Track number of read blocks in the whole filesystem. The counter is
initialized when devices are opened. The counter is increased at
btrfs_submit_dev_bio() if the stats tracking is enabled (depends on the
read policy). Stats tracking is disabled by default and is enabled
through fs_devices::collect_fs_stats when required.
The code is not under the EXPERIMENTAL define, as stats can be expanded
to include write counts and other performance counters, with the user
interface independent of its internal use.
This is an in-memory-only feature, not related to the dev error stats.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Enable specifying additional configuration values along the RAID1
balancing read policy in a single input string.
Update btrfs_read_policy_to_enum() to parse and handle a value
associated with the policy in the format "policy:value", the value part
if present is converted to 64-bit integer.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Introduce btrfs_read_policy_to_enum() helper to simplify the conversion
of a string read policy to its corresponding enum value. This reduces
duplication and improves code clarity in btrfs_read_policy_store().
The parameter is copied locally to allow modification, enabling the
separation of the method and its value. This prepares for the addition of
more functionality in subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Refactor the logic in btrfs_read_policy_show() for easier extension with
more balancing methods. Streamline the space and bracket handling
around the active policy without altering the functional output. This
is in preparation to add more methods.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently, fs_devices->fs_info is initialized in btrfs_init_devices_late(),
but this occurs too late for find_live_mirror(), which is invoked by
load_super_root() much earlier than btrfs_init_devices_late().
Fix this by moving the initialization to open_ctree(), before load_super_root().
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The call to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() at btrfs_setxattr() is not
necessary as we have a path setup for writing with btrfs_search_slot()
having a 'cow' argument set to 1.
This just makes the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The call to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() at btrfs_uuid_tree_add() is not
necessary as we have a path setup for writing with btrfs_search_slot()
having a 'cow' argument set to 1 (through btrfs_insert_empty_item()).
This just makes the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The call to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() at update_raid_extent_item() is not
necessary as we have a path setup for writing with btrfs_search_slot()
having a 'cow' argument set to 1.
This just makes the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The call to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() at btrfs_ioctl_default_subvol() is
not necessary as we have a path setup for writing with btrfs_search_slot()
having a 'cow' argument set to 1.
This just makes the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The call to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() at btrfs_run_dev_replace() is not
necessary as we have a path setup for writing with btrfs_search_slot()
having a 'cow' argument set to 1.
This just makes the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The call to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() at __btrfs_update_delayed_inode() is
not necessary as we have a path setup for writing with btrfs_search_slot()
having a 'cow' argument set to 1.
This just makes the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
ike btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
During renames we are grouping transaction aborts that can be due to a
failure of one of several function calls. While this makes the code less
verbose, it makes it harder to debug as we end up not knowing from which
function call we got an error.
So change this to trigger a transaction abort after each function call
failure, so that when we get a transaction abort message we know exactly
which function call failed, helping us to debug issues.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently btrfs_validate_super() only does a very basic check on the
array chunk size (not too large than the available space, but not too
small to contain no chunk).
The more comprehensive checks (the regular chunk checks and size check
inside the system chunk array) are all done inside btrfs_read_sys_array().
It's not a big deal, but it also means we do not do any validation on
the system chunk array at super block writeback time either.
Do the following modification to centralize the system chunk array
checks into btrfs_validate_super():
- Make chunk_err() helper accept stack chunk pointer
If @leaf parameter is NULL, then the @chunk pointer will be a pointer
to the chunk item, other than the offset inside the leaf.
And since @leaf can be NULL, add a new @fs_info parameter for that
case.
- Make btrfs_check_chunk_valid() handle stack chunk pointer
The same as chunk_err(), a new @fs_info parameter, and if @leaf is
NULL, then @chunk will be a pointer to a stack chunk.
If @chunk is NULL, then all needed btrfs_chunk members will be read
using the stack helper instead of the leaf helper.
This means we need to read out all the needed member at the beginning
of the function.
