The pcm_id value is __le32 so convert it before passing to the dev_dbg
function to be printed. Also fixup some other uses of __le32 data and
a couple of places where %u should have been used instead of %d
Picked up by sparse prototype for variadic and printf
function checking. Fixes a large number of sparse warnings, such as:
sound/soc/sof/pcm.c:84:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types)
sound/soc/sof/pcm.c:84:25: expected unsigned int
sound/soc/sof/pcm.c:84:25: got restricted __le32 [usertype] pcm_id
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260324133403.107708-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The logic around the reset control is weird. The driver already has
quirks describing which compatible strings require a reset control, but
the reset control is acquired using the "optional" API. Then any errors
other than deferred probe are ignored.
Instead, switch to the non-optional variant. Also use the deassered
variant to simplify the code. This also fixes a missing reset assert
upon removal.
Last, clean up the error message printing with dev_err_probe().
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260323172450.1259111-1-wens@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
A number of dev_dbg() and dev_err() calls get passed values that are
of __le32 type which does not get noticed by sparse until my variadic
checking patches.
There are a number of these, and we should probably fix these up.
The sparse warnings are numerous so the first few are listed here that
this patch fixes:
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types)
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: expected int
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: got restricted __le32 [usertype] get
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 5 (different base types)
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: expected int
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: got restricted __le32 [usertype] put
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 6 (different base types)
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: expected int
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: got restricted __le32 [usertype] info
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types)
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: expected int
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: got restricted __le32 [usertype] get
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 5 (different base types)
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: expected int
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: got restricted __le32 [usertype] put
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 6 (different base types)
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: expected int
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: got restricted __le32 [usertype] info
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types)
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: expected int
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: got restricted __le32 [usertype] get
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 5 (different base types)
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: expected int
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: got restricted __le32 [usertype] put
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 6 (different base types)
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: expected int
sound/soc/soc-topology.c:226:9: got restricted __le32 [usertype] info
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260323175604.19315-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The function soc_bind_dai_link() was first merged into
snd_soc_add_dai_link() by commit 63dc47da1f ("ASoC: soc-core: merge
snd_soc_add_dai_link() and soc_bind_dai_link()"), and later renamed to
snd_soc_add_pcm_runtime() by commit 0c04800424 ("ASoC: soc-core:
rename snd_soc_add_dai_link() to snd_soc_add_pcm_runtime()").
In simple-card.c, also adjust the wording since snd_soc_add_pcm_runtime()
no longer uses "xxx_of_node" fields but matches components by of_node
through snd_soc_find_dai() and snd_soc_is_matching_component().
In simple-card-utils.c, simply update the function name to its
successor snd_soc_add_pcm_runtime().
Assisted-by: unnamed:deepseek-v3.2 coccinelle
Signed-off-by: Kexin Sun <kexinsun@smail.nju.edu.cn>
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260321115018.9481-1-kexinsun@smail.nju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The addition of the kunit test made it possible to enable the WM_ADSP
driver even when there are no users. However, an unintended side-effect
was that it is also possible to turn it off when it is actually required,
leading to build failures:
ERROR: modpost: "wm_halo_init" [sound/soc/codecs/snd-soc-cs35l45.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "wm_adsp2_remove" [sound/soc/codecs/snd-soc-cs35l45.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "wm_adsp_hibernate" [sound/soc/codecs/snd-soc-cs35l45.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "wm_adsp2_component_probe" [sound/soc/codecs/snd-soc-cs35l45.ko] undefined!
Reverse the logic to replace the ununual list of 'default y if ....' with
the regular 'select' that do the same thing but prevent it from being
disabled if that would break the build.
Fixes: bf2d44d07d ("ASoC: wm_adsp: Add kunit test for firmware file search")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260320151752.3439218-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> says:
component has component->val_bytes which is set via
snd_soc_component_setup_regmap(). But it can be calculated via
component->regmap. No need to keep it as component->val_bytes.
This patchset adds new snd_soc_component_regmap_val_bytes(),
and remove component->val_bytes / snd_soc_component_setup_regmap().
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87a4wdzyxf.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Several of the wm_adsp kunit tests failed by only on arm64. This
turns out to be passing things to release_firmware which were not
allocated with request_firmware. This does actually drop some
errors on other platforms but somehow doesn't cause the tests to
fail, and kunit hides a lot of the output for passing tests.
