Pull 9p updates from Dominique Martinet:
"Fixes, netfs read support and checkpatch rewrite:
- fix syzcaller uninitialized value usage after missing error check
- add module autoloading based on transport name
- convert cached reads to use netfs helpers
- adjust readahead based on transport msize
- and many, many checkpatch.pl warning fixes..."
* tag '9p-for-5.16-rc1' of git://github.com/martinetd/linux:
9p: fix a bunch of checkpatch warnings
9p: set readahead and io size according to maxsize
9p p9mode2perm: remove useless strlcpy and check sscanf return code
9p v9fs_parse_options: replace simple_strtoul with kstrtouint
9p: fix file headers
fs/9p: fix indentation and Add missing a blank line after declaration
fs/9p: fix warnings found by checkpatch.pl
9p: fix minor indentation and codestyle
fs/9p: cleanup: opening brace at the beginning of the next line
9p: Convert to using the netfs helper lib to do reads and caching
fscache_cookie_enabled: check cookie is valid before accessing it
net/9p: autoload transport modules
9p/net: fix missing error check in p9_check_errors
Merge more updates from Andrew Morton:
"87 patches.
Subsystems affected by this patch series: mm (pagecache and hugetlb),
procfs, misc, MAINTAINERS, lib, checkpatch, binfmt, kallsyms, ramfs,
init, codafs, nilfs2, hfs, crash_dump, signals, seq_file, fork,
sysvfs, kcov, gdb, resource, selftests, and ipc"
* emailed patches from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>: (87 commits)
ipc/ipc_sysctl.c: remove fallback for !CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL
ipc: check checkpoint_restore_ns_capable() to modify C/R proc files
selftests/kselftest/runner/run_one(): allow running non-executable files
virtio-mem: disallow mapping virtio-mem memory via /dev/mem
kernel/resource: disallow access to exclusive system RAM regions
kernel/resource: clean up and optimize iomem_is_exclusive()
scripts/gdb: handle split debug for vmlinux
kcov: replace local_irq_save() with a local_lock_t
kcov: avoid enable+disable interrupts if !in_task()
kcov: allocate per-CPU memory on the relevant node
Documentation/kcov: define `ip' in the example
Documentation/kcov: include types.h in the example
sysv: use BUILD_BUG_ON instead of runtime check
kernel/fork.c: unshare(): use swap() to make code cleaner
seq_file: fix passing wrong private data
seq_file: move seq_escape() to a header
signal: remove duplicate include in signal.h
crash_dump: remove duplicate include in crash_dump.h
crash_dump: fix boolreturn.cocci warning
hfs/hfsplus: use WARN_ON for sanity check
...
This commit removes the requirement to be root to modify sem_next_id,
msg_next_id and shm_next_id and checks checkpoint_restore_ns_capable
instead.
Since those files are specific to the IPC namespace, there is no reason
they should require root privileges. This is similar to ns_last_pid,
which also only checks checkpoint_restore_ns_capable.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: ipc/ipc_sysctl.c needs capability.h for checkpoint_restore_ns_capable()]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210916163717.3179496-1-mclapinski@google.com
Signed-off-by: Michal Clapinski <mclapinski@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When running a test program, 'run_one()' checks if the program has the
execution permission and fails if it doesn't. However, it's easy to
mistakenly lose the permissions, as some common tools like 'diff' don't
support the permission change well[1]. Compared to that, making mistakes
in the test program's path would only rare, as those are explicitly listed
in 'TEST_PROGS'. Therefore, it might make more sense to resolve the
situation on our own and run the program.
For this reason, this commit makes the test program runner function still
print the warning message but to try parsing the interpreter of the
program and to explicitly run it with the interpreter, in this case.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/YRJisBs9AunccCD4@kroah.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210810164534.25902-1-sj38.park@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We don't want user space to be able to map virtio-mem device memory
directly (e.g., via /dev/mem) in order to have guarantees that in a sane
setup we'll never accidentially access unplugged memory within the
device-managed region of a virtio-mem device, just as required by the
virtio-spec.
