mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-09 23:48:56 -04:00
md/raid5: avoid device_lock in read_one_chunk()
There is a lock contention on device_lock in read_one_chunk().
device_lock is taken to sync conf->active_aligned_reads and
conf->quiesce.
read_one_chunk() takes the lock, then waits for quiesce=0 (resumed)
before incrementing active_aligned_reads.
raid5_quiesce() takes the lock, sets quiesce=2 (in-progress), then waits
for active_aligned_reads to be zero before setting quiesce=1
(suspended).
Introduce a fast (lockless) path in read_one_chunk(): activate aligned
read without taking device_lock. In case quiesce starts while
activating the aligned-read in fast path, deactivate it and revert to
old behavior (take device_lock and wait for quiesce to finish).
Add smp store/load in raid5_quiesce()/read_one_chunk() respectively to
gaurantee that read_one_chunk() does not miss an ongoing quiesce.
My setups:
1. 8 local nvme drives (each up to 250k iops).
2. 8 ram disks (brd).
Each setup with raid6 (6+2), 1024 io threads on a 96 cpu-cores (48 per
socket) system. Record both iops and cpu spent on this contention with
rand-read-4k. Record bw with sequential-read-128k. Note: in most cases
cpu is still busy but due to "new" bottlenecks.
nvme:
| iops | cpu | bw
-----------------------------------------------
without patch | 1.6M | ~50% | 5.5GB/s
with patch | 2M (throttled) | 0% | 16GB/s (throttled)
ram (brd):
| iops | cpu | bw
-----------------------------------------------
without patch | 2M | ~80% | 24GB/s
with patch | 4M | 0% | 55GB/s
CC: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
CC: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Gal Ofri <gal.ofri@storing.io>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5403,6 +5403,7 @@ static int raid5_read_one_chunk(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *raid_bio)
|
||||
sector_t sector, end_sector, first_bad;
|
||||
int bad_sectors, dd_idx;
|
||||
struct md_io_acct *md_io_acct;
|
||||
bool did_inc;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!in_chunk_boundary(mddev, raid_bio)) {
|
||||
pr_debug("%s: non aligned\n", __func__);
|
||||
@@ -5454,11 +5455,24 @@ static int raid5_read_one_chunk(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *raid_bio)
|
||||
/* No reshape active, so we can trust rdev->data_offset */
|
||||
align_bio->bi_iter.bi_sector += rdev->data_offset;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
|
||||
wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_for_quiescent, conf->quiesce == 0,
|
||||
conf->device_lock);
|
||||
atomic_inc(&conf->active_aligned_reads);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
|
||||
did_inc = false;
|
||||
if (conf->quiesce == 0) {
|
||||
atomic_inc(&conf->active_aligned_reads);
|
||||
did_inc = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* need a memory barrier to detect the race with raid5_quiesce() */
|
||||
if (!did_inc || smp_load_acquire(&conf->quiesce) != 0) {
|
||||
/* quiesce is in progress, so we need to undo io activation and wait
|
||||
* for it to finish
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (did_inc && atomic_dec_and_test(&conf->active_aligned_reads))
|
||||
wake_up(&conf->wait_for_quiescent);
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
|
||||
wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_for_quiescent, conf->quiesce == 0,
|
||||
conf->device_lock);
|
||||
atomic_inc(&conf->active_aligned_reads);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (mddev->gendisk)
|
||||
trace_block_bio_remap(align_bio, disk_devt(mddev->gendisk),
|
||||
@@ -8346,7 +8360,10 @@ static void raid5_quiesce(struct mddev *mddev, int quiesce)
|
||||
* active stripes can drain
|
||||
*/
|
||||
r5c_flush_cache(conf, INT_MAX);
|
||||
conf->quiesce = 2;
|
||||
/* need a memory barrier to make sure read_one_chunk() sees
|
||||
* quiesce started and reverts to slow (locked) path.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_store_release(&conf->quiesce, 2);
|
||||
wait_event_cmd(conf->wait_for_quiescent,
|
||||
atomic_read(&conf->active_stripes) == 0 &&
|
||||
atomic_read(&conf->active_aligned_reads) == 0,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user