Finding panel_or_bridge might vary based on associated
DSI devices like DSI panel, bridge, and I2C based DSI
bridge.
1. DSI panels and bridges will invoke the host attach
from probe in order to find the panel_or_bridge.
chipone_probe()
dw_mipi_dsi_host_attach().start
dw_mipi_dsi_panel_or_bridge()
...found the panel_or_bridge...
ltdc_encoder_init().start
dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_attach().start
dw_mipi_dsi_host_attach().start
chipone_attach(). start
chipone_attach(). done
dw_mipi_dsi_host_attach().done
dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_attach(). done
ltdc_encoder_init().done
2. I2C based DSI bridge will invoke the drm_bridge_attach
from bridge attach in order to find the panel_or_bridge.
ltdc_encoder_init().start
dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_attach().start
dw_mipi_dsi_panel_or_bridge()
...found the panel_or_bridge...
dw_mipi_dsi_host_attach().start
sn65dsi83_attach(). start
sn65dsi83_attach(). done
dw_mipi_dsi_host_attach().done
dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_attach(). done
ltdc_encoder_init().done
So, invoke the panel_or_bridge from host attach and
bridge attach in order to find all possible DSI devices.
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Tested-by: Yannick Fertre <yannick.fertre@foss.st.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210704140309.268469-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com
SoCs like the rk3288 and rk3399 have 3 mipi dphys on them. One is TX-
only, one is RX-only and one can be configured to do either TX or RX.
The RX phy is statically connected to the first Image Signal Processor,
the TX phy is statically connected to the first DSI controller and
the TXRX phy is connected to both the second DSI controller as well
as the second ISP.
The RX dphy is controlled externally through registers in the "General
Register Files", while the other two are controlled through the
"Configuration and Test Interface" inside their DSI controller's
io-memory area.
The Rockchip dw-dsi controller already controls these dphys for the
TX case in the driver, but when we want to also allow configuration
for RX to the ISP from the media subsystem we need to expose phy-
functionality instead.
So add a bit of infrastructure to allow the dsi driver to work as a
phy and make sure it can be only one or the other at a time.
Similarly as the dsi-controller will be part of the drm-graph when
active, add an empty component to the drm-graph when in phy-mode
to make the rest of the drm-graph not wait for it.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
Tested-by: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@posteo.net>
Acked-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@collabora.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210210111020.2476369-4-heiko@sntech.de
Drop the DRM IRQ midlayer in favor of Linux IRQ interfaces. DRM's
IRQ helpers are mostly useful for UMS drivers. Modern KMS drivers
don't benefit from using it.
v3:
* return error if (ret < 0) (Geert)
* remove duplicate error message (Geert)
v2:
* handle errors in platform_get_irq() (Geert, Sergei)
* store IRQ number in struct shmob_drm_device (Laurent)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210720080941.23646-1-tzimmermann@suse.de
Replace dma_buf_begin_cpu_access() with drm_gem_fb_begin_cpu_access();
same for _end_cpu_access(). Remove some boiler-plate code. No functional
changes.
There's one left-over reference to the imported attachment that we
keep. GEM BOs with imported attachment are considered uncached and
enables special handling within the drm_fb_swab().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@tronnes.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210716140801.1215-4-tzimmermann@suse.de
Implement helpers drm_gem_fb_begin_cpu_access() and _end_cpu_access(),
which call the rsp dma-buf functions for all GEM BOs of the given
framebuffer.
Calls to dma_buf_end_cpu_access() can return an error code on failure,
while drm_gem_fb_end_cpu_access() does not. The latter runs during DRM's
atomic commit or during cleanup. Both cases don't allow for errors, so
leave out the return value.
v2:
* fix typo in docs (Daniel)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@tronnes.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210716140801.1215-2-tzimmermann@suse.de
The register_gop_device() function registers an "efi-framebuffer" platform
device to match against the efifb driver, to have an early framebuffer for
EFI platforms.
But there is already support to do exactly the same by the Generic System
Framebuffers (sysfb) driver. This used to be only for X86 but it has been
moved to drivers/firmware and could be reused by other architectures.
Also, besides supporting registering an "efi-framebuffer", this driver can
register a "simple-framebuffer" allowing to use the siple{fb,drm} drivers
on non-X86 EFI platforms. For example, on aarch64 these drivers can only
be used with DT and doesn't have code to register a "simple-frambuffer"
platform device when booting with EFI.
