Atm the allocated MST PBN value is calculated from the TU size (number
of allocated MTP slots) as
PBN = TU * pbn_div
pbn_div being the link BW for each MTP slot. For DP 1.4 link rates this
worked, as pbn_div there is guraranteed to be an integer number, however
on UHBR this isn't the case. To get a PBN, TU pair where TU is a
properly rounded-up value covering all the BW corresponding to PBN,
calculate first PBN and from PBN the TU value.
Calculate PBN directly from the effective pixel data rate, instead of
calculating it indirectly from the corresponding TU and pbn_div values
(which are in turn derived from the pixel data rate and BW overhead).
Add a helper function to calculate the effective data rate, also adding
a note that callers of intel_dp_link_required() may also need to check
the effective data rate (vs. the data rate w/o the BW overhead).
While at it add a note to check if WA#14013163432 is applicable.
v2:
- Fix PBN calculation, deriving it from the effective data rate directly
instead of using the indirect TU and pbn_div values for this.
- Add a note about WA#14013163432. (Arun)
v3:
- Fix rounding up quotient while calculating remote_tu. (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231117150929.1767227-3-imre.deak@intel.com
The next patch will calculate the PBN value directly from the pixel data
rate and the BW allocation overhead, not requiring the data, link M/N
and TU values for this. To prepare for that move the calculation of BW
overheads from intel_dp_mst_compute_m_n() to
intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp().
While at it store link_bpp in a .4 fixed point format.
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231116131841.1588781-8-imre.deak@intel.com
The link M/N ratio is the data rate / link symbol clock rate, fix things
up accordingly. On DP 1.4 this ratio was correct as the link symbol clock
rate in that case matched the link data rate (in bytes/sec units, the
symbol size being 8 bits), however it wasn't correct for UHBR rates
where the symbol size is 32 bits.
Kudos to Arun noticing in Bspec the incorrect use of link data rate in
the ratio's N value.
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231116131841.1588781-7-imre.deak@intel.com
Unfortunately even the HPD based detection added in
commit cfe5bdfb27 ("drm/i915: Check HPD live state during eDP probe")
fails to detect that the VBT's eDP/DDI-A is a ghost on
Asus B360M-A (CFL+CNP). On that board eDP/DDI-A has its HPD
asserted despite nothing being actually connected there :(
The straps/fuses also indicate that the eDP port is present.
So if one boots with a VGA monitor connected the eDP probe will
mistake the DP->VGA converter hooked to DDI-E for an eDP panel
on DDI-A.
As a last resort check what kind of DP device we've detected,
and if it looks like a DP->VGA converter then conclude that
the eDP port should be ignored.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/9636
Fixes: cfe5bdfb27 ("drm/i915: Check HPD live state during eDP probe")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231114142333.15799-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
vlv_dpio_read() and vlv_dpio_write() really operate on the phy, not
pipe. Passing the pipe instead of the phy as parameter is supposed to be
a convenience, but when the caller has the phy, it becomes an
inconvenience. See e.g. chv_dpio_cmn_power_well_enable() and
assert_chv_phy_powergate().
Figure out the phy in the callers, and pass phy to the dpio functions.
v2: retract one overzealous pipe->phy change (Ville)
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231114104534.4180144-3-jani.nikula@intel.com
At least one TGL had regression when using u8 types
for entry setup frames calculation. So, let's switch
to use ints instead.
intel_psr_entry_setup_frames() function expects
to return u8 but since in case of error the error
code -ETIME is returned. This doesn't fit into u8
and hence the return value is not as expected.
Fixes: 2b981d57e4 ("drm/i915/display: Support PSR entry VSC packet to be transmitted one frame earlier")
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231113093737.358137-1-mika.kahola@intel.com
DSC parameter bits_per_pixel is stored in U6.4 format.
The 4 bits represent the fractional part of the bpp.
Currently we use compressed_bpp member of dsc structure to store
only the integral part of the bits_per_pixel.
To store the full bits_per_pixel along with the fractional part,
compressed_bpp is changed to store bpp in U6.4 formats. Intergral
part is retrieved by simply right shifting the member compressed_bpp by 4.
v2:
-Use to_bpp_int, to_bpp_frac_dec, to_bpp_x16 helpers while dealing
with compressed bpp. (Suraj)
-Fix comment styling. (Suraj)
v3:
-Add separate file for 6.4 fixed point helper(Jani, Nikula)
-Add comment for magic values(Suraj)
v4:
-Fix checkpatch warnings caused by renaming(Suraj)
v5:
-Rebase.
-Use existing helpers for conversion of bpp_int to bpp_x16
and vice versa.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231110101020.4067342-3-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
TRANS_DP2_CTL register is programmed to enable panel replay from source
and sink is enabled through panel replay dpcd configuration address.
Bspec: 1407940617
v1: Initial version.
v2:
- Use pr_* flags instead psr_* flags. [Jouni]
- Remove intel_dp_is_edp check as edp1.5 also has panel replay. [Jouni]
v3: Cover letter updated and selective fetch condition check is added
before updating its bit in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL register. [Jouni]
v4: Selective fetch related PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL programmming dropped. [Jouni]
v5: Added PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL programming as needed for Continuous Full
Frame (CFF) update.
v6: Rebased on latest.
Note: Initial plan is to enable panel replay in full-screen live active
frame update mode. In a incremental approach panel replay will be enabled
in selctive update mode if there is any gap in curent implementation.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-6-animesh.manna@intel.com
Modify existing PSR implementation to enable panel replay feature of DP 2.0
which is similar to PSR feature of EDP panel. There is different DPCD
address to check panel capability compare to PSR and vsc sdp header
is different.
v1: Initial version.
v2:
- Set source_panel_replay_support flag under HAS_PANEL_REPLAY()
condition check. [Jouni]
- Code restructured around intel_panel_replay_init
and renamed to intel_panel_replay_init_dpcd. [Jouni]
- Remove the initial code modification around has_psr2 flag. [Jouni]
- Add CAN_PANEL_REPLAY() in intel_encoder_can_psr which is used to
enable in intel_psr_post_plane_update. [Jouni]
v3:
- Initialize both psr and panel-replay. [Jouni]
- Initialize both panel replay and psr if detected. [Jouni]
- Refactoring psr function by introducing _psr_compute_config(). [Jouni]
- Add check for !is_edp while deriving source_panel_replay_support. [Jouni]
- Enable panel replay dpcd initialization in a separate patch. [Jouni]
v4:
- HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() check not needed during sink capability check. [Jouni]
- Set either panel replay source support or psr. [Jouni]
v5:
- HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() removed and use HAS_DP20() instead. [Jouni]
- Move psr related code to intel_psr.c. [Jani]
- Reset sink_panel_replay_support flag during disconnection. [Jani]
v6: return statement restored which is removed by misatke. [Jouni]
v7: cosmetic changes. [Arun]
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-4-animesh.manna@intel.com