pmdomain: qcom: rpmhpd: Skip retention by default

Retention is very rarely an operational corner. In the majority of
cases, HW cannot operate properly at Retention levels and so the minimum
operational level when enabling a rail is the first corner above
Retention. A small subset of always-on use cases can operate at
Retention, but those aren't controlled from HLOS.

Currently, we allow Retention by default and only disallow it special
cases. But this leaves us open to various failures when the PD is
enabled without first being voted to an OPP above Retention. Such as
when a child GDSC PD requests to enable its parent RPMh PD. In this
case, the GDSC would get stuck powering on.

Newer chips have started supporting Retention on rails that didn't
previously (such as for MMCX). Instead of adding more special cases to
skip Retention on MMCX, start skipping Retention by default since it's
almost never desired from an HLOS perspective.

Signed-off-by: Mike Tipton <mike.tipton@oss.qualcomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulfh@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Mike Tipton
2026-06-29 13:33:36 -07:00
committed by Ulf Hansson
parent a1d9d3b958
commit 7178817f19

View File

@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@
* @addr: Resource address as looped up using resource name from
* cmd-db
* @state_synced: Indicator that sync_state has been invoked for the rpmhpd resource
* @skip_retention_level: Indicate that retention level should not be used for the power domain
*/
struct rpmhpd {
struct device *dev;
@@ -58,7 +57,6 @@ struct rpmhpd {
const char *res_name;
u32 addr;
bool state_synced;
bool skip_retention_level;
};
struct rpmhpd_desc {
@@ -191,7 +189,6 @@ static struct rpmhpd mxc = {
.pd = { .name = "mxc", },
.peer = &mxc_ao,
.res_name = "mxc.lvl",
.skip_retention_level = true,
};
static struct rpmhpd mxc_ao = {
@@ -199,7 +196,6 @@ static struct rpmhpd mxc_ao = {
.active_only = true,
.peer = &mxc,
.res_name = "mxc.lvl",
.skip_retention_level = true,
};
static struct rpmhpd nsp = {
@@ -1093,7 +1089,15 @@ static int rpmhpd_update_level_mapping(struct rpmhpd *rpmhpd)
return -EINVAL;
for (i = 0; i < rpmhpd->level_count; i++) {
if (rpmhpd->skip_retention_level && buf[i] == RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_RETENTION)
/*
* Most HW won't function properly at Retention. The minimum
* operational level is the first level above Retention. The
* small subset of HW that can operate at Retention isn't
* controlled by HLOS. Skip the Retention level to avoid HW
* failures when the PD is enabled without first having an
* explicit OPP level set.
*/
if (buf[i] == RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_RETENTION)
continue;
rpmhpd->level[i] = buf[i];