net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: clean up PTP clock during setup failure

If an error occurs during mv88e6xxx_setup() and the PTP clock has been
registered, the clock will not be unregistered as mv88e6xxx_ptp_free()
will not be called. mv88e6xxx_hwtstamp_free() also is not called.

As mv88e6xxx_ptp_free() can cope with being called without a successful
call to mv88e6xxx_ptp_setup(), and mv88e6xxx_hwtstamp_free() is empty,
add both these *_free() calls to the error cleanup paths in
mv88e6xxx_setup().

Moreover, mv88e6xxx_teardown() should teardown setup done in
mv88e6xxx_setup() - see dsa_switch_setup(). However, instead *_free()
are called from mv88e6xxx_remove() function that is only called when a
device is unbound, which omits cleanup should a failure occur later in
dsa_switch_setup(). Move the *_free() calls from mv88e6xxx_remove() to
mv88e6xxx_teardown().

Note that mv88e6xxx_ptp_setup() must be called holding the reg_lock,
but mv88e6xxx_ptp_free() must never be. This is especially true after
commit "ptp: rework ptp_clock_unregister() to disable events". This
patch does not change this, but adds a comment to that effect.

Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/E1uy84w-00000005Spi-46iF@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-15 13:13:06 +01:00
committed by Jakub Kicinski
parent 3ea308da69
commit c94ef36ec9
2 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@@ -3965,6 +3965,8 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds)
mv88e6xxx_teardown_devlink_params(ds);
dsa_devlink_resources_unregister(ds);
mv88e6xxx_teardown_devlink_regions_global(ds);
mv88e6xxx_hwtstamp_free(chip);
mv88e6xxx_ptp_free(chip);
mv88e6xxx_mdios_unregister(chip);
}
@@ -4105,7 +4107,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
mv88e6xxx_reg_unlock(chip);
if (err)
goto out_mdios;
goto out_hwtstamp;
/* Have to be called without holding the register lock, since
* they take the devlink lock, and we later take the locks in
@@ -4114,7 +4116,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
*/
err = mv88e6xxx_setup_devlink_resources(ds);
if (err)
goto out_mdios;
goto out_hwtstamp;
err = mv88e6xxx_setup_devlink_params(ds);
if (err)
@@ -4130,7 +4132,9 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
mv88e6xxx_teardown_devlink_params(ds);
out_resources:
dsa_devlink_resources_unregister(ds);
out_mdios:
out_hwtstamp:
mv88e6xxx_hwtstamp_free(chip);
mv88e6xxx_ptp_free(chip);
mv88e6xxx_mdios_unregister(chip);
return err;
@@ -7439,11 +7443,6 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_remove(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
chip = ds->priv;
if (chip->info->ptp_support) {
mv88e6xxx_hwtstamp_free(chip);
mv88e6xxx_ptp_free(chip);
}
mv88e6xxx_unregister_switch(chip);
mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_prob_irq_free(chip);

View File

@@ -551,6 +551,7 @@ int mv88e6xxx_ptp_setup(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
return 0;
}
/* This must never be called holding the register lock */
void mv88e6xxx_ptp_free(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
{
if (chip->ptp_clock) {