Furthermore, at super block read time, fs_info->sectorsize is not yet
initialized, we need one extra @sectorsize parameter to grab the
correct sectorsize.
- Introduce a helper validate_sys_chunk_array()
* Validate the disk key.
* Validate the size before we access the full chunk items.
* Do the full chunk item validation.
- Call validate_sys_chunk_array() at btrfs_validate_super()
- Simplify the checks inside btrfs_read_sys_array()
Now the checks will be converted to an ASSERT().
- Simplify the checks inside read_one_chunk()
Now that all chunk items inside system chunk array and chunk tree are
verified, there is no need to verify them again inside read_one_chunk().
This change has the following advantages:
- More comprehensive checks at write time
And unlike the sys_chunk_array read routine, this time we do not need
to allocate a dummy extent buffer to do the check.
All the checks done here require no new memory allocation.
- Slightly improved readability when iterating the system chunk array
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Update tree_insert() to use rb_find_add_cached().
add cmp_refs_node in rb_find_add_cached() to compare.
Since we're here, also make comp_data_refs() and comp_refs() accept
both parameters as const.
Signed-off-by: Roger L. Beckermeyer III <beckerlee3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Update prelim_ref_insert() to use rb_find_add_cached().
There is a special change that the existing prelim_ref_compare() is
called with the first parameter as the existing ref in the rbtree.
But the newer rb_find_add_cached() expects the cmp() function to have
the first parameter as the to-be-added node, thus the new helper
prelim_ref_rb_add_cmp() need to adapt this new order.
Signed-off-by: Roger L. Beckermeyer III <beckerlee3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Adds rb_find_add_cached() as a helper function for use with red-black
trees. Used in btrfs to reduce boilerplate code.
And since it's a new helper, the cmp() function will require both
parameter to be const rb_node pointers.
Suggested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger L. Beckermeyer III <beckerlee3@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The header clearly states that it does not want to be included directly,
only via linux/spinlock_types.h. Drop this as we can simply use the
spinlock.h which is already included.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
During free space tree rebuild, we're holding a transaction handle for
the whole rebuild process.
This can lead to blocked task warning, e.g. btrfs-transaction kthread
(which is already created before btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount()) can be
waked up to join and commit the current transaction.
But the free space tree rebuild process may need to go through thousands
block groups, this will block btrfs-transaction kthread for a long time.
Fix the problem by calling btrfs_should_end_transaction() after each
block group, so that we won't hold the transaction handle too long.
And since the free-space-tree rebuild can be split into
multiple transactions, we need to consider the safety when the rebuild
process is interrupted.
Thankfully since we only set the FREE_SPACE_TREE compat_ro flag without
FREE_SPACE_TREE_VALID flag, even if the rebuild is interrupted, on the
next RW mount, we will still go rebuild the free space tree, by deleting
any items we have and re-starting the rebuild from scratch.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
At btrfs_is_empty_uuid() we have our custom code to check if an uuid is
empty, however there a kernel uuid library that has a function named
uuid_is_null() which does the same and probably more efficient.
So change btrfs_is_empty_uuid() to use uuid_is_null(), which is almost
a directly replacement, it just wraps the necessary casting since our
uuid types are u8 arrays while the uuid kernel library uses the uuid_t
type, which is just a typedef of an u8 array of 16 elements as well.
Also since the function is now to trivial, make it a static inline
function in fs.h.
