power: supply: bq27xxx: Switch to a simpler IDA interface

We don't need to specify any ranges when allocating IDs so we can switch
to ida_alloc() and ida_free() instead of the ida_simple_ counterparts.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240123150914.308510-1-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Davis
2024-01-23 09:09:10 -06:00
committed by Sebastian Reichel
parent 6613476e22
commit 67d85ee4bc

View File

@@ -13,8 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/power/bq27xxx_battery.h>
static DEFINE_IDR(battery_id);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(battery_mutex);
static DEFINE_IDA(battery_id);
static irqreturn_t bq27xxx_battery_irq_handler_thread(int irq, void *data)
{
@@ -145,9 +144,7 @@ static int bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
int num;
/* Get new ID for the new battery device */
mutex_lock(&battery_mutex);
num = idr_alloc(&battery_id, client, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
mutex_unlock(&battery_mutex);
num = ida_alloc(&battery_id, GFP_KERNEL);
if (num < 0)
return num;
@@ -198,9 +195,7 @@ static int bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
ret = -ENOMEM;
err_failed:
mutex_lock(&battery_mutex);
idr_remove(&battery_id, num);
mutex_unlock(&battery_mutex);
ida_free(&battery_id, num);
return ret;
}
@@ -212,9 +207,7 @@ static void bq27xxx_battery_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
free_irq(client->irq, di);
bq27xxx_battery_teardown(di);
mutex_lock(&battery_mutex);
idr_remove(&battery_id, di->id);
mutex_unlock(&battery_mutex);
ida_free(&battery_id, di->id);
}
static const struct i2c_device_id bq27xxx_i2c_id_table[] = {