Merge branch 'docs-netdev-a-couple-of-updates'

Paolo Abeni says:

====================
docs: netdev: a couple of updates

Explicitly covers a couple of relevant spots currently left out in the
dark. Likely the first one was too obvious to ever spell out loud and
the latter too new.

Both cases are increasingly relevant, at least to me.

Keep the update in the netdev subsystem, as others may have slightly
different preferences.
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/cover.1784884817.git.pabeni@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst

@@ -203,6 +203,22 @@ For RFC postings specifically, if nobody responded in a week - reviewers
 either missed the posting or have no strong opinions. If the code is ready,
 repost as a PATCH.
 
+There are 2 services actively providing LLM-generated review on posted patches:
+
+- https://sashiko.dev/
+- https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/
+
+both use the Sashiko infrastructure on top of different models. Reviews are
+available after 24h. Patch authors are expected to proactively look into the
+AI-generated reviews and handle such feedback as any other kind of review:
+either debate it or address it. In both cases a reply on the mailing list is
+expected.
+
+Authors are strongly encouraged to run LLM reviews on the posted patches in
+advance of the actual post. Large series triggering a significant amount of
+AI-generated feedback will likely get little attention from maintainers and
+reviewers.
+
 Emails saying just "ping" or "bump" are considered rude. If you can't figure
 out the status of the patch from patchwork or where the discussion has
 landed - describe your best guess and ask if it's correct. For example::
@@ -210,6 +226,10 @@ landed - describe your best guess and ask if it's correct. For example::
   I don't understand what the next steps are. Person X seems to be unhappy
   with A, should I do B and repost the patches?
 
+Don't reach out to maintainers or reviewers via private email and/or other
+communications channels: all the discussion must remain public, and
+requesting special attention is unfair towards the community, at best.
+
 .. _Changes requested:
 
 Changes requested