mem_cgroup_calculate_protection() is not stateless and should only be used
as part of a top-down tree traversal. shrink_one() traverses the per-node
memcg LRU instead of the root_mem_cgroup tree, and therefore it should not
call mem_cgroup_calculate_protection().
The existing misuse in shrink_one() can cause ineffective protection of
sub-trees that are grandchildren of root_mem_cgroup. Fix it by reusing
lru_gen_age_node(), which already traverses the root_mem_cgroup tree, to
calculate the protection.
Previously lru_gen_age_node() opportunistically skips the first pass,
i.e., when scan_control->priority is DEF_PRIORITY. On the second pass,
lruvec_is_sizable() uses appropriate scan_control->priority, set by
set_initial_priority() from lru_gen_shrink_node(), to decide whether a
memcg is too small to reclaim from.
Now lru_gen_age_node() unconditionally traverses the root_mem_cgroup tree.
So it should call set_initial_priority() upfront, to make sure
lruvec_is_sizable() uses appropriate scan_control->priority on the first
pass. Otherwise, lruvec_is_reclaimable() can return false negatives and
result in premature OOM kills when min_ttl_ms is used.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240712232956.1427127-1-yuzhao@google.com
Fixes: e4dde56cd2 ("mm: multi-gen LRU: per-node lru_gen_folio lists")
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Reported-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
When tries to demote 1G hugetlb folios, a lockdep warning is observed:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.10.0-rc6-00452-ga4d0275fa660-dirty #79 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
bash/710 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8f0a7850 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0x244/0x460
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8f0a6f48 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0xae/0x460
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&h->resize_lock);
lock(&h->resize_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by bash/710:
#0: ffff8f118439c3f0 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x64/0xe0
#1: ffff8f11893b9e88 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xf8/0x1d0
#2: ffff8f1183dc4428 (kn->active#98){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x100/0x1d0
#3: ffffffff8f0a6f48 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0xae/0x460
stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 PID: 710 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.10.0-rc6-00452-ga4d0275fa660-dirty #79
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0
__lock_acquire+0x10f2/0x1ca0
lock_acquire+0xbe/0x2d0
__mutex_lock+0x6d/0x400
demote_store+0x244/0x460
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x12c/0x1d0
vfs_write+0x380/0x540
ksys_write+0x64/0xe0
do_syscall_64+0xb9/0x1d0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7fa61db14887
RSP: 002b:00007ffc56c48358 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007fa61db14887
RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 000055a030050220 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: 000055a030050220 R08: 00007fa61dbd1460 R09: 000000007fffffff
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
R13: 00007fa61dc1b780 R14: 00007fa61dc17600 R15: 00007fa61dc16a00
</TASK>
Lockdep considers this an AA deadlock because the different resize_lock
mutexes reside in the same lockdep class, but this is a false positive.
Place them in distinct classes to avoid these warnings.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240712031314.2570452-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: 8531fc6f52 ("hugetlb: add hugetlb demote page support")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
If a large number of CMA memory are configured in system (for example,
the CMA memory accounts for 50% of the system memory), starting a
virtual virtual machine with device passthrough, it will call
pin_user_pages_remote(..., FOLL_LONGTERM, ...) to pin memory. Normally
if a page is present and in CMA area, pin_user_pages_remote() will
migrate the page from CMA area to non-CMA area because of FOLL_LONGTERM
flag. But the current code will cause the migration failure due to
unexpected page refcounts, and eventually cause the virtual machine
fail to start.
If a page is added in LRU batch, its refcount increases one, remove the
page from LRU batch decreases one. Page migration requires the page is
not referenced by others except page mapping. Before migrating a page,
we should try to drain the page from LRU batch in case the page is in
it, however, folio_test_lru() is not sufficient to tell whether the
page is in LRU batch or not, if the page is in LRU batch, the migration
will fail.
To solve the problem above, we modify the logic of adding to LRU batch.
Before adding a page to LRU batch, we clear the LRU flag of the page
so that we can check whether the page is in LRU batch by
folio_test_lru(page). It's quite valuable, because likely we don't
want to blindly drain the LRU batch simply because there is some
unexpected reference on a page, as described above.
This change makes the LRU flag of a page invisible for longer, which
may impact some programs. For example, as long as a page is on a LRU
batch, we cannot isolate it, and we cannot check if it's an LRU page.