As soon as the virtio-mem driver is loaded, the device region is visible
in /proc/iomem via the parent device region. From that point on user
space is aware of the device region and we want to disallow mapping
anything inside that region (where we will dynamically (un)plug memory)
until the driver has been unloaded cleanly and e.g., another driver might
take over.
By creating our parent IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM resource with
IORESOURCE_EXCLUSIVE, we will disallow any /dev/mem access to our device
region until the driver was unloaded cleanly and removed the parent
region. This will work even though only some memory blocks are actually
currently added to Linux and appear as busy in the resource tree.
So access to the region from user space is only possible
a) if we don't load the virtio-mem driver.
b) after unloading the virtio-mem driver cleanly.
Don't build virtio-mem if access to /dev/mem cannot be restricticted -- if
we have CONFIG_DEVMEM=y but CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM is not set.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210920142856.17758-4-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
virtio-mem dynamically exposes memory inside a device memory region as
system RAM to Linux, coordinating with the hypervisor which parts are
actually "plugged" and consequently usable/accessible.
On the one hand, the virtio-mem driver adds/removes whole memory blocks,
creating/removing busy IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM resources, on the other
hand, it logically (un)plugs memory inside added memory blocks,
dynamically either exposing them to the buddy or hiding them from the
buddy and marking them PG_offline.
In contrast to physical devices, like a DIMM, the virtio-mem driver is
required to actually make use of any of the device-provided memory,
because it performs the handshake with the hypervisor. virtio-mem
memory cannot simply be access via /dev/mem without a driver.
There is no safe way to:
a) Access plugged memory blocks via /dev/mem, as they might contain
unplugged holes or might get silently unplugged by the virtio-mem
driver and consequently turned inaccessible.
b) Access unplugged memory blocks via /dev/mem because the virtio-mem
driver is required to make them actually accessible first.
The virtio-spec states that unplugged memory blocks MUST NOT be written,
and only selected unplugged memory blocks MAY be read. We want to make
sure, this is the case in sane environments -- where the virtio-mem driver
was loaded.
We want to make sure that in a sane environment, nobody "accidentially"
accesses unplugged memory inside the device managed region. For example,
a user might spot a memory region in /proc/iomem and try accessing it via
/dev/mem via gdb or dumping it via something else. By the time the mmap()
happens, the memory might already have been removed by the virtio-mem
driver silently: the mmap() would succeeed and user space might
accidentially access unplugged memory.
So once the driver was loaded and detected the device along the
device-managed region, we just want to disallow any access via /dev/mem to
it.
In an ideal world, we would mark the whole region as busy ("owned by a
driver") and exclude it; however, that would be wrong, as we don't really
have actual system RAM at these ranges added to Linux ("busy system RAM").
Instead, we want to mark such ranges as "not actual busy system RAM but
still soft-reserved and prepared by a driver for future use."
Let's teach iomem_is_exclusive() to reject access to any range with
"IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_EXCLUSIVE", even if not busy and even
if "iomem=relaxed" is set. Introduce EXCLUSIVE_SYSTEM_RAM to make it
easier for applicable drivers to depend on this setting in their Kconfig.
For now, there are no applicable ranges and we'll modify virtio-mem next
to properly set IORESOURCE_EXCLUSIVE on the parent resource container it
creates to contain all actual busy system RAM added via
add_memory_driver_managed().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210920142856.17758-3-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "virtio-mem: disallow mapping virtio-mem memory via /dev/mem", v5.
Let's add the basic infrastructure to exclude some physical memory regions
marked as "IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM" completely from /dev/mem access, even
though they are not marked IORESOURCE_BUSY and even though "iomem=relaxed"
is set. Resource IORESOURCE_EXCLUSIVE for that purpose instead of adding
new flags to express something similar to "soft-busy" or "not busy yet,
but already prepared by a driver and not to be mapped by user space".
Use it for virtio-mem, to disallow mapping any virtio-mem memory via
/dev/mem to user space after the virtio-mem driver was loaded.
This patch (of 3):
We end up traversing subtrees of ranges we are not interested in; let's
optimize this case, skipping such subtrees, cleaning up the function a
bit.