Suggested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's pointless to have a comment above the prototype declarations of
btrfs_ctree_init() and btrfs_ctree_exit() mentioning that they are
declared in ctree.c. This is from the old days when ctree.h was used
to place anything that didn't fit in any other file. So remove it.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have 3 functions that have their prototypes declared in ctree.h but
they are defined at extent-tree.c and they are unrelated to the btree
data structure. Move the prototypes out of ctree.h and into extent-tree.h.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently btrfs_alloc_write_mask() is defined in ctree.h but it's not
related at all to the btree data structure, so move it into fs.h.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently BTRFS_BYTES_TO_BLKS() is defined in ctree.h but it's not related
at all to the btree data structure, so move it into fs.h.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The folio ordered helper macros are defined at ctree.h but this is not
the best place since ctree.{h,c} is all about the btree data structure
implementation and not a generic module. So move these macros into the
fs.h header.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's a generic helper not specific to ioctls and used in several places,
so move it out from ioctl.c and into fs.c. While at it change its return
type from int to bool and declare the loop variable in the loop itself.
This also slightly reduces the module's size.
Before this change:
$ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
text data bss dec hex filename
1781492 161037 16920 1959449 1de619 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
After this change:
$ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
text data bss dec hex filename
1781340 161037 16920 1959297 1de581 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The declarations for the exclusive operation functions are located at fs.h
but their definitions are in ioctl.c, which doesn't make much sense since
(most of them) are used in several files other than ioctl.c. Since they
are used in several files and they are generic enough, move them out of
ioctl.c and into fs.c, even the ones that are currently only used at
ioctl.c, for the sake of having them all in the same C file.
This also reduces the module's size.
Before this change:
$ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
text data bss dec hex filename
1782094 161045 16920 1960059 1de87b fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
After this change:
$ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
text data bss dec hex filename
1781492 161037 16920 1959449 1de619 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The ctree module is about the implementation of the btree data structure
and not a place holder for generic filesystem things like the csum
algorithm details. Move the functions related to the csum algorithm
details away from ctree.c and into fs.c, which is a far better place for
them. Also fix missing punctuation in comments and change one multiline
comment to a single line comment since everything fits in under 80
characters.
For some reason this also slightly reduces the module's size.
Before this change:
$ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
text data bss dec hex filename
1782126 161045 16920 1960091 1de89b fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
After this change:
$ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
text data bss dec hex filename
1782094 161045 16920 1960059 1de87b fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function abort_should_print_stack() is declared in transaction.h but
its definition is in ctree.c, which doesn't make sense since ctree.c is
the btree implementation and the function is related to the transaction
code. Move its definition into transaction.h as an inline function since
it's a very short and trivial function, and also add the 'btrfs_' prefix
into its name.
This change also reduces the module size.
Before this change:
$ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
text data bss dec hex filename
1783148 161137 16920 1961205 1decf5 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
After this change:
$ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
text data bss dec hex filename
1782126 161045 16920 1960091 1de89b fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that we have the stripe tree decision saved in struct
btrfs_io_geometry we can pass it into is_single_device_io() and get rid of
another call to btrfs_need_raid_stripe_tree_update().
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cache the decision if a particular I/O needs to update RAID stripe tree
entries in struct btrfs_io_context.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cache the return of btrfs_need_stripe_tree_update() in struct
btrfs_io_geometry starting from btrfs_map_block().
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We should always call check_delayed_ref() with a path having a locked leaf
from the extent tree where either the extent item is located or where it
should be located in case it doesn't exist yet (when there's a pending
unflushed delayed ref to do it), as we need to lock any existing delayed
ref head while holding such leaf locked in order to avoid races with
flushing delayed references, which could make us think an extent is not
shared when it really is.
So add some assertions and a comment about such expectations to
btrfs_cross_ref_exist(), which is the only caller of check_delayed_ref().
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are some not immediately obvious details about the operation of
check_committed_ref(), namely that when it returns 0 it must return with
the path having a locked leaf from the extent tree that contains the
extent's extent item, so that we can later check for delayed refs when
calling check_delayed_ref() in a way that doesn't race with a task running
delayed references. For similar reasons, it must also return with a locked
leaf when the extent item is not found, and that leaf is where the extent
item should be located, because we may have delayed references that are
going to create the extent item. Also document that the function can
return false positives in order to not be too slow, and that the most
important is to not return false negatives.
So add a function comment to check_committed_ref().
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