Further, a page can now only be on exactly one LRU batch. This doesn't
seem to matter much, because a new page is allocated from buddy and
added to the lru batch, or be isolated, it's LRU flag may also be
invisible for a long time.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1720075944-27201-1-git-send-email-yangge1116@126.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1720008153-16035-1-git-send-email-yangge1116@126.com
Fixes: 9a4e9f3b2d ("mm: update get_user_pages_longterm to migrate pages allocated from CMA region")
Signed-off-by: yangge <yangge1116@126.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Since balancing mode was added in bda420b985 ("numa balancing: migrate
on fault among multiple bound nodes"), it was possible to set this mode
but it wouldn't be shown in /proc/<pid>/numa_maps since there was no
support for it in the mpol_to_str() helper.
Furthermore, because the balancing mode sets the MPOL_F_MORON flag, it
would be displayed as 'default' due a workaround introduced a few years
earlier in 8790c71a18 ("mm/mempolicy.c: fix mempolicy printing in
numa_maps").
To tidy this up we implement two changes:
Replace the MPOL_F_MORON check by pointer comparison against the
preferred_node_policy array. By doing this we generalise the current
special casing and replace the incorrect 'default' with the correct 'bind'
for the mode.
Secondly, we add a string representation and corresponding handling for
the MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING flag.
With the two changes together we start showing the balancing flag when it
is set and therefore complete the fix.
Representation format chosen is to separate multiple flags with vertical
bars, following what existed long time ago in kernel 2.6.25. But as
between then and now there wasn't a way to display multiple flags, this
patch does not change the format in practice.
Some /proc/<pid>/numa_maps output examples:
555559580000 bind=balancing:0-1,3 file=...
555585800000 bind=balancing|static:0,2 file=...
555635240000 prefer=relative:0 file=
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240708075632.95857-1-tursulin@igalia.com
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
Fixes: bda420b985 ("numa balancing: migrate on fault among multiple bound nodes")
References: 8790c71a18 ("mm/mempolicy.c: fix mempolicy printing in numa_maps")
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [5.12+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Currently MOVE_ANON and MOVE_FILE flags are defined as integers
and it leads to the following Smatch static checker warning:
mm/memcontrol-v1.c:609 mem_cgroup_move_charge_write()
warn: was expecting a 64 bit value instead of '~(1 | 2)'
Fix this be redefining them as unsigned long long.
Even though the issue allows to set high 32 bits of mc.flags
to an arbitrary number, these bits are never used, so it doesn't
have any significant consequences.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ZpF8Q9zBsIY7d2P9@google.com
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
set_initial_priority() tries to jump-start global reclaim by estimating
the priority based on cold/hot LRU pages. The estimation does not account
for shrinker objects, and it cannot do so because their sizes can be in
different units other than page.
If shrinker objects are the majority, e.g., on TrueNAS SCALE 24.04.0 where
ZFS ARC can use almost all system memory, set_initial_priority() can
vastly underestimate how much memory ARC shrinker can evict and assign
extreme low values to scan_control->priority, resulting in overshoots of
shrinker objects.
To reproduce the problem, using TrueNAS SCALE 24.04.0 with 32GB DRAM, a
test ZFS pool and the following commands:
fio --name=mglru.file --numjobs=36 --ioengine=io_uring \
--directory=/root/test-zfs-pool/ --size=1024m --buffered=1 \
--rw=randread --random_distribution=random \
--time_based --runtime=1h &
for ((i = 0; i < 20; i++))
do
sleep 120
fio --name=mglru.anon --numjobs=16 --ioengine=mmap \
--filename=/dev/zero --size=1024m --fadvise_hint=0 \
--rw=randrw --random_distribution=random \
--time_based --runtime=1m
done
To fix the problem:
1. Cap scan_control->priority at or above DEF_PRIORITY/2, to prevent
the jump-start from being overly aggressive.
2. Account for the progress from mm_account_reclaimed_pages(), to
prevent kswapd_shrink_node() from raising the priority
unnecessarily.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240711191957.939105-2-yuzhao@google.com
Fixes: e4dde56cd2 ("mm: multi-gen LRU: per-node lru_gen_folio lists")
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Reported-by: Alexander Motin <mav@ixsystems.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
evict_folios() uses a second pass to reclaim folios that have gone through
page writeback and become clean before it finishes the first pass, since
folio_rotate_reclaimable() cannot handle those folios due to the
isolation.