There is a comment in the code regarding this exact thing in
wm_adsp_fw_find_test_case_exit(), but then it goes on and
does it anyway. I suspect maybe there was a plan to override
wm_adsp_release_firmware_files() that got forgotten, as the
function appears to have hooks for kunit that aren't used. Anyway
for now implement a simple fix of freeing the filenames
locally. It is likely a more detailed fix will be implemented in
the near future but this should get things moving again.
Fixes: bf2d44d07d ("ASoC: wm_adsp: Add kunit test for firmware file search")
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260318103813.249190-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Previously, this driver only advertised support for 48 kHz and
96 kHz sample rates, as there was no PLL configuration data
specified for any other sample rate/BCLK.
The CS42L84 is an Apple-specific variant of CS42L42. The PLL
configuration parameters for a variety of common BCLKs are
available in the latter's datasheet. What happens if we just
use those? As it turns out, they work just fine.
Fill out more PLL config parameters in the PLL config lookup
table, and advertise the corresponding sample rates to userspace.
This enables 44.1, 88.2, 176.4 and 192 kHz output and input.
Signed-off-by: James Calligeros <jcalligeros99@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260314-cs42l84-rates-v2-1-ea8a5af52542@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> says:
Normally the SDCA jack detection controls will be named after the GE
widget that represents the grouping of everything in the topology
controlled by the jack selection. However, in the case that the jack
selection only controls a single widget the control will be named after
the SU widget that implements that. It is rather confusing to have the
jack detection controls change naming scheme between devices. Add a new
widget type, similar to mixer widgets, to force use of the control name
rather than falling back to the widget names.
Most of the time a GE Entity will control many SU Entities and thus the
generated control will use the control name, since the control is
shared. However, in rare cases the GE Entity will only control a single
SU Entity. In this case the control is only linked to a single SU widget
and will thus inherit the name from that. This leads to the naming for
the Selected Mode control to be unpredictable. Update to use the new
named control muxes to always force the use of the control name.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260303155308.138989-3-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The WCD934x audio outputs (earpiece, headphone, speaker) share two power
supply converters, a buck and a flyback, managed by reference counters
(buck_users, flyback_users) in the Class-H controller.
The early return in wcd_clsh_ctrl_set_state() when nstate == ctrl->state
prevented _wcd_clsh_ctrl_set_state() from being called when switching
between outputs sharing the same state value. As a result, the buck and
flyback reference counters were never decremented on disable, leaving the
converters active and their counters out of sync with the actual hardware
state.
This caused audible distortion on the earpiece output and spurious MBHC
over-current protection interrupts on HPHL/HPHR during output switching.
Remove the early return so that CLSH_REQ_ENABLE and CLSH_REQ_DISABLE are
always dispatched, keeping the buck and flyback reference counters
consistent on every state transition.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Bellegarde <cedric.bellegarde@adishatz.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260304141006.280894-1-cedric.bellegarde@adishatz.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> says:
The index could change if any endpoint is not present. Remove the index
and let the machine driver get the right codec name from the registered
components.
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> says:
Because old pcm_new()/pcm_free() didn't care about parameter component,
to avoid name collisions, we have added pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() by
commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcm_destruct")
Because all driver switch to new pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct(), old
pcm_new()/pcm_free() were remoted by commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC:
soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
But naming of pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() are not goot. re-add
pcm_new()/pcm_free(), and switch to use it, again.
Because it has no functional significance, 1 patch is for 1 vender.
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/877brcjyoh.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/878qbsjyon.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87a4w8jyot.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87bjgojyoy.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87cy14jyp4.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87eclkjyp9.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87fr60jypf.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87h5qgjypk.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87ikawjypq.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87jyvcjypw.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87ldfsjyq1.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87ms08jyq8.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87o6kojyqf.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87pl54jyqm.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87qzpkjyqt.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87sea0jyr1.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87tsugjyr8.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87v7ewjyrf.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87wlzcjyrn.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87y0jsjyrw.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87zf48jys3.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/871phkldcq.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/873420ldcy.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/874imgldd6.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to
pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1].
pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still
using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free()
again.
[1] commit c64bfc9066 ("ASoC: soc-core: add new pcm_construct/pcmdestruct")
[2] commit e9067bb502 ("ASoC: soc-component: remove snd_pcm_ops from component driver")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/875x6wldde.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
