mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-16 19:31:42 -04:00
Merge branch 'bpf-support-bpf_get_func_arg-for-bpf_trace_raw_tp'
Menglong Dong says: ==================== bpf: support bpf_get_func_arg() for BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP Support bpf_get_func_arg() for BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP by getting the function argument count from "prog->aux->attach_func_proto" during verifier inline. Changes v5 -> v4: * some format adjustment in the 1st patch * v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260120073046.324342-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/ Changes v4 -> v3: * fix the error of using bpf_get_func_arg() for BPF_TRACE_ITER * v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260119023732.130642-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/ Changes v3 -> v2: * remove unnecessary NULL checking for prog->aux->attach_func_proto * v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260116071739.121182-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/ Changes v2 -> v1: * for nr_args, skip first 'void *__data' argument in btf_trace_##name typedef * check the result4 and result5 in the selftests * v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260116035024.98214-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/ ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260121044348.113201-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -23741,8 +23741,15 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
|
||||
/* Implement bpf_get_func_arg inline. */
|
||||
if (prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
|
||||
insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_func_arg) {
|
||||
/* Load nr_args from ctx - 8 */
|
||||
insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8);
|
||||
if (eatype == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP) {
|
||||
int nr_args = btf_type_vlen(prog->aux->attach_func_proto);
|
||||
|
||||
/* skip 'void *__data' in btf_trace_##name() and save to reg0 */
|
||||
insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, nr_args - 1);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* Load nr_args from ctx - 8 */
|
||||
insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8);
|
||||
}
|
||||
insn_buf[1] = BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, 6);
|
||||
insn_buf[2] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_2, 3);
|
||||
insn_buf[3] = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1);
|
||||
@@ -23794,8 +23801,15 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
|
||||
/* Implement get_func_arg_cnt inline. */
|
||||
if (prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
|
||||
insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_func_arg_cnt) {
|
||||
/* Load nr_args from ctx - 8 */
|
||||
insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8);
|
||||
if (eatype == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP) {
|
||||
int nr_args = btf_type_vlen(prog->aux->attach_func_proto);
|
||||
|
||||
/* skip 'void *__data' in btf_trace_##name() and save to reg0 */
|
||||
insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, nr_args - 1);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* Load nr_args from ctx - 8 */
|
||||
insn_buf[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, 1);
|
||||
if (!new_prog)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1734,11 +1734,17 @@ tracing_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
|
||||
case BPF_FUNC_d_path:
|
||||
return &bpf_d_path_proto;
|
||||
case BPF_FUNC_get_func_arg:
|
||||
return bpf_prog_has_trampoline(prog) ? &bpf_get_func_arg_proto : NULL;
|
||||
if (bpf_prog_has_trampoline(prog) ||
|
||||
prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP)
|
||||
return &bpf_get_func_arg_proto;
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
case BPF_FUNC_get_func_ret:
|
||||
return bpf_prog_has_trampoline(prog) ? &bpf_get_func_ret_proto : NULL;
|
||||
case BPF_FUNC_get_func_arg_cnt:
|
||||
return bpf_prog_has_trampoline(prog) ? &bpf_get_func_arg_cnt_proto : NULL;
|
||||
if (bpf_prog_has_trampoline(prog) ||
|
||||
prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP)
|
||||
return &bpf_get_func_arg_cnt_proto;
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
case BPF_FUNC_get_attach_cookie:
|
||||
if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
|
||||
prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -33,11 +33,14 @@ void test_get_func_args_test(void)
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval >> 16, 1, "test_run");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval & 0xffff, 1234 + 29, "test_run");
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(1), "trigger_read");
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test1_result, 1, "test1_result");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test2_result, 1, "test2_result");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test3_result, 1, "test3_result");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test4_result, 1, "test4_result");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test5_result, 1, "test5_result");
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test6_result, 1, "test6_result");
|
||||
|
||||
cleanup:
|
||||
get_func_args_test__destroy(skel);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -121,3 +121,47 @@ int BPF_PROG(fexit_test, int _a, int *_b, int _ret)
|
||||
test4_result &= err == 0 && ret == 1234;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__u64 test5_result = 0;
|
||||
SEC("tp_btf/bpf_testmod_fentry_test1_tp")
|
||||
int BPF_PROG(tp_test1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__u64 cnt = bpf_get_func_arg_cnt(ctx);
|
||||
__u64 a = 0, z = 0;
|
||||
__s64 err;
|
||||
|
||||
test5_result = cnt == 1;
|
||||
|
||||
err = bpf_get_func_arg(ctx, 0, &a);
|
||||
test5_result &= err == 0 && ((int) a == 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* not valid argument */
|
||||
err = bpf_get_func_arg(ctx, 1, &z);
|
||||
test5_result &= err == -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__u64 test6_result = 0;
|
||||
SEC("tp_btf/bpf_testmod_fentry_test2_tp")
|
||||
int BPF_PROG(tp_test2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__u64 cnt = bpf_get_func_arg_cnt(ctx);
|
||||
__u64 a = 0, b = 0, z = 0;
|
||||
__s64 err;
|
||||
|
||||
test6_result = cnt == 2;
|
||||
|
||||
/* valid arguments */
|
||||
err = bpf_get_func_arg(ctx, 0, &a);
|
||||
test6_result &= err == 0 && (int) a == 2;
|
||||
|
||||
err = bpf_get_func_arg(ctx, 1, &b);
|
||||
test6_result &= err == 0 && b == 3;
|
||||
|
||||
/* not valid argument */
|
||||
err = bpf_get_func_arg(ctx, 2, &z);
|
||||
test6_result &= err == -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -63,6 +63,16 @@ BPF_TESTMOD_DECLARE_TRACE(bpf_testmod_test_writable_bare,
|
||||
sizeof(struct bpf_testmod_test_writable_ctx)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
DECLARE_TRACE(bpf_testmod_fentry_test1,
|
||||
TP_PROTO(int a),
|
||||
TP_ARGS(a)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
DECLARE_TRACE(bpf_testmod_fentry_test2,
|
||||
TP_PROTO(int a, u64 b),
|
||||
TP_ARGS(a, b)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_EVENTS_H */
|
||||
|
||||
#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -412,11 +412,15 @@ __weak noinline struct file *bpf_testmod_return_ptr(int arg)
|
||||
|
||||
noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test1(int a)
|
||||
{
|
||||
trace_bpf_testmod_fentry_test1_tp(a);
|
||||
|
||||
return a + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test2(int a, u64 b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
trace_bpf_testmod_fentry_test2_tp(a, b);
|
||||
|
||||
return a + b;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user