Panel or DSI bridges and this host
the transfer wouldn't invoke for I2C-based-DSI bridge drivers.
Handling DSI host initialization in transfer calls misses the controller
setup for I2C configured DSI bridges.
This patch updates the DSI host initialization by calling host to init
from bridge pre_enable as the bridge pre_enable API is invoked by core
as it is common across all classes of DSI device drivers.
The host init during pre_enable is conditional and not invoked for Exynos
as existing downstream drm panels and bridges in Exynos are expecting
the host initialization during DSI transfer.
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Samsung MIPI DSIM controller is common DSI IP that can be used
in various SoCs like Exynos, i.MX8M Mini/Nano/Plus.
Add hw_type enum via platform_data so that accessing the different
controller data between various platforms becomes easy and meaningful.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Suggested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The same Samsung MIPI DSIM master can also be used in NXP's
i.MX8M Mini/Nano/Plus SoC.
In i.MX8M Mini/Nano/Plus SoC the DSI Phy requires a MIPI DPHY
bit to reset in order to activate the PHY and that can be done
via upstream i.MX8M blk-ctrl driver.
So, mark the phy get as optional.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
In general, for MIPI DSI there are three ways to represent the
pipeline for an upstream bridge to find the connected downstream
panel or bridge.
1. Child panel or bridge as a conventional device tree child node.
2. Child panel or bridge as an OF-graph port node.
3. Child panel or bridge as an OF-graph ports node.
There are three different downstream panels or bridges that are
possible to connect an upstream DSI host bridge - DSI Panel,
DSI Bridge, and I2C-Configured DSI bridge.
An example of the downstream panel represented as a child node,
&dsi {
compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-mipi-dsi";
ports {
port@0 {
reg = <0>;
dsi_to_mic: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&mic_to_dsi>;
};
};
};
panel@0 {
reg = <0>;
};
};
An example of the downstream bridge represented as a port node,
&i2c4 {
bridge@2c {
compatible = "ti,sn65dsi84";
ports {
port@0 {
reg = <0>;
bridge_in_dsi: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&dsi_out_bridge>;
data-lanes = <1 2>;
};
};
port@2 {
reg = <2>;
bridge_out_panel: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&panel_out_bridge>;
};
};
};
};
};
&dsi {
compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-mipi-dsim";
port {
dsi_in_lcdif: endpoint@0 {
reg = <0>;
remote-endpoint = <&lcdif_out_dsi>;
};
dsi_out_bridge: endpoint@1 {
reg = <1>;
remote-endpoint = <&bridge_in_dsi>;
};
};
};
An example of the downstream bridge represented as a ports node,
&dsi {
compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-mipi-dsim";
ports {
port@0 {
reg = <0>;
dsi_in_lcdif: endpoint@0 {
reg = <0>;
remote-endpoint = <&lcdif_out_dsi>;
};
};
port@1 {
reg = <1>;
dsi_out_bridge: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&bridge_in_dsi>;
};
};
};
In, summary it is possible to represent all three downstream slaves
devices using OF-graph port or ports node however only DSI Panel and
DSI Bridge are possible but not possible to represent I2C-Configured
DSI bridge child nodes since I2C-Configure bridges are child of I2C
node, not upstream DSI host bridge and it is must represent them
endpoint port linking.
This indeed means, the OF-graph port or ports representation is
mandatory for I2C-Configured DSI bridges.
This patch tries to add an OF-graph port or ports representation
detection code on top of existing child node detection.
It is possible to replace the entire detection code using existing
drm_of helper drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge but it will break the
Exynos DSI since the pipeline doesn't support OF-graph port or ports
node.
Overall, this patch has a combination of child and OF-graph pipeline
detections in order to support the backward compatibility of Exynos
DSI child node and i.MX8M Mini/Nano/Plus OF-graph port or ports
node pipelines.
This is the first common DSI host bridge driver that needs to support
all possible downstream connection pipeline combinations.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Exynos DSI already converted into a bridge driver, so bridge
detach will suppose happened during bridge chain removal done
by the bridge core.
Drop the explicit call chain to detach the bridge.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
A kzalloc()+memcpy() can be optimized in a single kmemdup().
This saves a few cycles because some memory doesn't need to be zeroed.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Compiling AMD GPU drivers displays two warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c:738: warning: Function parameter or member 'file' not described in 'drm_sched_job_add_syncobj_dependency'
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c:738: warning: Excess function
parameter 'file_private' description in
'drm_sched_job_add_syncobj_dependency'
Get rid of them by renaming the variable name on the function description
Signed-off-by: Caio Novais <caionovais@usp.br>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230325131532.6356-1-caionovais@usp.br
Reviewed-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
Currently i915_gem_object_is_framebuffer() doesn't treat the
BO containing the framebuffer's DPT as a framebuffer itself.
This means eg. that the shrinker can evict the DPT BO while
leaving the actual FB BO bound, when the DPT is allocated
from regular shmem.
That causes an immediate oops during hibernate as we
try to rewrite the PTEs inside the already evicted
DPT obj.