The second pass tries to avoid potential double counting by deducting
scan_control->nr_scanned. However, this can result in underflow of
nr_scanned, under a condition where shrink_folio_list() does not increment
nr_scanned, i.e., when folio_trylock() fails.
The underflow can cause the divisor, i.e., scale=scanned+reclaimed in
vmpressure_calc_level(), to become zero, resulting in the following crash:
[exception RIP: vmpressure_work_fn+101]
process_one_work at ffffffffa3313f2b
Since scan_control->nr_scanned has no established semantics, the potential
double counting has minimal risks. Therefore, fix the problem by not
deducting scan_control->nr_scanned in evict_folios().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240711191957.939105-1-yuzhao@google.com
Fixes: 359a5e1416 ("mm: multi-gen LRU: retry folios written back while isolated")
Reported-by: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Motin <mav@ixsystems.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "revert unconditional slab and page allocator fault injection
calls".
These two patches largely revert commits that added function call overhead
into slab and page allocation hotpaths and that cannot be currently
disabled even though related CONFIG_ options do exist.
A much more involved solution that can keep the callsites always existing
but hidden behind a static key if unused, is possible [1] and can be
pursued by anyone who believes it's necessary. Meanwhile the fact the
should_failslab() error injection is already not functional on kernels
built with current gcc without anyone noticing [2], and lukewarm response
to [1] suggests the need is not there. I believe it will be more fair to
have the state after this series as a baseline for possible further
optimisation, instead of the unconditional overhead.
For example a possible compromise for anyone who's fine with an empty
function call overhead but not the full CONFIG_FAILSLAB /
CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC overhead is to reuse patch 1 from [1] but insert a
static key check only inside should_failslab() and
should_fail_alloc_page() before performing the more expensive checks.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240620-fault-injection-statickeys-v2-0-e23947d3d84b@suse.cz/#t
[2] https://github.com/bpftrace/bpftrace/issues/3258
This patch (of 2):
This mostly reverts commit 4f6923fbb3 ("mm: make should_failslab always
available for fault injection"). The commit made should_failslab() a
noinline function that's always called from the slab allocation hotpath,
even if it's empty because CONFIG_SHOULD_FAILSLAB is not enabled, and
there is no option to disable that call. This is visible in profiles and
the function call overhead can be noticeable especially with cpu
mitigations.
Meanwhile the bpftrace program example in the commit silently does not
work without CONFIG_SHOULD_FAILSLAB anyway with a recent gcc, because the
empty function gets a .constprop clone that is actually being called
(uselessly) from the slab hotpath, while the error injection is hooked to
the original function that's not being called at all [1].
Thus put the whole should_failslab() function back behind
CONFIG_SHOULD_FAILSLAB. It's not a complete revert of 4f6923fbb3 - the
int return type that returns -ENOMEM on failure is preserved, as well
ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION annotation. The BTF_ID() record that was meanwhile
added is also guarded by CONFIG_SHOULD_FAILSLAB.
[1] https://github.com/bpftrace/bpftrace/issues/3258
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240711-b4-fault-injection-reverts-v1-0-9e2651945d68@suse.cz
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240711-b4-fault-injection-reverts-v1-1-9e2651945d68@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
generic_hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() was returning an address less than
mmap_min_addr if the mmap argument addr, after alignment, was less than
mmap_min_addr, causing mmap to fail.
This is because current generic_hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() code does not
take into account mmap_min_addr.
This patch ensures that generic_hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() always returns
an address that is greater than mmap_min_addr. Additionally, similar to
generic_get_unmapped_area(), vm_end_gap() checks are included to maintain
stack gap.
How to reproduce
================
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define HUGEPAGE_SIZE (16 * 1024 * 1024)
int main() {
void *addr = mmap((void *)-1, HUGEPAGE_SIZE,
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_HUGETLB, -1, 0);
if (addr == MAP_FAILED) {
perror("mmap");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
snprintf((char *)addr, HUGEPAGE_SIZE, "Hello, Huge Pages!");
printf("%s\n", (char *)addr);
if (munmap(addr, HUGEPAGE_SIZE) == -1) {
perror("munmap");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
return 0;
}
Result without fix
==================
# cat /proc/meminfo |grep -i HugePages_Free
HugePages_Free: 20
# ./test
mmap: Permission denied
#
Result with fix
===============
# cat /proc/meminfo |grep -i HugePages_Free
HugePages_Free: 20
# ./test
Hello, Huge Pages!
