Patch series "introduce kasan.write_only option in hw-tags", v8.
Hardware tag based KASAN is implemented using the Memory Tagging Extension
(MTE) feature.
MTE is built on top of the ARMv8.0 virtual address tagging TBI (Top Byte
Ignore) feature and allows software to access a 4-bit allocation tag for
each 16-byte granule in the physical address space. A logical tag is
derived from bits 59-56 of the virtual address used for the memory access.
A CPU with MTE enabled will compare the logical tag against the
allocation tag and potentially raise an tag check fault on mismatch,
subject to system registers configuration.
Since ARMv8.9, FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY can be used to restrict raise of tag
check fault on store operation only.
Using this feature (FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY), introduce KASAN write-only mode
which restricts KASAN check write (store) operation only. This mode omits
KASAN check for read (fetch/load) operation. Therefore, it might be used
not only debugging purpose but also in normal environment.
This patch (of 2):
Since Armv8.9, FEATURE_MTE_STORE_ONLY feature is introduced to restrict
raise of tag check fault on store operation only. Introduce KASAN write
only mode based on this feature.
KASAN write only mode restricts KASAN checks operation for write only and
omits the checks for fetch/read operations when accessing memory. So it
might be used not only debugging enviroment but also normal enviroment to
check memory safty.
This features can be controlled with "kasan.write_only" arguments. When
"kasan.write_only=on", KASAN checks write operation only otherwise KASAN
checks all operations.
This changes the MTE_STORE_ONLY feature as BOOT_CPU_FEATURE like
ARM64_MTE_ASYMM so that makes it initialise in kasan_init_hw_tags() with
other function together.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250916222755.466009-1-yeoreum.yun@arm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250916222755.466009-2-yeoreum.yun@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: D Scott Phillips <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: Hardevsinh Palaniya <hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: levi.yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>
Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
We want to get rid of nth_page(), and kfence init code is the last user.
Unfortunately, we might actually walk a PFN range where the pages are not
contiguous, because we might be allocating an area from memblock that
could span memory sections in problematic kernel configs (SPARSEMEM
without SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP).
We could check whether the page range is contiguous using
page_range_contiguous() and failing kfence init, or making kfence
incompatible these problemtic kernel configs.
Let's keep it simple and simply use pfn_to_page() by iterating PFNs.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250901150359.867252-36-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The expectation is that there is currently no user that would pass in
non-contigous page ranges: no allocator, not even VMA, will hand these
out.
The only problematic part would be if someone would provide a range
obtained directly from memblock, or manually merge problematic ranges. If
we find such cases, we should fix them to create separate SG entries.
Let's check in sg_set_page() that this is really the case. No need to
check in sg_set_folio(), as pages in a folio are guaranteed to be
contiguous. As sg_set_page() gets inlined into modules, we have to export
the page_range_contiguous() helper -- use EXPORT_SYMBOL, there is nothing
special about this helper such that we would want to enforce GPL-only
modules.
We can now drop the nth_page() usage in sg_page_iter_page().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250901150359.867252-25-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Let's disallow handing out PFN ranges with non-contiguous pages, so we can
remove the nth-page usage in __cma_alloc(), and so any callers don't have
to worry about that either when wanting to blindly iterate pages.
This is really only a problem in configs with SPARSEMEM but without
SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, and only when we would cross memory sections in some
cases.
Will this cause harm? Probably not, because it's mostly 32bit that does
not support SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP. If this ever becomes a problem we could
look into allocating the memmap for the memory sections spanned by a
single CMA region in one go from memblock.
[david@redhat.com: we can have NUMMU configs with SPARSEMEM enabled]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6ec933b1-b3f7-41c0-95d8-e518bb87375e@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250901150359.867252-23-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Let's make it clearer that we are operating within a single folio by
providing both the folio and the page.
This implies that for flush_dcache_folio() we'll now avoid one more
page->folio lookup, and that we can safely drop the "nth_page" usage.
While at it, drop the "extern" from the function declaration.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250901150359.867252-22-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Within a folio/compound page, nth_page() is no longer required. Given
that we call folio_test_partial_kmap()+kmap_local_page(), the code would
already be problematic if the pages would span multiple folios.
So let's just assume that all src pages belong to a single folio/compound
page and can be iterated ordinarily. The dst page is currently always a
single page, so we're not actually iterating anything.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250901150359.867252-21-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
We can now safely iterate over all pages in a folio, so no need for the
pfn_to_page().
Also, as we already force the refcount in __init_single_page() to 1
through init_page_count(), we can just set the refcount to 0 and avoid
page_ref_freeze() + VM_BUG_ON. Likely, in the future, we would just want
to tell __init_single_page() to which value to initialize the refcount.
Further, adjust the comments to highlight that we are dealing with an
open-coded prep_compound_page() variant, and add another comment
explaining why we really need the __init_single_page() only on the tail
pages.
Note that the current code was likely problematic, but we never ran into
it: prep_compound_tail() would have been called with an offset that might
exceed a memory section, and prep_compound_tail() would have simply added
that offset to the page pointer -- which would not have done the right
thing on sparsemem without vmemmap.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250901150359.867252-14-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Let's limit the maximum folio size in problematic kernel config where the
memmap is allocated per memory section (SPARSEMEM without
SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) to a single memory section.