For these reasons, let's remove the register_gop_device() duplicated code
and instead move the platform specific logic that's there to sysfb driver.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625131359.1804394-1-javierm@redhat.com
The x86 architecture has generic support to register a system framebuffer
platform device. It either registers a "simple-framebuffer" if the config
option CONFIG_X86_SYSFB is enabled, or a legacy VGA/VBE/EFI FB device.
But the code is generic enough to be reused by other architectures and can
be moved out of the arch/x86 directory.
This will allow to also support the simple{fb,drm} drivers on non-x86 EFI
platforms, such as aarch64 where these drivers are only supported with DT.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625130947.1803678-2-javierm@redhat.com
The V3D engine has several hardware performance counters that can of
interest for userspace performance analysis tools.
This exposes new ioctls to create and destroy performance monitor
objects, as well as to query the counter values.
Each created performance monitor object has an ID that can be attached
to CL/CSD submissions, so the driver enables the requested counters when
the job is submitted, and updates the performance monitor values when
the job is done.
It is up to the user to ensure all the jobs have been finished before
getting the performance monitor values. It is also up to the user to
properly synchronize BCL jobs when submitting jobs with different
performance monitors attached.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Emma Anholt <emma@anholt.net>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Juan A. Suarez Romero <jasuarez@igalia.com>
Acked-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <melissa.srw@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608111541.461991-1-jasuarez@igalia.com
drm_file->master pointers should be protected by
drm_device.master_mutex or drm_file.master_lookup_lock when being
dereferenced.
However, in drm_lease.c, there are multiple instances where
drm_file->master is accessed and dereferenced while neither lock is
held. This makes drm_lease.c vulnerable to use-after-free bugs.
We address this issue in 2 ways:
1. Add a new drm_file_get_master() function that calls drm_master_get
on drm_file->master while holding on to
drm_file.master_lookup_lock. Since drm_master_get increments the
reference count of master, this prevents master from being freed until
we unreference it with drm_master_put.
2. In each case where drm_file->master is directly accessed and
eventually dereferenced in drm_lease.c, we wrap the access in a call
to the new drm_file_get_master function, then unreference the master
pointer once we are done using it.
Reported-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210712043508.11584-6-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com
Currently, drm_file.master pointers should be protected by
drm_device.master_mutex when being dereferenced. This is because
drm_file.master is not invariant for the lifetime of drm_file. If
drm_file is not the creator of master, then drm_file.is_master is
false, and a call to drm_setmaster_ioctl will invoke
drm_new_set_master, which then allocates a new master for drm_file and
puts the old master.
Thus, without holding drm_device.master_mutex, the old value of
drm_file.master could be freed while it is being used by another
concurrent process.
However, it is not always possible to lock drm_device.master_mutex to
dereference drm_file.master. Through the fbdev emulation code, this
might occur in a deep nest of other locks. But drm_device.master_mutex
is also the outermost lock in the nesting hierarchy, so this leads to
potential deadlocks.
To address this, we introduce a new spin lock at the bottom of the
lock hierarchy that only serializes drm_file.master. With this change,
the value of drm_file.master changes only when both
drm_device.master_mutex and drm_file.master_lookup_lock are
held. Hence, any process holding either of those locks can ensure that
the value of drm_file.master will not change concurrently.
Since no lock depends on the new drm_file.master_lookup_lock, when
drm_file.master is dereferenced, but drm_device.master_mutex cannot be
held, we can safely protect the master pointer with
drm_file.master_lookup_lock.
Reported-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210712043508.11584-5-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com
While checking the master status of the DRM file in
drm_is_current_master(), the device's master mutex should be
held. Without the mutex, the pointer fpriv->master may be freed
concurrently by another process calling drm_setmaster_ioctl(). This
could lead to use-after-free errors when the pointer is subsequently
dereferenced in drm_lease_owner().
The callers of drm_is_current_master() from drm_auth.c hold the
device's master mutex, but external callers do not. Hence, we implement
drm_is_current_master_locked() to be used within drm_auth.c, and
modify drm_is_current_master() to grab the device's master mutex
before checking the master status.
Reported-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210712043508.11584-4-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com
Inside drm_clients_info, the rcu_read_lock is held to lock
pid_task()->comm. However, within this protected section, a call to
drm_is_current_master is made, which involves a mutex lock in a future
patch. However, this is illegal because the mutex lock might block
while in the RCU read-side critical section.
Since drm_is_current_master isn't protected by rcu_read_lock, we avoid
this by moving it out of the RCU critical section.
