clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call. We are way better off to have explicit
calls instead of this monstrosity.
Split out the broadcast control into a separate function and
provide inline helpers. Switch clockevents_notify() over. This
will go away once all callers are converted.
This also gets rid of the nested locking of clockevents_lock and
broadcast_lock. The broadcast control functions do not require
clockevents_lock. Only the managing functions
(setup/shutdown/suspend/resume of the broadcast device require
clockevents_lock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8086559.ttsuS0n1Xr@vostro.rjw.lan
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
While looking through the (ab)use of the clockevents_notify()
function I stumbled over the following gem in the acpi_pad code:
if (lapic_detected_unstable && !lapic_marked_unstable) {
/* LAPIC could halt in idle, so notify users */
for_each_online_cpu(i)
clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ON, &i);
lapic_marked_unstable = 1;
}
This code calls on the cpu which detects the lapic unstable
condition first clockevents_notify() to tell the core code that
the broadcast should be enabled on all online cpus. Brilliant
stuff that as it notifies the core code a num_online_cpus()
times that the broadcast should be enabled on the current cpu.
This probably has never been noticed because that code got never
tested with NOHZ=n and HIGHRES_TIMER=n or it just worked by
chance because one of the other mechanisms told the core in the
right way that the local apic timer is wreckaged.
Sigh, this is:
- The 4th incarnation of idle drivers which has their own mechanism
to detect and deal with X86_FEATURE_ARAT.
- The 2nd incarnation of fake idle mechanisms with a different set of
brainmelting bugs.
- Has been merged against an explicit NAK of the scheduler
maintainer with the promise to improve it over time.
- Another example of featuritis driven trainwreck engineering.
- Another pointless waste of my time.
Fix this nonsense by removing that lapic detection and
notification logic and simply call into the clockevents code
unconditonally. The ARAT feature is marked in the lapic
clockevent already so the core code will just ignore the
requests and return.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1887788.RObRuI4tSv@vostro.rjw.lan
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
If a system does not provide a persistent_clock(), the time
will be updated on resume by rtc_resume(). With the addition
of the non-stop clocksources for suspend timing, those systems
set the time on resume in timekeeping_resume(), but may not
provide a valid persistent_clock().
This results in the rtc_resume() logic thinking no one has set
the time and it then will over-write the suspend time again,
which is not necessary and only increases clock error.
So, fix this for rtc_resume().
This patch also improves the name of persistent_clock_exist to
make it more grammatical.
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427945681-29972-19-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
When there's no persistent clock, normally
timekeeping_suspend_time should always be zero, but this can
break in timekeeping_suspend().
At T1, there was a system suspend, so old_delta was assigned T1.
After some time, one time adjustment happened, and xtime got the
value of T1-dt(0s<dt<2s). Then, there comes another system
suspend soon after this adjustment, obviously we will get a
small negative delta_delta, resulting in a negative
timekeeping_suspend_time.
This is problematic, when doing timekeeping_resume() if there is
no nonstop clocksource for example, it will hit the else leg and
inject the improper sleeptime which is the wrong logic.
So, we can solve this problem by only doing delta related code
when the persistent clock is existent. Actually the code only
makes sense for persistent clock cases.
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427945681-29972-18-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
As part of addressing in-kernel y2038 issues, this patch adds
update_persistent_clock64() and replaces all the call sites of
update_persistent_clock() with this function. This is a __weak
implementation, which simply calls the existing y2038 unsafe
update_persistent_clock().
This allows architecture specific implementations to be
converted independently, and eventually y2038-unsafe
update_persistent_clock() can be removed after all its
architecture specific implementations have been converted to
update_persistent_clock64().
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427945681-29972-4-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
As part of addressing in-kernel y2038 issues, this patch adds
read_persistent_clock64() and replaces all the call sites of
read_persistent_clock() with this function. This is a __weak
implementation, which simply calls the existing y2038 unsafe
read_persistent_clock().
This allows architecture specific implementations to be
converted independently, and eventually the y2038 unsafe
read_persistent_clock() can be removed after all its
architecture specific implementations have been converted to
read_persistent_clock64().
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427945681-29972-3-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
As part of addressing in-kernel y2038 issues, this patch adds
read_boot_clock64() and replaces all the call sites of
read_boot_clock() with this function. This is a __weak
implementation, which simply calls the existing y2038 unsafe
read_boot_clock().
This allows architecture specific implementations to be
converted independently, and eventually the y2038 unsafe
read_boot_clock() can be removed after all its architecture
specific implementations have been converted to
read_boot_clock64().
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427945681-29972-2-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Memory for the 'tvec_base' array is allocated separately for the boot CPU (statically)
and non-boot CPUs (dynamically).
The reason is because __TIMER_INITIALIZER() needs to set ->base to a
valid pointer (because we've made NULL special, hint: lock_timer_base())
and we cannot get a compile time pointer to per-cpu entries because we
don't know where we'll map the section, even for the boot cpu.
This can be simplified a bit by statically allocating per-cpu memory.
The only disadvantage is that memory for one of the structures will stay
unused, i.e. for the boot CPU, which uses boot_tvec_bases.
This will also guarantee that tvec_base is cacheline aligned. Even
though tvec_base has ____cacheline_aligned stuck on, kzalloc_node() does
not actually respect that (but guarantees a minimum u64 alignment).