For example, in the following configuration (/proc/iomem):
00000000-00000fff : Reserved
00001000-00057fff : System RAM
00058000-00058fff : Reserved
00059000-0009cfff : System RAM
0009d000-000fffff : Reserved
000a0000-000bffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
000c0000-000c3fff : PCI Bus 0000:00
000c4000-000c7fff : PCI Bus 0000:00
000c8000-000cbfff : PCI Bus 0000:00
000cc000-000cffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
000d0000-000d3fff : PCI Bus 0000:00
000d4000-000d7fff : PCI Bus 0000:00
000d8000-000dbfff : PCI Bus 0000:00
000dc000-000dffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
000e0000-000e3fff : PCI Bus 0000:00
000e4000-000e7fff : PCI Bus 0000:00
000e8000-000ebfff : PCI Bus 0000:00
000ec000-000effff : PCI Bus 0000:00
000f0000-000fffff : PCI Bus 0000:00
000f0000-000fffff : System ROM
00100000-3fffffff : System RAM
40000000-403fffff : Reserved
40000000-403fffff : pnp 00:00
40400000-80a79fff : System RAM
...
We don't have to look at any children of "0009d000-000fffff : Reserved"
if we can just skip these 15 items directly because the parent range is
not of interest.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210920142856.17758-1-david@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210920142856.17758-2-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The kcov code mixes local_irq_save() and spin_lock() in
kcov_remote_{start|end}(). This creates a warning on PREEMPT_RT because
local_irq_save() disables interrupts and spin_lock_t is turned into a
sleeping lock which can not be acquired in a section with disabled
interrupts.
The kcov_remote_lock is used to synchronize the access to the hash-list
kcov_remote_map. The local_irq_save() block protects access to the
per-CPU data kcov_percpu_data.
There is no compelling reason to change the lock type to raw_spin_lock_t
to make it work with local_irq_save(). Changing it would require to
move memory allocation (in kcov_remote_add()) and deallocation outside
of the locked section.
Adding an unlimited amount of entries to the hashlist will increase the
IRQ-off time during lookup. It could be argued that this is debug code
and the latency does not matter. There is however no need to do so and
it would allow to use this facility in an RT enabled build.
Using a local_lock_t instead of local_irq_save() has the befit of adding
a protection scope within the source which makes it obvious what is
protected. On a !PREEMPT_RT && !LOCKDEP build the local_lock_irqsave()
maps directly to local_irq_save() so there is overhead at runtime.
Replace the local_irq_save() section with a local_lock_t.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210923164741.1859522-6-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210830172627.267989-6-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Reported-by: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
gcc warns about a couple of instances in which a sanity check exists but
the author wasn't sure how to react to it failing, which makes it look
like a possible bug:
fs/hfsplus/inode.c: In function 'hfsplus_cat_read_inode':
fs/hfsplus/inode.c:503:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
503 | /* panic? */;
| ^
fs/hfsplus/inode.c:524:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
524 | /* panic? */;
| ^
fs/hfsplus/inode.c: In function 'hfsplus_cat_write_inode':
fs/hfsplus/inode.c:582:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
582 | /* panic? */;
| ^
fs/hfsplus/inode.c:608:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
608 | /* panic? */;
| ^
fs/hfs/inode.c: In function 'hfs_write_inode':
fs/hfs/inode.c:464:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
464 | /* panic? */;
| ^
fs/hfs/inode.c:485:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
485 | /* panic? */;
| ^
panic() is probably not the correct choice here, but a WARN_ON
seems appropriate and avoids the compile-time warning.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210927102149.1809384-1-arnd@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210322223249.2632268-1-arnd@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The prior message is confusing users, which is the exact opposite of the
goal. If the message is being seen, one of the following situations is
happening:
1. the param is misspelled
2. the param is not valid due to the kernel configuration
3. the param is intended for init but isn't after the '--'
delineator on the command line
To make that more clear to the user, explicitly mention "kernel command
line" and also note that the params are still passed to user space to
avoid causing any alarm over params intended for init.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211013223502.96756-1-ahalaney@redhat.com
Fixes: 86d1919a4f ("init: print out unknown kernel parameters")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