The following report came from intel-gfx ci's
igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries testcase:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
5.13.0-CI-Patchwork_20515+ #1 Tainted: G W
-----------------------------
debugfs_test/1101 is trying to lock:
ffff888132d901a8 (&dev->master_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
drm_is_current_master+0x1e/0x50
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
3 locks held by debugfs_test/1101:
#0: ffff88810fdffc90 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
seq_read_iter+0x53/0x3b0
#1: ffff888132d90240 (&dev->filelist_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
drm_clients_info+0x63/0x2a0
#2: ffffffff82734220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at:
drm_clients_info+0x1b1/0x2a0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 8 PID: 1101 Comm: debugfs_test Tainted: G W
5.13.0-CI-Patchwork_20515+ #1
Hardware name: Intel Corporation CometLake Client Platform/CometLake S
UDIMM (ERB/CRB), BIOS CMLSFWR1.R00.1263.D00.1906260926 06/26/2019
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x7f/0xad
__lock_acquire.cold.78+0x2af/0x2ca
lock_acquire+0xd3/0x300
? drm_is_current_master+0x1e/0x50
? __mutex_lock+0x76/0x970
? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xbf/0x130
__mutex_lock+0xab/0x970
? drm_is_current_master+0x1e/0x50
? drm_is_current_master+0x1e/0x50
? drm_is_current_master+0x1e/0x50
drm_is_current_master+0x1e/0x50
drm_clients_info+0x107/0x2a0
seq_read_iter+0x178/0x3b0
seq_read+0x104/0x150
full_proxy_read+0x4e/0x80
vfs_read+0xa5/0x1b0
ksys_read+0x5a/0xd0
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210712043508.11584-3-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com
In preparation for a future patch to take a lock on
drm_device.master_mutex inside drm_is_current_master(), we first move
the call to drm_is_current_master() in drm_mode_getconnector out from the
section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex. This avoids creating a
circular lock dependency.
Failing to avoid this lock dependency produces the following lockdep
splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.13.0-rc7-CI-CI_DRM_10254+ #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kms_frontbuffer/1087 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88810dcd01a8 (&dev->master_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_is_current_master+0x1b/0x40
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88810dcd0488 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_mode_getconnector+0x1c6/0x4a0
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0xab/0x970
drm_client_modeset_probe+0x22e/0xca0
__drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x42/0x540
intel_fbdev_initial_config+0xf/0x20 [i915]
async_run_entry_fn+0x28/0x130
process_one_work+0x26d/0x5c0
worker_thread+0x37/0x380
kthread+0x144/0x170
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (&client->modeset_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0xab/0x970
drm_client_modeset_commit_locked+0x1c/0x180
drm_client_modeset_commit+0x1c/0x40
__drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x88/0xb0
drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x34/0x40
intel_fbdev_set_par+0x11/0x40 [i915]
fbcon_init+0x270/0x4f0
visual_init+0xc6/0x130
do_bind_con_driver+0x1e5/0x2d0
do_take_over_console+0x10e/0x180
do_fbcon_takeover+0x53/0xb0
register_framebuffer+0x22d/0x310
__drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x36c/0x540
intel_fbdev_initial_config+0xf/0x20 [i915]
async_run_entry_fn+0x28/0x130
process_one_work+0x26d/0x5c0
worker_thread+0x37/0x380
kthread+0x144/0x170
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #0 (&dev->master_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x151e/0x2590
lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0
__mutex_lock+0xab/0x970
drm_is_current_master+0x1b/0x40
drm_mode_getconnector+0x37e/0x4a0
drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa8/0xf0
drm_ioctl+0x1e8/0x390
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of: &dev->master_mutex --> &client->modeset_mutex --> &dev->mode_config.mutex
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
lock(&client->modeset_mutex);
lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
lock(&dev->master_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by kms_frontbuffer/1087:
#0: ffff88810dcd0488 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_mode_getconnector+0x1c6/0x4a0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 7 PID: 1087 Comm: kms_frontbuffer Not tainted 5.13.0-rc7-CI-CI_DRM_10254+ #1
Hardware name: Intel Corporation Ice Lake Client Platform/IceLake U DDR4 SODIMM PD RVP TLC, BIOS ICLSFWR1.R00.3234.A01.1906141750 06/14/2019
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x7f/0xad
check_noncircular+0x12e/0x150
__lock_acquire+0x151e/0x2590
lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0
__mutex_lock+0xab/0x970
drm_is_current_master+0x1b/0x40
drm_mode_getconnector+0x37e/0x4a0
drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa8/0xf0
drm_ioctl+0x1e8/0x390
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Reported-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210712043508.11584-2-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com
