mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-07-22 02:17:36 -04:00
blk-cgroup: don't nest queue_lock under blkcg->lock in blkcg_destroy_blkgs()
The correct lock order is q->queue_lock before blkcg->lock, and in order to prevent deadlock from blkcg_destroy_blkgs(), trylock is used for q->queue_lock while blkcg->lock is already held, this is hacky. Refactor blkcg_destroy_blkgs() to hold blkcg->lock only long enough to get the first blkg and then release it. Then take q->queue_lock and blkcg->lock in the correct order to destroy the blkg. This is a very cold path, so the extra lock/unlock cycles are acceptable. Also prepare to convert protecting blkcg with blkcg_mutex instead of queue_lock. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai@fygo.io> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/00b03cf74a9937cb4d6dd67a189ddc00a3de0451.1780621988.git.yukuai@fygo.io Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1239,6 +1239,21 @@ struct list_head *blkcg_get_cgwb_list(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
|
||||
* This finally frees the blkcg.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
static struct blkcg_gq *blkcg_get_first_blkg(struct blkcg *blkcg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct blkcg_gq *blkg = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
|
||||
if (!hlist_empty(&blkcg->blkg_list)) {
|
||||
blkg = hlist_entry(blkcg->blkg_list.first, struct blkcg_gq,
|
||||
blkcg_node);
|
||||
blkg_get(blkg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return blkg;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* blkcg_destroy_blkgs - responsible for shooting down blkgs
|
||||
* @blkcg: blkcg of interest
|
||||
@@ -1252,32 +1267,24 @@ struct list_head *blkcg_get_cgwb_list(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void blkcg_destroy_blkgs(struct blkcg *blkcg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct blkcg_gq *blkg;
|
||||
|
||||
might_sleep();
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
while (!hlist_empty(&blkcg->blkg_list)) {
|
||||
struct blkcg_gq *blkg = hlist_entry(blkcg->blkg_list.first,
|
||||
struct blkcg_gq, blkcg_node);
|
||||
while ((blkg = blkcg_get_first_blkg(blkcg))) {
|
||||
struct request_queue *q = blkg->q;
|
||||
|
||||
if (need_resched() || !spin_trylock(&q->queue_lock)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Given that the system can accumulate a huge number
|
||||
* of blkgs in pathological cases, check to see if we
|
||||
* need to rescheduling to avoid softlockup.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock(&blkcg->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
blkg_destroy(blkg);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&q->queue_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&blkcg->lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
blkg_put(blkg);
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user