Currently, only a single architectures supports ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE but
not SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP: sh.
Fortunately, the biggest hugetlb size sh supports is 64 MiB
(HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_64MB) and the section size is at least 64 MiB
(SECTION_SIZE_BITS == 26), so their use case is not degraded.
As folios and memory sections are naturally aligned to their order-2 size
in memory, consequently a single folio can no longer span multiple memory
sections on these problematic kernel configs.
nth_page() is no longer required when operating within a single compound
page / folio.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250901150359.867252-12-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Grepping for "prep_compound_page" leaves on clueless how devdax gets its
compound pages initialized.
Let's add a comment that might help finding this open-coded
prep_compound_page() initialization more easily.
Further, let's be less smart about the ordering of initialization and just
perform the prep_compound_head() call after all tail pages were
initialized: just like prep_compound_page() does.
No need for a comment to describe the initialization order: again, just
like prep_compound_page().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250901150359.867252-10-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Let's check that no hstate that corresponds to an unreasonable folio size
is registered by an architecture. If we were to succeed registering, we
could later try allocating an unsupported gigantic folio size.
Further, let's add a BUILD_BUG_ON() for checking that HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER
is sane at build time. As HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER is dynamic on powerpc, we
have to use a BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID() to make it compile.
No existing kernel configuration should be able to trigger this check:
either SPARSEMEM without SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP cannot be configured or
gigantic folios will not exceed a memory section (the case on sparse).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250901150359.867252-9-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Let's reject unreasonable folio sizes early, where we can still fail.
We'll add sanity checks to prepare_compound_head/prepare_compound_page
next.
Is there a way to configure a system such that unreasonable folio sizes
would be possible? It would already be rather questionable.
If so, we'd probably want to bail out earlier, where we can avoid a WARN
and just report a proper error message that indicates where something went
wrong such that we messed up.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250901150359.867252-8-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm: remove zpool".
zpool is an indirection layer for zswap to switch between multiple
allocator backends at runtime. Since 6.15, zsmalloc is the only allocator
left in-tree, so there is no point in keeping zpool around.
This patch (of 3):
zswap goes through the zpool layer to enable runtime-switching of
allocator backends for compressed data. However, since zbud and z3fold
were removed in 6.15, zsmalloc has been the only option available.
As such, the zpool indirection is unnecessary. Make zswap deal with
zsmalloc directly. This is comparable to zram, which also directly
interacts with zsmalloc and has never supported a different backend.
Note that this does not preclude future improvements and experiments with
different allocation strategies. Should it become necessary, it's
possible to provide an alternate implementation for the zsmalloc API,
selectable at compile time. However, zsmalloc is also rather mature and
feature rich, with years of widespread production exposure; it's
encouraged to make incremental improvements rather than fork it.
In any case, the complexity of runtime pluggability seems excessive and
unjustified at this time. Switch zswap to zsmalloc to remove the last
user of the zpool API.
[hannes@cmpxchg.org: fix default compressr test]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250915153640.GA828739@cmpxchg.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250829162212.208258-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250829162212.208258-2-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Nacked-by: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.se>
Acked-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "kasan: unify kasan_enabled() and remove arch-specific
implementations", v6.
This patch series addresses the fragmentation in KASAN initialization
across architectures by introducing a unified approach that eliminates
duplicate static keys and arch-specific kasan_arch_is_ready()
implementations.
The core issue is that different architectures have inconsistent approaches
to KASAN readiness tracking:
- PowerPC, LoongArch, and UML arch, each implement own kasan_arch_is_ready()
- Only HW_TAGS mode had a unified static key (kasan_flag_enabled)
- Generic and SW_TAGS modes relied on arch-specific solutions
or always-on behavior
This patch (of 2):
Introduce CONFIG_ARCH_DEFER_KASAN to identify architectures [1] that need
to defer KASAN initialization until shadow memory is properly set up, and
unify the static key infrastructure across all KASAN modes.
[1] PowerPC, UML, LoongArch selects ARCH_DEFER_KASAN.
The core issue is that different architectures haveinconsistent approaches
to KASAN readiness tracking:
- PowerPC, LoongArch, and UML arch, each implement own
kasan_arch_is_ready()
- Only HW_TAGS mode had a unified static key (kasan_flag_enabled)
- Generic and SW_TAGS modes relied on arch-specific solutions or always-on
behavior
This patch addresses the fragmentation in KASAN initialization across
architectures by introducing a unified approach that eliminates duplicate
static keys and arch-specific kasan_arch_is_ready() implementations.
Let's replace kasan_arch_is_ready() with existing kasan_enabled() check,
which examines the static key being enabled if arch selects
ARCH_DEFER_KASAN or has HW_TAGS mode support. For other arch,
kasan_enabled() checks the enablement during compile time.
Now KASAN users can use a single kasan_enabled() check everywhere.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250810125746.1105476-1-snovitoll@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250810125746.1105476-2-snovitoll@gmail.com
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217049
Signed-off-by: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> #powerpc
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Qing Zhang <zhangqing@loongson.cn>
Cc: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@gmail.com>
Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
