Similar to for i915_active.mutex, we require each class of i915_active
to have distinct lockdep chains as some, but by no means all,
i915_active are used within the shrinker and so have much more severe
usage constraints. By using a lockclass local to i915_active_init() all
i915_active workers have the same lock class, and we may generate false
positives when waiting for the i915_active. If we push the lockclass
into the caller, each class of i915_active will have distinct lockdep
chains.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191202140133.2444217-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The unaligned ioread32() will make us read byte by byte looking for the
vbt. We could just as well have done a ioread8() + a shift and avoid the
extra confusion on how we are looking for "$VBT".
However when using ACPI it's guaranteed the VBT is 4-byte aligned
per spec, so we can probably assume it here as well.
v2: do not try to simplify the loop by eliminating the auxiliary counter
(Jani and Ville)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191126225110.8127-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
We don't need to keep the pci rom mapped during the entire
intel_bios_init() anymore. Move it to the previous copy_vbt() function
and rename it to oprom_get_vbt() since now it's responsible to to all
operations related to get the vbt from the oprom.
v2: fix double __iomem attribute detected by sparse
v3: fix missing unmap on success (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191126225110.8127-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
When we map the VBT through pci_map_rom() we may not be allowed
to simply discard the address space and go on reading the memory.
That doesn't work on my test system, but by dumping the rom via
sysfs I can can get the correct vbt. So change our find_vbt() to do
the same as done by pci_read_rom(), i.e. use memcpy_fromio().
v2: the just the minimal changes by not bothering with the unaligned io
reads: this can be done on top (from Ville and Jani)
v3: drop const in function return since now we are copying the vbt,
rather than just finding it
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191126225110.8127-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
eDP spec states that when sink enconters a problem that prevents it
to keep PSR running it should set PSR status to internal error and
set the reason why it happen to PSR_ERROR_STATUS but it is not how it
was implemented.
But also I don't want to change this behavior, who knows if there is
a panel out there that only set the PSR_ERROR_STATUS.
So here refactoring the code a bit to make more easy to read what was
state above as more checks will be added to this function.
v2:
returning a int instead of a bool in psr_get_status_and_error_status()
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-2-jose.souza@intel.com
The "err" label is not really "err", but rather "out" since the return
path is shared between error condition and normal path. This broke when
commit 03cea61076 ("drm/i915/dsb: fix extra warning on error path
handling") added a "dsb->cmd_buf = NULL;" there, making DSB to stop
working since now all writes would pass-through via mmio.
Remove the set to NULL since it's actually not needed: we only set it if
all steps are successful. While at it, rename the label so this confusion
doesn't happen again.
Fixes: 03cea61076 ("drm/i915/dsb: fix extra warning on error path handling")
Resolves: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127221119.384754-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
The bspec tells us 'Program SHPD_FILTER_CNT with the "500 microseconds
adjusted" value before enabling hotplug detection' on CNP+. We haven't
been touching this register at all thus far, but we should probably
follow the bspec's guidance.
The register also exists on LPT and SPT, but there isn't any specific
guidance I can find on how we should be programming it there so let's
leave it be for now.
Bspec: 4342
Bspec: 31297
Bspec: 8407
Bspec: 49305
Bspec: 50473
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127221314.575575-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
When looking at SDEISR to determine the connection status of combo
outputs, we should use the phy index rather than the port index.
Although they're usually the same thing, EHL's DDI-D (port D) is
attached to PHY-A and SDEISR doesn't even have bits for a "D" output.
It's also possible that future platforms may map DDIs (the internal
display engine programming units) to PHYs (the output handling on the IO
side) in ways where port!=phy, so let's look at the PHY index by
default.
v2: Rename to intel_combo_phy_connected. (Lucas)
Fixes: 719d240026 ("drm/i915/ehl: Enable DDI-D")
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127221314.575575-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
After much hair pulling, resort to preallocating the ppGTT entries on
init to circumvent the apparent lack of PD invalidate following the
write to PP_DCLV upon switching mm between contexts (and here the same
context after binding new objects). However, the details of that PP_DCLV
invalidate are still unknown, and it appears we need to reload the mm
twice to cover over a timing issue. Worrying.
Fixes: 3dc007fe9b ("drm/i915/gtt: Downgrade gen7 (ivb, byt, hsw) back to aliasing-ppgtt")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191129201328.1398583-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Implement Wa_1604555607 (set the DS pairing timer to 128 cycles).
FF_MODE2 is part of the register state context, that's why it is
implemented here.
At TGL A0 stepping, FF_MODE2 register read back is broken, hence
disabling the WA verification.
v2: Rebased on top of the WA refactoring (Oscar)
v3: Correctly add to ctx_workarounds_init (Michel)
v4:
uncore read is used [Tvrtko]
Macros as used for MASK definition [Chris]
v5:
Skip the Wa_1604555607 verification [Ram]
i915 ptr retrieved from engine. [Tvrtko]
v6:
Added wa_add as a wrapper for __wa_add [Chris]
wa_add is directly called instead of new wrapper [tvrtko]
BSpec: 19363
HSDES: 1604555607
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramlingam.c@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> [v5]
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128021005.3350-1-ramalingam.c@intel.com
One does not lightly add a new hidden struct_mutex dependency deep within
the execbuf bowels! The immediate suspicion in seeing the whitelist
cached on the context, is that it is intended to be preserved between
batches, as the kernel is quite adept at caching small allocations
itself. But no, it's sole purpose is to serialise command submission in
order to save a kmalloc on a slow, slow path!
By removing the whitelist dependency from the context, our freedom to
chop the big struct_mutex is greatly augmented.
v2: s/set_bit/__set_bit/ as the whitelist shall never be accessed
concurrently.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128113424.3885958-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The design of our interrupt handlers is that we ack the receipt of the
interrupt first, inside the critical section where the master interrupt
control is off and other cpus cannot start processing the next
interrupt; and then process the interrupt events afterwards. However,
Icelake introduced a whole new set of banked GT_IIR that are inherently
serialised and slow to retrieve the IIR and must be processed within the
critical section. We can still push our breadcrumbs out of this critical
section by using our irq_worker. On bdw+, this should not make too much
of a difference as we only slightly defer the breadcrumbs, but on icl+
this should make a big difference to our throughput of interrupts from
concurrently executing engines.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127115813.3345823-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The expected downside to commit 58b4c1a07a ("drm/i915: Reduce nested
prepare_remote_context() to a trylock") was that it would need to return
-EAGAIN to userspace in order to resolve potential mutex inversion. Such
an unsightly round trip is unnecessary if we could atomically insert a
barrier into the i915_active_fence, so make it happen.
Currently, we use the timeline->mutex (or some other named outer lock)
to order insertion into the i915_active_fence (and so individual nodes
of i915_active). Inside __i915_active_fence_set, we only need then
serialise with the interrupt handler in order to claim the timeline for
ourselves.
However, if we remove the outer lock, we need to ensure the order is
intact between not only multiple threads trying to insert themselves
into the timeline, but also with the interrupt handler completing the
previous occupant. We use xchg() on insert so that we have an ordered
sequence of insertions (and each caller knows the previous fence on
which to wait, preserving the chain of all fences in the timeline), but
we then have to cmpxchg() in the interrupt handler to avoid overwriting
the new occupant. The only nasty side-effect is having to temporarily
strip off the RCU-annotations to apply the atomic operations, otherwise
the rules are much more conventional!
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112402
Fixes: 58b4c1a07a ("drm/i915: Reduce nested prepare_remote_context() to a trylock")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127134527.3438410-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