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/17cdf560f2727f687ab159707d0aa591f8a2f82d.1427814611.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
It was found when doing a hotplug stress test on POWER, that the
machine either hit softlockups or rcu_sched stall warnings. The
issue was traced to commit:
7cba160ad7 ("powernv/cpuidle: Redesign idle states management")
which exposed the cpu_down() race with hrtimer based broadcast mode:
5d1638acb9 ("tick: Introduce hrtimer based broadcast")
The race is the following:
Assume CPU1 is the CPU which holds the hrtimer broadcasting duty
before it is taken down.
CPU0 CPU1
cpu_down() take_cpu_down()
disable_interrupts()
cpu_die()
while (CPU1 != CPU_DEAD) {
msleep(100);
switch_to_idle();
stop_cpu_timer();
schedule_broadcast();
}
tick_cleanup_cpu_dead()
take_over_broadcast()
So after CPU1 disabled interrupts it cannot handle the broadcast
hrtimer anymore, so CPU0 will be stuck forever.
Fix this by explicitly taking over broadcast duty before cpu_die().
This is a temporary workaround. What we really want is a callback
in the clockevent device which allows us to do that from the dying
CPU by pushing the hrtimer onto a different cpu. That might involve
an IPI and is definitely more complex than this immediate fix.
Changelog was picked up from:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/16/213
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Preeti U. Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Fixes: http://linuxppc.10917.n7.nabble.com/offlining-cpus-breakage-td88619.html
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150330092410.24979.59887.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.com
[ Merged it to the latest timer tree, renamed the callback, tidied up the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Do various cleanups on the clockchips.h file:
- indent preprocessor blocks to make it more clear which block we are in,
this also makes merge resolution easier
- comment larger preprocessor blocks consistently, using the:
#if FOO
...
#else /* !FOO: */
...
#endif /* !FOO */
notation.
- unbreak lines
- etc.
No change in functionality.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Move the broadcasting related section to the GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS=y
section - this also solves build failures on architectures that
don't use generic clockevents yet.
Also standardize include file style to make it easier to read, and
use nesting depth aware preprocessor directives to make future merges
easier.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Use the new tick_suspend/resume_local() and get rid of the
homebrewn implementation of these in the ARM bL switcher. The
check for the cpumask is completely pointless. There is no harm
to suspend a per cpu tick device unconditionally. If that's a
real issue then we fix it proper at the core level and not with
some completely undocumented hacks in some random core code.
Move the tick internals to the core code, now that this nuisance
is gone.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ rjw: Rebase, changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1655112.Ws17YsMfN7@vostro.rjw.lan
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Xen calls on every cpu into tick_resume() which is just wrong.
tick_resume() is for the syscore global suspend/resume
invocation. What XEN really wants is a per cpu local resume
function.
Provide a tick_resume_local() function and use it in XEN.
Also provide a complementary tick_suspend_local() and modify
tick_unfreeze() and tick_freeze(), respectively, to use the
new local tick resume/suspend functions.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Combined two patches, rebased, modified subject/changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1698741.eezk9tnXtG@vostro.rjw.lan
[ Merged to latest timers/core. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the
clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism,
it's a multiplex call.
We are way better off to have explicit calls instead of this
monstrosity. Split out the suspend/resume() calls and invoke
them directly from the call sites.
No locking required at this point because these calls happen
with interrupts disabled and a single cpu online.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Rebased on top of 4.0-rc5. ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/713674030.jVm1qaHuPf@vostro.rjw.lan
[ Rebased on top of latest timers/core. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Pull ARM SoC fixes from Olof Johansson:
"The latest and greatest fixes for ARM platform code. Worth pointing
out are:
- Lines-wise, largest is a PXA fix for dealing with interrupts on DT
that was quite broken. It's still newish code so while we could
have held this off, it seemed appropriate to include now
- Some GPIO fixes for OMAP platforms added a few lines. This was
also fixes for code recently added (this release).
- Small OMAP timer fix to behave better with partially upstreamed
platforms, which is quite welcome.
- Allwinner fixes about operating point control, reducing
overclocking in some cases for better stability.
plus a handful of other smaller fixes across the map"
* tag 'armsoc-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc:
arm64: juno: Fix misleading name of UART reference clock
ARM: dts: sunxi: Remove overclocked/overvoltaged OPP
ARM: dts: sun4i: a10-lime: Override and remove 1008MHz OPP setting
ARM: socfpga: dts: fix spi1 interrupt
ARM: dts: Fix gpio interrupts for dm816x
ARM: dts: dra7: remove ti,hwmod property from pcie phy
ARM: OMAP: dmtimer: disable pm runtime on remove
ARM: OMAP: dmtimer: check for pm_runtime_get_sync() failure
ARM: OMAP2+: Fix socbus family info for AM33xx devices
ARM: dts: omap3: Add missing dmas for crypto
ARM: dts: rockchip: disable gmac by default in rk3288.dtsi
MAINTAINERS: add rockchip regexp to the ARM/Rockchip entry
ARM: pxa: fix pxa interrupts handling in DT
ARM: pxa: Fix typo in zeus.c
ARM: sunxi: Have ARCH_SUNXI select RESET_CONTROLLER for clock driver usage
