Assuming crtc->state is pointing at the correct thing for the
async flip commit is nonsense. If we had already queued up multiple
commits this would point at the very lates crtc state even if the
older commits hadn't even happened yet.
Instead properly stage/arm the event like we do for async flips.
Since we don't need to arm multiple of these at the same time we
don't need a list like the normal vblank even processing uses.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230928152450.30109-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
In C20 pll_state link_bit_rate and clock fields are bit redundant. Since
many of the helpers assume the clock values, which are different from
link_bit_rate for dp2.0, convert the helpers to use the numbers that
are compatible with link_bit_rate.
Currently link_bit_rate is compatible with crtc_state->port_clock. The
function intel_c20pll_calc_port_clock returns the number which is
compatible with crtc_state->port_clock. In order to avoid extra
conversions b/ween clock and link_bit_rate, remove "clock" field from the
C20 pll_state and then rename "link_bit_rate" as "clock".
While at it rely on crtc_state->port_clock during C20 Pll programming.
Cc: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231207221025.2032207-2-radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com
Since the plane_state variable is declared outside the scaler_users
loop in intel_atomic_setup_scalers(), and it's never reset back to
NULL inside the loop we may end up calling intel_atomic_setup_scaler()
with a non-NULL plane state for the pipe scaling case. That is bad
because intel_atomic_setup_scaler() determines whether we are doing
plane scaling or pipe scaling based on plane_state!=NULL. The end
result is that we may miscalculate the scaler mode for pipe scaling.
The hardware becomes somewhat upset if we end up in this situation
when scanning out a planar format on a SDR plane. We end up
programming the pipe scaler into planar mode as well, and the
result is a screenfull of garbage.
Fix the situation by making sure we pass the correct plane_state==NULL
when calculating the scaler mode for pipe scaling.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231207193441.20206-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
On ADL+ the hardware automagically calculates the CCS AUX surface
stride from the main surface stride, so when remapping we can't
really play a lot of tricks with the main surface stride, or else
the AUX surface stride would get miscalculated and no longer
match the actual data layout in memory.
Supposedly we could remap in 256 main surface tile units
(AUX page(4096)/cachline(64)*4(4x1 main surface tiles per
AUX cacheline)=256 main surface tiles), but the extra complexity
is probably not worth the hassle.
So let's just make sure our mapping stride is calculated from
the full framebuffer stride (instead of the framebuffer width).
This way the stride we program into PLANE_STRIDE will be the
original framebuffer stride, and thus there will be no change
to the AUX stride/layout.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231205180308.7505-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
The uncore code may not always be available (e.g. when we build the
display code with Xe), so we can't always rely on having the uncore's
spinlock.
To handle this, split the spin_lock/unlock_irqsave/restore() into
spin_lock/unlock() followed by a call to local_irq_save/restore() and
create wrapper functions for locking and unlocking the uncore's
spinlock. In these functions, we have a condition check and only
actually try to lock/unlock the spinlock when I915 is defined, and
thus uncore is available.
This keeps the ifdefs contained in these new functions and all such
logic inside the display code.
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrto.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231201100032.1367589-1-luciano.coelho@intel.com
plane_view_scanout_stride() currently assumes that we had to pad the
mapping stride with dummy pages in order to align it. But that is not
the case if the original fb stride exceeds the aligned stride used
to populate the remapped view, which is calculated from the user
specified framebuffer width rather than the user specified framebuffer
stride.
Ignore the original fb stride in this case and just stick to the POT
aligned stride. Getting this wrong will cause the plane to fetch the
wrong data, and can lead to fault errors if the page tables at the
bogus location aren't even populated.
TODO: figure out if this is OK for CCS, or if we should instead increase
the width of the view to cover the entire user specified fb stride
instead...
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231204202443.31247-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
We are preparing for Xe driver. Backing object implementation is differing
between i915 and Xe. Split i915 specific code into separate source file
built only for i915.
v9:
- Use ERR_CAST
v8:
- return original error code from intel_fb_bo_lookup_valid_bo on failure
v7:
- drop #include <drm/drm_plane.h>
- s/user_mode_cmd/mode_cmd/
- Use passed i915 pointer instead of to_i915(obj->base.dev)
v6: Add missing intel_fb_bo.[ch]
v5:
- Keep drm_any_plane_has_format check in intel_fb.c
- Use mode_cmd instead of user_mode_cmd for intel_fb_bo_lookup_valid_bo
v4: Move drm_any_plane_has_format check into intel_fb_bo.c
v3: Fix failure handling in intel_framebuffer_init
v2: Couple of fixes to error value handling
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231203114840.841311-5-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Use the >= and < operators for the DISPLAY_VER checks everywhere.
This is what most of the code does, but especially recently random
pieces of code have started doing this differently for no good reason.
Conversion done with the following cocci:
@find@
expression i915;
constant ver;
@@
(
DISPLAY_VER(i915) <= ver
|
DISPLAY_VER(i915) > ver
)
@script:python inc@
old_ver << find.ver;
new_ver;
@@
coccinelle.new_ver = str(int(old_ver) + 1)
@@
expression find.i915;
constant find.ver;
identifier inc.new_ver;
@@
(
- DISPLAY_VER(i915) <= ver
+ DISPLAY_VER(i915) < new_ver
|
- DISPLAY_VER(i915) > ver
+ DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= new_ver
)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231127145028.4899-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Currently we are enabling selective fetch for all planes that are visible.
This is suboptimal as we might be fetching for memory for planes that are
not part of selective update.
Fix this by adding proper handling for disabling plane selective fetch:
If plane previously part of selective update is now not part of update:
Add it into updated planes and let the plane configuration to disable
selective fetch for it.
v3: Checkpatch warnings fixed
v2:
- Add setting sel_fetch_area->y1/y2 to -1
- Remove setting again local sel_fetch_area variable
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231120082606.3156488-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
