mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-10 23:33:01 -04:00
Merge patch series "pidfs: ensure consistent ENOENT/ESRCH reporting"
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> says: In a prior patch series we tried to cleanly differentiate between: (1) The task has already been reaped. (2) The caller requested a pidfd for a thread-group leader but the pid actually references a struct pid that isn't used as a thread-group leader. as this was causing issues for non-threaded workloads. But there's cases where the current simple logic is wrong. Specifically, if the pid was a leader pid and the check races with __unhash_process(). Stabilize this by using the pidfd waitqueue lock. * patches from https://lore.kernel.org/20250411-work-pidfs-enoent-v2-0-60b2d3bb545f@kernel.org: pidfs: ensure consistent ENOENT/ESRCH reporting exit: move wake_up_all() pidfd waiters into __unhash_process() Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250411-work-pidfs-enoent-v2-0-60b2d3bb545f@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -133,8 +133,13 @@ struct release_task_post {
|
||||
static void __unhash_process(struct release_task_post *post, struct task_struct *p,
|
||||
bool group_dead)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct pid *pid = task_pid(p);
|
||||
|
||||
nr_threads--;
|
||||
|
||||
detach_pid(post->pids, p, PIDTYPE_PID);
|
||||
wake_up_all(&pid->wait_pidfd);
|
||||
|
||||
if (group_dead) {
|
||||
detach_pid(post->pids, p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
|
||||
detach_pid(post->pids, p, PIDTYPE_PGID);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2108,27 +2108,25 @@ static int __pidfd_prepare(struct pid *pid, unsigned int flags, struct file **re
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int pidfd_prepare(struct pid *pid, unsigned int flags, struct file **ret)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int err = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!(flags & PIDFD_THREAD)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If this is struct pid isn't used as a thread-group
|
||||
* leader pid but the caller requested to create a
|
||||
* thread-group leader pidfd then report ENOENT to the
|
||||
* caller as a hint.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!pid_has_task(pid, PIDTYPE_TGID))
|
||||
err = -ENOENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If this wasn't a thread-group leader struct pid or the task
|
||||
* got reaped in the meantime report -ESRCH to userspace.
|
||||
* While holding the pidfd waitqueue lock removing the task
|
||||
* linkage for the thread-group leader pid (PIDTYPE_TGID) isn't
|
||||
* possible. Thus, if there's still task linkage for PIDTYPE_PID
|
||||
* not having thread-group leader linkage for the pid means it
|
||||
* wasn't a thread-group leader in the first place.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!pid_has_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID))
|
||||
err = -ESRCH;
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
scoped_guard(spinlock_irq, &pid->wait_pidfd.lock) {
|
||||
/* Task has already been reaped. */
|
||||
if (!pid_has_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID))
|
||||
return -ESRCH;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If this struct pid isn't used as a thread-group
|
||||
* leader but the caller requested to create a
|
||||
* thread-group leader pidfd then report ENOENT.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!(flags & PIDFD_THREAD) && !pid_has_task(pid, PIDTYPE_TGID))
|
||||
return -ENOENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return __pidfd_prepare(pid, flags, ret);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -359,11 +359,6 @@ static void __change_pid(struct pid **pids, struct task_struct *task,
|
||||
hlist_del_rcu(&task->pid_links[type]);
|
||||
*pid_ptr = new;
|
||||
|
||||
if (type == PIDTYPE_PID) {
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(pid_has_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID));
|
||||
wake_up_all(&pid->wait_pidfd);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (tmp = PIDTYPE_MAX; --tmp >= 0; )
|
||||
if (pid_has_task(pid, tmp))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user