#
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240710051912.4681-1-donettom@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by Pavithra Prakash <pavrampu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The legacy PMD-sized THP counters at /proc/vmstat include thp_file_alloc,
thp_file_fallback and thp_file_fallback_charge, which rather confusingly
refer to shmem THP and do not include any other types of file pages. This
is inconsistent since in most other places in the kernel, THP counters are
explicitly separated for anon, shmem and file flavours. However, we are
stuck with it since it constitutes a user ABI.
Recently, commit 66f44583f9 ("mm: shmem: add mTHP counters for anonymous
shmem") added equivalent mTHP stats for shmem, keeping the same "file_"
prefix in the names. But in future, we may want to add extra stats to
cover actual file pages, at which point, it would all become very
confusing.
So let's take the opportunity to rename these new counters "shmem_" before
the change makes it upstream and the ABI becomes immutable. While we are
at it, let's improve the documentation for the legacy counters to make it
clear that they count shmem pages only.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240710095503.3193901-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The current memory tier initialization process is distributed across two
different functions, memory_tier_init() and memory_tier_late_init(). This
design is hard to maintain. Thus, this patch is proposed to reduce the
possible code paths by consolidating different initialization patches into
one.
The earlier discussion with Jonathan and Ying is listed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240405150244.00004b49@Huawei.com/
If we want to put these two initializations together, they must be placed
together in the later function. Because only at that time, the HMAT
information will be ready, adist between nodes can be calculated, and
memory tiering can be established based on the adist. So we position the
initialization at memory_tier_init() to the memory_tier_late_init() call.
Moreover, it's natural to keep memory_tier initialization in drivers at
device_initcall() level.
If we simply move the set_node_memory_tier() from memory_tier_init() to
late_initcall(), it will result in HMAT not registering the
mt_adistance_algorithm callback function, because set_node_memory_tier()
is not performed during the memory tiering initialization phase, leading
to a lack of correct default_dram information.
Therefore, we introduced a nodemask to pass the information of the default
DRAM nodes. The reason for not choosing to reuse default_dram_type->nodes
is that it is not clean enough. So in the end, we use a __initdata
variable, which is a variable that is released once initialization is
complete, including both CPU and memory nodes for HMAT to iterate through.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240704072646.437579-1-horen.chuang@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horenchuang@bytedance.com>
Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@gmail.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Ravi Jonnalagadda <ravis.opensrc@micron.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
e500 supports many page sizes among which the following size are
implemented in the kernel at the time being: 4M, 16M, 64M, 256M, 1G.
On e500, TLB miss for hugepages is exclusively handled by SW even on e6500
which has HW assistance for 4k pages, so there are no constraints like on
the 8xx.
On e500/32, all are at PGD/PMD level and can be handled as cont-PMD.
On e500/64, smaller ones are on PMD while bigger ones are on PUD. Again,
they can easily be handled as cont-PMD and cont-PUD instead of hugepd.
On e500/32, use the pagesize bits in PTE to know if it is a PMD or a leaf
entry. This works because the pagesize bits are in the last 12 bits and
page tables are 4k aligned.
On e500/64, use highest bit which is always 1 on PxD (Because PxD contains
virtual address of a kernel memory) and always 0 on PTEs because not all
bits of RPN are used/possible.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/dd085987816ed2a0c70adb7e34966cb833fc03e1.1719928057.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Use PTE page size bits to encode hugepage size with the following format
corresponding to the values expected in bits 52-55 in MAS1 register.
Those bits are called TSIZE:
0001 4 Kbyte
0010 16 Kbyte
0011 64 Kbyte
0100 256 Kbyte
0101 1 Mbyte
0110 4 Mbyte
0111 16 Mbyte
1000 64 Mbyte
1001 256 Mbyte
1010 1 Gbyte
1011 4 Gbyte
1100 16 Gbyte
1101 64 Gbyte
1110 256 Gbyte
1111 1 Tbyte
It corresponds to shift value minus 10 with lowest bit removed.
It is not the value expected in the PTE in that field, but only e6500
performs HW based TLB loading and the e6500 reference manual explicitely
says that this field is ignored.
Also add pte_huge_size() which will be used later.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6f7ce82fa8c381d55f65342d77060fc55802e612.1719928057.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
