Time Averaged SAR (TAS) tracks the amount of transmit power over a
period of time and adjusts the power accordingly. Two thresholds are
used to determine when to increase or reduce transmit power: Dynamic
Power Reduction (DPR) on/off. Compared to Static SAR, which has a
constant transmit power, TAS can improve the user experience or
range extension.
TAS can be enabled through BIOS, and the driver will evaluate
Realtek ACPI DSM with RTW89_ACPI_DSM_FUNC_TAS_EN to determine
whether TAS should be enabled.
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Chung Chen <damon.chen@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230804053458.31492-1-pkshih@realtek.com
Fix some kernel-doc comments to silence the warnings:
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pds_core/auxbus.c:18: warning: Function parameter or member 'pf' not described in 'pds_client_register'
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pds_core/auxbus.c:18: warning: Excess function parameter 'pf_pdev' description in 'pds_client_register'
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pds_core/auxbus.c:58: warning: Function parameter or member 'pf' not described in 'pds_client_unregister'
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pds_core/auxbus.c:58: warning: Excess function parameter 'pf_pdev' description in 'pds_client_unregister'
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
sk_getsockopt() runs locklessly. This means sk->sk_lingertime
can be read while other threads are changing its value.
Other reads also happen without socket lock being held,
and must be annotated.
Remove preprocessor logic using BITS_PER_LONG, compilers
are smart enough to figure this by themselves.
v2: fixed a clang W=1 (-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare) warning
(Jakub)
Fixes: 1da177e4c3 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add extack info for IPv4 address add/delete, which would be useful for
users to understand the problem without having to read kernel code.
No extack message for the ifa_local checking in __inet_insert_ifa() as
it has been checked in find_matching_ifa().
Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
1. XGMAC Core does not have hash_filter definition, it uses
vlhash(VLAN Hash Filtering) instead, skip hash_filter when XGMAC.
2. Show exact size of Hash Table instead of raw register value.
3. Show full description of safety features defined by Synopsys Databook.
4. When safety feature is configured with no parity, or ECC only,
keep FSM Parity Checking disabled.
Signed-off-by: Furong Xu <0x1207@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Hangbin Liu says:
====================
ipv6: update route when delete source address
Currently, when remove an address, the IPv6 route will not remove the
prefer source address when the address is bond to other device. Fix this
issue and add related tests as Ido and David suggested.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add a test case for IPv6 source address delete.
As David suggested, add tests:
- Single device using src address
- Two devices with the same source address
- VRF with single device using src address
- VRF with two devices using src address
As Ido points out, in IPv6, the preferred source address is looked up in
the same VRF as the first nexthop device. This will give us similar results
to IPv4 if the route is installed in the same VRF as the nexthop device, but
not when the nexthop device is enslaved to a different VRF. So add tests:
- src address and nexthop dev in same VR
- src address and nexthop device in different VRF
The link local address delete logic is different from the global address.
It should only affect the associate device it bonds to. So add tests cases
for link local address testing.
Here is the test result:
IPv6 delete address route tests
Single device using src address
TEST: Prefsrc removed when src address removed on other device [ OK ]
Two devices with the same source address
TEST: Prefsrc not removed when src address exist on other device [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc removed when src address removed on all devices [ OK ]
VRF with single device using src address
TEST: Prefsrc removed when src address removed on other device [ OK ]
VRF with two devices using src address
TEST: Prefsrc not removed when src address exist on other device [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc removed when src address removed on all devices [ OK ]
src address and nexthop dev in same VRF
TEST: Prefsrc removed from VRF when source address deleted [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc in default VRF not removed [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc not removed from VRF when source address exist [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc in default VRF removed [ OK ]
src address and nexthop device in different VRF
TEST: Prefsrc not removed from VRF when nexthop dev in diff VRF [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc not removed in default VRF [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc removed from VRF when nexthop dev in diff VRF [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc removed in default VRF [ OK ]
Table ID 0
TEST: Prefsrc removed from default VRF when source address deleted [ OK ]
Link local source route
TEST: Prefsrc not removed when delete ll addr from other dev [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc removed when delete ll addr [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc not removed when delete ll addr from other dev [ OK ]
TEST: Prefsrc removed even ll addr still exist on other dev [ OK ]
Tests passed: 19
Tests failed: 0
Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
Suggested-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
After deleting an IPv6 address on an interface and cleaning up the
related preferred source entries, it is important to ensure that all
routes associated with the deleted address are properly cleared. The
current implementation of rt6_remove_prefsrc() only checks the preferred
source addresses bound to the current device. However, there may be
routes that are bound to other devices but still utilize the same
preferred source address.
To address this issue, it is necessary to also delete entries that are
bound to other interfaces but share the same source address with the
current device. Failure to delete these entries would leave routes that
are bound to the deleted address unclear. Here is an example reproducer
(I have omitted unrelated routes):
+ ip link add dummy1 type dummy
+ ip link add dummy2 type dummy
+ ip link set dummy1 up
+ ip link set dummy2 up
+ ip addr add 1:2:3:4::5/64 dev dummy1
+ ip route add 7:7:7:0::1 dev dummy1 src 1:2:3:4::5
+ ip route add 7:7:7:0::2 dev dummy2 src 1:2:3:4::5
+ ip -6 route show
1:2:3:4::/64 dev dummy1 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
7:7:7::1 dev dummy1 src 1:2:3:4::5 metric 1024 pref medium
7:7:7::2 dev dummy2 src 1:2:3:4::5 metric 1024 pref medium
+ ip addr del 1:2:3:4::5/64 dev dummy1
+ ip -6 route show
7:7:7::1 dev dummy1 metric 1024 pref medium
7:7:7::2 dev dummy2 src 1:2:3:4::5 metric 1024 pref medium
As Ido reminds, in IPv6, the preferred source address is looked up in
the same VRF as the first nexthop device, which is different with IPv4.
So, while removing the device checking, we also need to add an
ipv6_chk_addr() check to make sure the address does not exist on the other
devices of the rt nexthop device's VRF.
After fix:
+ ip addr del 1:2:3:4::5/64 dev dummy1
+ ip -6 route show
7:7:7::1 dev dummy1 metric 1024 pref medium
7:7:7::2 dev dummy2 metric 1024 pref medium
Reported-by: Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170513
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
As the initial commit 1a01727676 ("selftests: Add VRF route leaking
tests") said, the IPv6 MTU test fails as source address selection
picking ::1. Every time we run the selftest this one report failed.
There seems not much meaning to keep reporting a failure for 3 years
that no one plan to fix/update. Let't just skip this one first. We can
add it back when the issue fixed.
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Setting IP_RECVERR and IPV6_RECVERR options to zero currently
purges the socket error queue, which was probably not expected
for zerocopy and tx_timestamp users.
I discovered this issue while preparing commit 6b5f43ea08
("inet: move inet->recverr to inet->inet_flags"), I presume this
change does not need to be backported to stable kernels.
Add skb_errqueue_purge() helper to purge error messages only.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Ruan Jinjie says:
====================
net: Return PTR_ERR() for fixed_phy_register()
fixed_phy_register() returns not only -EIO or -ENODEV, but also
-EPROBE_DEFER, -EINVAL and -EBUSY. The Best practice is to return these
error codes with PTR_ERR().
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
fixed_phy_register() returns -EPROBE_DEFER, -EINVAL and -EBUSY,
etc, in addition to -EIO. The Best practice is to return these
error codes with PTR_ERR().
Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