TODO: presumably this might also be the reason for the
DPT related display faults under heavy memory pressure,
but I'm still not sure how that would happen as the object
should be pinned by intel_dpt_pin() while in active use by
the display engine...
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Fixes: 0dc987b699 ("drm/i915/display: Add smem fallback allocation for dpt")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230320090522.9909-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 779cb5ba64)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Keeping DC states enabled is incompatible with the _noarm()/_arm()
split we use for writing pipe/plane registers. When DC5 and PSR
are enabled, all pipe/plane registers effectively become self-arming
on account of DC5 exit arming the update, and PSR exit latching it.
What probably saves us most of the time is that (with PIPE_MISC[21]=0)
all pipe register writes themselves trigger PSR exit, and then
we don't re-enter PSR until the idle frame count has elapsed.
So it may be that the PSR exit happens already before we've
updated the state too much.
Also the PSR1 panel (at least on this KBL) seems to discard the first
frame we trasmit, presumably still scanning out from its internal
framebuffer at that point. So only the second frame we transmit is
actually visible. But I suppose that could also be panel specific
behaviour. I haven't checked out how other PSR panels behave, nor
did I bother to check what the eDP spec has to say about this.
And since this really is all about DC states, let's switch from
the MODESET domain to the DC_OFF domain. Functionally they are
100% identical. We should probably remove the MODESET domain...
And for good measure let's toss in an assert to the place where
we do the _noarm() register writes to make sure DC states are
in fact off.
v2: Just use intel_display_power_is_enabled() (Imre)
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #v5.17+
Cc: Manasi Navare <navaremanasi@google.com>
Cc: Drew Davenport <ddavenport@chromium.org>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Fixes: d13dde4495 ("drm/i915: Split pipe+output CSC programming to noarm+arm pair")
Fixes: f8a005eb89 ("drm/i915: Optimize icl+ universal plane programming")
Fixes: 890b6ec4a5 ("drm/i915: Split skl+ plane update into noarm+arm pair")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230320183532.17727-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 41b4c7fe72)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
SKL/GLK CSC unit suffers from a nasty issue where a CSC
coeff/offset register read or write between DC5 exit and
PSR exit will undo the CSC arming performed by DMC, and
then during PSR exit the hardware will latch zeroes into
the active CSC registers. This causes any plane going
through the CSC to output all black.
We can sidestep the issue by making sure the PSR exit has
already actually happened before we touch the CSC coeff/offset
registers. Easiest way to guarantee that is to just move the
CSC programming back into the .color_commir_arm() as we force
a PSR exit (and crucially wait for it to actually happen)
prior to touching the arming registers.
When PSR (and thus also DC states) are disabled we don't
have anything to worry about, so we can keep using the
more optional _noarm() hook for writing the CSC registers.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #v5.19+
Cc: Manasi Navare <navaremanasi@google.com>
Cc: Drew Davenport <ddavenport@chromium.org>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8283
Fixes: d13dde4495 ("drm/i915: Split pipe+output CSC programming to noarm+arm pair")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230320095438.17328-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 80a892a4c2)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Expose intel_rps_read_actual_frequency_fw to read the actual freq without
taking forcewake for use by PMU. The code is refactored to use a common set
of functions across sysfs and PMU. Using common functions with sysfs in PMU
solves the issues of missing support for MTL and missing support for older
generations (prior to Gen6). It also future proofs the PMU where sometimes
code has been updated for sysfs and PMU has been missed.
v2: Remove runtime_pm_if_in_use from read_actual_frequency_fw (Tvrtko)
v3: (Tvrtko)
- Remove goto in __read_cagf
- Unexport intel_rps_get_cagf and intel_rps_read_punit_req
Fixes: 22009b6dad ("drm/i915/mtl: Modify CAGF functions for MTL")
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8280
Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230316004800.2539753-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 44df42e661)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Now that everything that controls which LRU an obj lives in *except* the
backing pages is protected by the LRU lock, add a special path to unpin
in the job_run() path, where we are assured that we already have backing
pages and will not be racing against eviction (because the GEM object's
dma_resv contains the fence that will be signaled when the submit/job
completes).
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/527845/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230320144356.803762-10-robdclark@gmail.com
Since the LRU lock is already acquired when moving an obj between LRUs,
we can use it to protect pin_count and madv, without any significant
change in locking (ie. it just expands the scope of the lock by a hand-
ful of instructions). This prepares the way to decrement the pin_count
in the job_run() path without needing to hold the obj lock, to avoid a
potential deadlock (or rather stall) caused by the fence-signaling path
(job_run()) blocking on shrinker/reclaim. (Only a stall because the
wait for fence signaling wait_for_idle() is not infinite.)
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/527843/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230320144356.803762-9-robdclark@gmail.com
The flags are only accessed (1) when submit is constructed, before
enqueuing to gpu sched (ie. when still visible to only the task calling
the submit ioctl), (2) here, where we own a reference to the submit and
are serialized on the gpu sched thread, and (3) after the submit is
retired and last reference is dropped, which is serialized on the
submit's reference count. Hence locking is unneeded here.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/527830/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230320144356.803762-3-robdclark@gmail.com
