drm/ttm: Issue direct reclaim at beneficial_order

Triggering kswap at an order higher than beneficial_order makes little
sense, as the driver has already indicated the optimal order at which
reclaim is effective. Similarly, issuing direct reclaim or triggering
kswap at a lower order than beneficial_order is ineffective, since the
driver does not benefit from reclaiming lower-order pages.

As a result, direct reclaim should only be issued with __GFP_NORETRY at
exactly beneficial_order, or as a fallback, direct reclaim without
__GFP_NORETRY at order 0 when failure is not an option.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260612225757.3844350-1-matthew.brost@intel.com
This commit is contained in:
Matthew Brost
2026-06-12 15:57:57 -07:00
parent 2afdfc658f
commit a56a73ec85

View File

@@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static struct page *ttm_pool_alloc_page(struct ttm_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp_flags,
* Do not add latency to the allocation path for allocations orders
* device tolds us do not bring them additional performance gains.
*/
if (beneficial_order && order > beneficial_order)
gfp_flags &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
if (order && beneficial_order && order != beneficial_order)
gfp_flags &= ~__GFP_RECLAIM;
if (!ttm_pool_uses_dma_alloc(pool)) {
p = alloc_pages_node(pool->nid, gfp_flags, order);